OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation robots in treating lower limb motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,and to compare the differences in therapeutic effects among different robots.METHODS:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation robotics for the treatment of motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,published from database inception to April 10,2024.The main outcome indicators included muscle strength,muscle tension,balance function,step speed,step frequency,step length,walking endurance,lower limb motor function,and activities of daily living.The above indicators were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health.Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and compare the therapeutic efficacy of different rehabilitation robots.Literature search and screening were performed by two researchers,and the quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS:(1)Fifteen articles were finally included,involving 512 patients with 260 in the experimental group and 252 in the control group.(2)The Meta-analysis results showed that rehabilitation robots could improve body structure and function[standardized mean difference=0.41,95%confidence interval(CI):0.24-0.58,P<0.05],activities(standardized mean difference=0.53,95%CI:0.41-0.65,P<0.05)and participation ability(mean difference=7.86,95%CI:1.54-14.18,P<0.05).In particular,the rehabilitation robot improved lower limb muscle strength,balance function,step speed,walking endurance,lower limb gross motor function,and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy,but showed insignificant effects on step frequency,step length,and muscle tension.(3)The network Meta-analysis results showed that:step speed:Innowalkpro>Gait Trainer>Lokomat>3DCalt;6-minute walk test score:Gait Trainer>Lokomat>Lokohelp>Innowalkro;Gross Motor Function Measure-88D score:Lokohelp>Lokomat>KidGo>Innowalkpro>3DCalt;Gross Motor Function Measure-88E score:Lokomat>Lokohelp>KidGo>3DCalt>Innowalkpro.CONCLUSION:Based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disability,and Health,rehabilitation robot training can improve the lower limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy.The Innowalkpro robot was more effective in improving step speed;the Gait trainer robot was more effective in improving 6-minute walk test scores;the Lokohelp robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88D zone scores;and the Lokomat robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88E zone scores.

OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation robots in treating lower limb motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,and to compare the differences in therapeutic effects among different robots.METHODS:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation robotics for the treatment of motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,published from database inception to April 10,2024.The main outcome indicators included muscle strength,muscle tension,balance function,step speed,step frequency,step length,walking endurance,lower limb motor function,and activities of daily living.The above indicators were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health.Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and compare the therapeutic efficacy of different rehabilitation robots.Literature search and screening were performed by two researchers,and the quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS:(1)Fifteen articles were finally included,involving 512 patients with 260 in the experimental group and 252 in the control group.(2)The Meta-analysis results showed that rehabilitation robots could improve body structure and function[standardized mean difference=0.41,95%confidence interval(CI):0.24-0.58,P<0.05],activities(standardized mean difference=0.53,95%CI:0.41-0.65,P<0.05)and participation ability(mean difference=7.86,95%CI:1.54-14.18,P<0.05).In particular,the rehabilitation robot improved lower limb muscle strength,balance function,step speed,walking endurance,lower limb gross motor function,and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy,but showed insignificant effects on step frequency,step length,and muscle tension.(3)The network Meta-analysis results showed that:step speed:Innowalkpro>Gait Trainer>Lokomat>3DCalt;6-minute walk test score:Gait Trainer>Lokomat>Lokohelp>Innowalkro;Gross Motor Function Measure-88D score:Lokohelp>Lokomat>KidGo>Innowalkpro>3DCalt;Gross Motor Function Measure-88E score:Lokomat>Lokohelp>KidGo>3DCalt>Innowalkpro.CONCLUSION:Based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disability,and Health,rehabilitation robot training can improve the lower limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy.The Innowalkpro robot was more effective in improving step speed;the Gait trainer robot was more effective in improving 6-minute walk test scores;the Lokohelp robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88D zone scores;and the Lokomat robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88E zone scores.

OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation exoskeleton robots on the lower limb motor function of stroke patients using Meta-analysis and to compare the efficacy of different lower limb exoskeleton robots,so as to provide a theoretical basis for the scientific selection of suitable exoskeleton robots for patients with post-stroke lower limb motor dysfunction. METHODS:Computer searches of the Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,CNKI,VIP,and WanFang Data were conducted to collect randomized controlled clinical studies on exploring lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton robots to improve lower limb motor function in stroke patients published from database inception to November 2022.Two researchers conducted the literature search and screening.The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool and the Jadad scale.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software. RESULTS:(1)Finally 22 publications were included,involving 865 patients(n=436 in the test group and n=429 in the control group),and the Jadad score showed that all the included articles were of high quality.(2)Meta-analysis results showed that the exoskeleton robot significantly improved the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity score(mean difference[MD]=2.63,95%confidence interval[CI]:1.87-3.38,P<0.05),Berg Balance Scale score(MD=3.62,95%CI:1.21-6.03,P<0.05),Timed Up and Go score(MD=-2.77,95%CI:-4.48 to-1.05,P<0.05)and step frequency score(MD=3.15,95%CI:1.57-4.72,P<0.05)in stroke patients compared with the control group.However,there was no significant improvement in the Functional Ambulation Category Scale score(MD=0.30,95%CI:-0.01 to 0.61,P>0.05)and 6-minute walk test score(MD=3.77,95%CI:-6.60 to 14.14,P>0.05).(3)Network Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the conventional rehabilitation therapy,both the level-walking exoskeleton(MD=10.23,95%CI:3.81-27.49,P<0.05)and the body-weight support exoskeleton(MD=33.66,95%CI:11.49-98.54,P<0.05)improved the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity score.Compared with the conventional rehabilitation therapy,body-weight support exoskeleton significantly improved the Berg Balance Scale scores(MD=79.86,95%CI:2.34-2 725.99,P<0.05).In terms of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity and Berg Balance Scale scores,the ranking results were body-weight support exoskeleton>level-walking exoskeleton>conventional rehabilitation therapy.Compared with the conventional rehabilitation therapy,level-walking exoskeleton significantly improved the Functional Ambulation Category Scale score(MD=1.38,95%CI:1.00-1.90,P<0.05)and body-weight support exoskeleton significantly improved the Timed Up and Go score(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.01-0.51,P<0.05).In terms of Functional Ambulation Category Scale and Timed Up and Go scores,the ranking results were level-walking exoskeleton>body-weight support exoskeleton>conventional rehabilitation therapy. CONCLUSION:Rehabilitation exoskeleton robots can improve balance,walking and activities of daily living in stroke patients,with body-weight support exoskeleton being more effective in improving lower limb motor function and balance and level walking exoskeleton being more effective in improving functional walking and transfer.

OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on the motor function of patients with Parkinson's disease,and to compare the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation at different targets on the motor function of patients with Parkinson's disease,so as to provide a theoretical basis for the target selection of transcranial direct current stimulation in clinical practice. METHODS:Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,CNKI,VIP,WanFang Data were retrieved for randomized controlled trials on the improvement of motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease by transcranial direct current stimulation published from the database inception to January 2023.The keywords were"Parkinson,transcranial direct current stimulation"in English and Chinese.The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool and the PEDro scale.Meta-analysis of outcome indicators was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software. RESULTS:Fifteen randomized controlled trials were finally included,and the PEDro scale showed that all were high-quality or very high-quality studies.Meta-analysis showed that transcranial direct current stimulation significantly improved Unified-Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III score[mean difference(MD)=-2.49,95%confidence interval(CI):-4.42 to-0.55,P<0.05),step frequency score(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.03-0.11,P<0.05)and step speed score(MD=0.02,95%CI:0.00-0.05,P<0.05),but not for Berg Balance Scale scores(MD=2.57,95%CI:-0.74 to 5.87,P>0.05).Network Meta-analysis probability ranking:In terms of Unified-Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III scores,the probability ranking results of target stimulation efficacy were dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex(52.4%)>primary motor cortex(45.8%)>central point of the brain(1.8%)>conventional rehabilitation(0%);in terms of gait frequency scores,the probability probability ranking results of target stimulation efficacy were cerebellum(50.1%)>central point of the brain(45.8%)>dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex(3.9%)>primary motor cortex(0.2%)>conventional rehabilitation(0%);in terms of gait speed scores,the probability ranking results of target stimulation efficacy were cerebellum(64.8%)>dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex(23.8%)>central point of the brain(9.4%)>primary motor cortex(1.7%)>conventional rehabilitation(0.4%);in terms of Berg Balance Scale scores,the probability ranking results of target stimulation efficacy were cerebellum(77.4%)>dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex(20.7%)>central point of the brain(0.7%)>conventional rehabilitation(0.2%). CONCLUSION:Transcranial direct current stimulation significantly improves motor function of patients with Parkinson's disease,with better motor coordination in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and better walking and balance in the cerebellum.