1.SPOCK2 promotes the invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells through FAK signaling pathway
Xiaoli ZHENG ; Hua WU ; Weipei ZHU
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(5):e98-
Objective:
Ovarian cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, with the highest mortality rate among gynecological cancers. This study aims to investigate the molecular mechanisms of SPOCK2 in ovarian cancer progression and metastasis and evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target.
Methods:
The expression levels of SPOCK2 in ovarian cancer tissues and normal tissues were analyzed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and immunohistochemistry experiments. Functional assays, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and migration assays, were performed in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cells to explore the role of SPOCK2. The interaction between SPOCK2 and ITGA3 and the subsequent activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling were investigated.In vivo experiments were conducted to validate the effects of SPOCK2 knockdown on tumor metastasis and invasiveness.
Results:
SPOCK2 expression was significantly upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues compared to normal tissues and was associated with poor prognosis. Functional assays demonstrated that SPOCK2 promotes EMT, invasion, and migration in HGSOC cells by interacting with ITGA3 and activating FAK signaling. In vivo experiments confirmed that SPOCK2 knockdown significantly suppressed tumor metastasis and invasiveness.
Conclusion
This study highlights the critical role of the SPOCK2/ITGA3 axis in driving ovarian cancer progression and provides evidence for SPOCK2 as a potential molecular marker and therapeutic target. These findings offer new insights into the early diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer, with significant clinical implications for improving patient outcomes.
2.Comparison of efficacy and safety of generic versus original vildagliptin tablets in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real world study
Zhiyong WEN ; Jiahao GUO ; Xueming YANG ; Xueqin LI ; Yu HE ; Bo JI ; Yinxiang SUN ; Hongyun LU ; Fangfang WEN ; Guifeng WANG ; Weipei WU ; Zhiling ZHOU
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(3):138-144
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin tablets (the generic drug) manufactured by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and vildagliptin tablets (the original drug) manufactured by Novartis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in third round of national centralized volume-based procurement.Methods:The study design was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study subjects were T2DM patients treated with vildagliptin tablets at the Outpatient Department of Zhuhai People′s Hospital, Zhongshan City People′s Hospital, Jiangmen Central Hospital, and General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA from January 2020 to December 2021. Using the hospital electronic medical record system, medical records in outpatients who met the inclusion criteria were collected, and relevant clinical data were extracted. The patients were divided into generic drug group and original drug group. To exclude the interference of confounding factors, the propensity score matching method was used. The efficacy evaluation index was the magnitude of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) reductions within one year after administration. Generalized linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for the magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reduction. The safety evaluation index was the incidence of adverse events within one year of drug use.Results:A total of 4 511 patients with T2DM who were treated with vildagliptin tablets were collected from 4 hospitals, including 3 039 in the generic drug group and 1 472 in the original drug group. After treatment, the HbA1c and FPG in patients of the 2 groups decreased compared with those before treatment. The magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reductions in patients of the generic drug group were not significantly different from those in the original drug group [0.50 (0.05, 2.30)% vs. 0.90 (-0.10, 1.70)%, Z=0.235, P=0.814; 0.59 (-0.40, 2.20) mmol/L vs. 1.00 (-0.61, 2.32) mmol/L, Z=0.421, P=0.674]. The results of generalized linear regression model analysis showed that the therapeutic drugs did not affect the magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reductions ( P=0.627, P=0.478). Compared with the original drug group, the incidences of adverse events and hypoglycemia in the generic drug group were not statistically significant [1.6‰ (5/3 039) vs. 2.7‰ (4/1 472), P=0.721; 0.7 ‰ (2/3 039) vs. 0.7 ‰ (1/1 472), P=1.000]. Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of generic vildagliptin tablets manufactured by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. were generally consistent with those of the original drug in the treatment of T2DM.
3.Comparison of efficacy and safety of generic versus original vildagliptin tablets in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real world study
Zhiyong WEN ; Jiahao GUO ; Xueming YANG ; Xueqin LI ; Yu HE ; Bo JI ; Yinxiang SUN ; Hongyun LU ; Fangfang WEN ; Guifeng WANG ; Weipei WU ; Zhiling ZHOU
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(3):138-144
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin tablets (the generic drug) manufactured by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and vildagliptin tablets (the original drug) manufactured by Novartis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in third round of national centralized volume-based procurement.Methods:The study design was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study subjects were T2DM patients treated with vildagliptin tablets at the Outpatient Department of Zhuhai People′s Hospital, Zhongshan City People′s Hospital, Jiangmen Central Hospital, and General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA from January 2020 to December 2021. Using the hospital electronic medical record system, medical records in outpatients who met the inclusion criteria were collected, and relevant clinical data were extracted. The patients were divided into generic drug group and original drug group. To exclude the interference of confounding factors, the propensity score matching method was used. The efficacy evaluation index was the magnitude of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) reductions within one year after administration. Generalized linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for the magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reduction. The safety evaluation index was the incidence of adverse events within one year of drug use.Results:A total of 4 511 patients with T2DM who were treated with vildagliptin tablets were collected from 4 hospitals, including 3 039 in the generic drug group and 1 472 in the original drug group. After treatment, the HbA1c and FPG in patients of the 2 groups decreased compared with those before treatment. The magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reductions in patients of the generic drug group were not significantly different from those in the original drug group [0.50 (0.05, 2.30)% vs. 0.90 (-0.10, 1.70)%, Z=0.235, P=0.814; 0.59 (-0.40, 2.20) mmol/L vs. 1.00 (-0.61, 2.32) mmol/L, Z=0.421, P=0.674]. The results of generalized linear regression model analysis showed that the therapeutic drugs did not affect the magnitude of HbA1c and FPG reductions ( P=0.627, P=0.478). Compared with the original drug group, the incidences of adverse events and hypoglycemia in the generic drug group were not statistically significant [1.6‰ (5/3 039) vs. 2.7‰ (4/1 472), P=0.721; 0.7 ‰ (2/3 039) vs. 0.7 ‰ (1/1 472), P=1.000]. Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of generic vildagliptin tablets manufactured by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. were generally consistent with those of the original drug in the treatment of T2DM.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail