Objective To compare the safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy(LPD)and open pancreatoduodenectomy(OPD)and analyze the learning curve and safety at different stages of LPD.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 50 LPD patients and 54 OPD patients in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to June 2024,and intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared.The Cumulative Sum(CUSUM)analysis method was used to analyze the technical nodes of the LPD learning curve.Results There were no significant differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the LPD group and the OPD group(P＞0.05).There was also no significant difference in the incidence rates of pancreatic fistula(grade B and C),delayed gastric emptying,postoperative bleeding,biliary fistula and intra-abdominal infection between the LPD group and the OPD group(P＞0.05).A time series plot of operation time was drawn based on the patient's operation time and surgical sequence,yielding a fitted curve.Curve analysis showed initial stage and stable stage were finished at the 17th and 24th cases.The LPD learning curve could be divided into three stages:stage Ⅰ characterized as the initial stage(cases 1 to 17),stage Ⅱ characterized as the stable stage(cases 18 to 24),and stage Ⅲ characterized as the proficient stage(cases 25 to 50).The operation time in stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ was significantly shorter than that in stage Ⅰ,and the intraoperative blood loss in stage Ⅰ was significantly higher than that in stage Ⅲ(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three stages(P＞0.05).Conclusion LPD and OPD show no significant differences in indications and safety.The LPD learning curve can be divided into three stages.As the number of surgeries completed increa-ses,the operation time of physicians gradually shortens,and the incidence of complications of patients gradually decreases.

Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of selective hepatic inflow occlusion in laparoscopic hepatectomy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 64 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy.Based on the different methods of hepatic in-flow occlusion,the patients were divided into Pringle occlusion group with 31 patients(using inter-mittent Pringle's maneuver)and selective occlusion group with 33 patients(using selective hepatic inflow occlusion).The general,intraoperative,and postoperative data were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in general data,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,central venous pressure,and mean arterial pressure between the two groups(P＞0.05).On postoperative day 3,the levels of alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),and total bilirubin(TBil)in the selective occlusion group were lower than those in the Pringle occlusion group(P＜0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates between the two groups(P＞0.05).Sub-group analysis showed that in patients undergoing laparoscopic hemihepatectomy,the AST and ALT levels on postoperative day 3 were lower in the selective occlusion group than in the Pringle occlusion group(P＜0.05).In patients undergoing laparoscopic liver segmentectomy,the TBil level on postop-erative day 3 was lower in the selective occlusion group than in the Pringle occlusion group(P＜0.05),but there were no statistically significant differences in AST and ALT levels between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Selective hepatic inflow occlusion demonstrates good safety and efficacy in laparoscopic hepatectomy.It can significantly reduce postoperative liver function damage,espe-cially in patients undergoing hemihepatectomy.