Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication associated with significant morbidity and healthcare burden. Despite advances in diabetes care, recurrent DKA remains common, often reflecting gaps in treatment adherence and patient education. Identifying predictors of recurrence is crucial for risk stratification and targeted intervention. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all adult DKA admissions to a tertiary centre between 2001 and 2025. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic data, biochemical parameters, precipitating factors, and clinical outcomes. DKA was defined using standard biochemical criteria. Recurrent DKA was defined as ≥2 admissions during the study period. Factors associated with recurrent DKA admissions were analyzed. Patients under the age of 18 years and those with missing vital information were excluded. Results: A total of 667 DKA admissions, comprising 566 patients, were identified, of which 101 admissions (15.1%) were recurrent, involving 65 patients. Among recurrent DKA episodes, the most common precipitating factors were infection (64.4%) and insulin omission (62.4%). After multivariate analyses, patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were more likely to develop recurrent DKA compared to those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (aOR 4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58–6.70; p <0.001). Insulin omission was strongly associated with recurrent DKA (aOR 2.29; 95% CI 1.46–3.60; p <0.001). In contrast, baseline glycated hemoglobin and chronic kidney disease were not significantly associated with recurrence. Diabetic counseling during the first DKA admission did not reduce recurrent DKA. There were no significant differences in mortality (3.9% vs 6.2%, p = 0.524) or critical care admission rates (40.6% vs 38.7%, p = 0.718) between recurrent and first DKA episodes. Conclusion Recurrent DKA accounts for a substantial proportion of DKA admissions and is strongly associated with insulin omission and T1DM. Our findings suggest that recurrent DKA is driven predominantly by behavioral and adherencerelated factors, indicating the need for multidisciplinary interventions beyond standard inpatient counseling.
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ; Retrospective Studies

Introduction: The rising incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents a paradigm shift from its traditional recognition as a hallmark complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, contemporary data comparing clinical presentation, precipitating factors, and outcomes between these two populations remain limited. Methodology: In this retrospective observational study, all adult DKA admissions with T1DM or T2DM at a tertiary centre between 2001 and 2025 were studied. DKA was defined according to standard biochemical criteria. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic data, biochemical parameters, precipitating factors, management details, and clinical outcomes of all adult DKA admission in T1DM and T2DM. Patients aged <18 years or those with incomplete data were excluded. Results: A total of 601 DKA episodes were analyzed, comprising 130 (21.6%) in patients with T1DM and 471 (78.4%) in those with T2DM. Mean age was 26.9 ± 0.71 years for T1DM and 52.1 ± 0.7 years for T2DM. Gender distribution was balanced (male 48.3%, female 51.7%). Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 11.3 ± 0.3% in T1DM and 12.1 ± 0.2% in T2DM. Infection was the most common precipitating factor overall (69.0%), occurring more frequently in T2DM than in T1DM (74.7% vs. 56.2%), followed by medication non-adherence (62.4% vs. 43.8%). Significant differences were observed between groups in admission pH, bicarbonate (both p <0.001), blood ketones (p = 0.028), and HbA1c (p = 0.010), whereas anion gap (p = 0.056) and blood glucose levels (p = 0.755) did not differ significantly. Clinical outcomes were comparable with respect to intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (40.0% in T1DM vs. 39.0% in T2DM, p = 0.779) and median resolution time (p = 0.462). However, the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in T2DM (8.2 ± 0.32 vs. 5.4 ± 0.4 days; p <0.001). Overall mortality was 6.0%, with substantially higher mortality in T2DM compared to T1DM (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.013). Conclusion In this large regional series of adult DKA, most episodes occurred in T2DM. Despite similar ICU admission rates and time to resolution, T2DM was associated with more frequent infection-related precipitants, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality, underscoring the need for targeted preventive strategies in this population.
Adult ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Diabetic Ketoacidosis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting

Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in pregnancy is an uncommon yet life-threatening emergency, with disproportionate risks to both mother and fetus. Pregnancy-specific physiological changes predispose patients to rapid metabolic decompensation, often with atypical presentations. Despite this, local data remain limited. We describe the clinical profile, precipitating factors, and outcomes of DKA in pregnancy in a tertiary centre, with emphasis on potentially preventable triggers. Cases: Nine pregnant patients with DKA were identified from a retrospective review of all cases admitted for DKA from 2002 to 2025. Mean age was 31.67 ± 5.20 years; all were Malay. The majority had type 2 diabetes mellitus (55.6%), followed by type 1 diabetes (33.3%) and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (11.1%). The mean period of amenorrhea was 19.67 ± 12.62 weeks. Infection was the leading precipitant (44.4%), with additional triggers including insulin omission (22.2%), hyperemesis gravidarum, preterm labor, steroid exposure, and perioperative fasting. Most diagnoses were made in the emergency department (55.6%). Biochemical parameters reflected significant severity (mean bicarbonate 7.89 ± 2.98 mmol/L; anion gap 25.00 ± 5.81), with 88.9% classified as severe DKA. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care was required in 77.8% of cases. The majority (77.8%) were admitted to the ICU unit, with a median time to resolution of 13.00 ± 12.00 hours (interquartile range [IQR]), and the median hospital length of stay was 7.00 ± 5.00 days (IQR). Complications during treatment included hypokalemia (33.3%), acute kidney injury (22.2%), and hypoglycemia (11.1%). Rebound DKA occurred in one-third of patients. All patients were discharged clinically stable. Outcome data demonstrated pregnancy loss in three cases and one preterm birth. Conclusion DKA in pregnancy remains a severe and resource-intensive condition. This series highlights missed opportunities in prevention, with modifiable precipitants such as infection and insulin omission commonly identified. The high severity at presentation suggests delays in recognition. Early detection, optimized metabolic care, and targeted preventive strategies are crucial to improving maternal and fetal outcomes.
Female ; Pregnancy ; Diabetic Ketoacidosis

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common among individuals with underlying chronic illnesses. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the global prevalence and patterns of CAM use among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus were searched from inception until 26th February 2024. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Original articles reporting the use of at least one type of CAM among individuals aged above 18 years old and at all stages of CKD or undergoing any form of kidney replacement therapy. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening. The data were extracted from the included studies by one reviewer and cross-checked by another. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus among two reviewers. Primary information included prevalence of CAM use, types of CAM used, reasons for CAM use, factors associated with CAM use, and disclosure to healthcare providers. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the pooled prevalence of CAM use and non-disclosure of CAM using a random effect model. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of CAM use was 43% (95% confidence interval: 34%, 51%), I² = 99.46%. The reasons for CAM use included treatment of underlying comorbidities, complications or symptoms, maintenance of general health, and treatment of CKD. Nutritional approaches were the most common CAM modality, with 412 different herbal and dietary supplements reported; psychological and physical approaches included massage therapy, relaxation techniques, and mind-body practices; and other complementary health approaches such as homeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine, and Ayurvedic medicine were also frequently reported. Factors associated with CAM use included sociodemographic characteristics such as older age, female gender, or higher income; disease or therapy factors such as not having diabetes, relying on hemodialysis, or poor adherence to medication; and patient or internal factors such as positive attitude towards CAM and perceived safety of CAM. About 66% (61%, 72%) of CAM users did not disclose the use of CAM to their healthcare providers. CONCLUSION CAM use is prevalent among individuals with CKD, and healthcare providers should communicate openly and effectively to emphasize the rational use of CAM to avoid potential harm. Please cite this article as: Chin JW, Abdullah R, Tan BWW, Wong KW, Khor BH. Prevalence and patterns of complementary and alternative medicine usage among adults with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(4): 370-381.
Adult ; Humans ; Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data* ; Prevalence ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy*

Aged ; Feasibility Studies ; Health Status ; Humans ; Mobile Applications ; Treatment Outcome

Asian People ; Humans ; Prevalence ; Stereotyping

Objective: To assess the public health risk to Singapore posed by the emergence of artemisinin-resistant (ART-R) malaria in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). Methods: We assessed the likelihood of importation of drug-resistant malaria into Singapore and the impact on public health of its subsequent secondary spread in Singapore. Literature on the epidemiology and contextual factors associated with ART-R malaria was reviewed. The epidemiology of malaria cases in Singapore was analysed. The vulnerability and receptivity of Singapore were examined, including the connectivity with countries reporting ART-R malaria, as well as the preparedness of Singaporean health authorities. Sources of information include international journals, World Health Organization guidelines, data from the Singapore Ministry of Health and National Public Health Laboratory of the National Centre for Infectious Diseases, and the International Air Transport Association. Results: The importation of ART-R malaria into Singapore is possible given the close proximity and significant travel volume between Singapore and the GMS countries reporting artemisinin resistance. Singapore’s vulnerability is further enhanced by the presence of foreign workers from neighbouring endemic countries. Nonetheless, the overall likelihood of such an event is low based on the rarity and decreasing trend of imported malaria incidence. With the presence of Anopheles vectors in Singapore, imported cases of drug-resistant malaria could cause secondary transmission. Nevertheless, the risk of sustained spread is likely to be mitigated by the comprehensive surveillance and control system in place for both infected vectors and human cases. Discussion This risk assessment highlights the need for a continued high degree of vigilance of ART-R malaria locally and globally to minimize the risk and public health impact of drug-resistant malaria in Singapore.