Objective:To explore the effects of age and gender on the sagittal spinal-pelvic parameters during the natural aging process of healthy adults.Methods:A total of 647 Chinese healthy adults who underwent health check-ups at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Songyang County People's Hospital, from January 2017 to September 2024 were collected. There were 277 males and 370 females, aged 18-93 years. Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the whole spine were taken to evaluate the spinal-pelvic sagittal morphology. The following parameters were measured: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis(LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), global tilt (GT), T 1-pelvic angle (TPA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic Cobb angle (T-Cobb), lower end vertebra of thoracic Cobb angle (T-LEV), apex vertebra of thoracic Cobb angle (T-Apex), lumbar Cobb angle (L-Cobb). Compare the differences in spine-pelvis parameters among patients of different genders and age groups (in this study, the subjects were subdivided into the 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-93 years groups according to the age range). Results:The results showed that GT, SVA, TPA, and PT increased with age ( P<0.05). For males aged 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-93 years, PT values were 8.58°±6.47°, 9.60°±5.63°, 12.65°±7.13°, 11.00°±6.99°, 13.01°±8.63°, 15.77°±8.02°, and 18.47°±10.03° respectively; for females in the same age groups, the PT values were 8.44°±6.83°, 9.00°±6.44°, 11.84°±7.35°, 12.07°±7.51°, 15.44°±9.39°, 19.26°±8.28°, and 18.17°±9.43° respectively. For males in these age groups, the global tilt (GT) values were 6.37°±7.20°, 8.77°±6.51°, 10.38°±9.07°, 8.80°±7.49°, 10.80°±8.62°, 16.07°±10.42°, and 21.99°±12.65° respectively; for females, the GT values were 4.46°±8.09°, 5.96°±7.83°, 8.17°±6.88°, 9.41°±8.03°, 9.96°±1.39°, 17.89°±9.39°, and 19.55°±12.34° respectively. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA) values for males in the age groups were -7.94±25.57 mm, -2.98±25.69 mm, -4.63±20.90 mm, -6.43±32.81 mm, 7.85±43.39 mm, 36.49±53.89 mm, and 55.57±51.10 mm respectively; for females, they were -24.12±31.35 mm, -17.49±25.12 mm, -17.88±22.72 mm, -8.25±30.91 mm, 8.80±27.45 mm, 28.67±38.22 mm, and 23.23±35.19 mm respectively. For males, the thoracic pelvic angle (TPA) values across the age groups were 4.46°±5.94°, 6.05°±5.38°, 9.58°±9.35°, 7.52°±7.64°, 11.23°±9.59°, 16.32°±12.38°, and 18.49°±11.70° respectively; for females, the TPA values were 2.72°±6.88°, 3.68°±6.26°, 7.30°±6.11°, 7.44°±6.75°, 12.64°±9.79°, 19.08°±10.39°, and 16.79°±13.19° respectively. T-Cobb, T-LEV, and T-Apex increased slowly with age ( P<0.05). The pelvic incidence (PI) remained relatively constant in males ( P>0.05), while it increased slowly with age in females ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Sagittal anteversion of the spinal-pelvis increases with age. Gender differences are reflected in specific changes in the fluctuation amplitude of certain parameters (such as PI), and the fluctuations of indicators like T-Cobb, T-LEV, and T-Apex are closely related to the natural aging process of the spine.

Therapeutic resistance in cancer is responsible for numerous cancer deaths in clinical practice. While target mutations are well recognized as the basis of genetic resistance to targeted therapy, nontarget mutation resistance (or nongenetic resistance) remains poorly characterized. Despite its complex and unintegrated mechanisms in the literature, nongenetic resistance is considered from our perspective to be a collective response of innate or acquired resistant subpopulations in heterogeneous tumors to therapy. These subpopulations, e.g., cancer stem-like cells, cancer cells with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and drug-tolerant persisters, are protected by their resistance traits at cellular and molecular levels. This review summarizes recent advances in the research on resistant populations and their resistance traits. NOTCH signaling, as a central regulator of nongenetic resistance, is discussed with a special focus on its canonical maintenance of resistant cancer cells and noncanonical regulation of their resistance traits. This novel view of canonical and noncanonical NOTCH signaling pathways is translated into our proposal of reshaping therapeutic strategies targeting NOTCH signaling in resistant cancer cells. We hope that this review will lead researchers to study the canonical and noncanonical arms of NOTCH signaling as an integrated resistant mechanism, thus promoting the development of innovative therapeutic strategies.
Neoplasms/metabolism* ; Receptors, Notch/metabolism* ; Disease Resistance/physiology* ; Signal Transduction/physiology* ; Humans ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/physiology* ; Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods*

Objective:To explore the effects of age and gender on the sagittal spinal-pelvic parameters during the natural aging process of healthy adults.Methods:A total of 647 Chinese healthy adults who underwent health check-ups at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Songyang County People's Hospital, from January 2017 to September 2024 were collected. There were 277 males and 370 females, aged 18-93 years. Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the whole spine were taken to evaluate the spinal-pelvic sagittal morphology. The following parameters were measured: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis(LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), global tilt (GT), T 1-pelvic angle (TPA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic Cobb angle (T-Cobb), lower end vertebra of thoracic Cobb angle (T-LEV), apex vertebra of thoracic Cobb angle (T-Apex), lumbar Cobb angle (L-Cobb). Compare the differences in spine-pelvis parameters among patients of different genders and age groups (in this study, the subjects were subdivided into the 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-93 years groups according to the age range). Results:The results showed that GT, SVA, TPA, and PT increased with age ( P<0.05). For males aged 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-93 years, PT values were 8.58°±6.47°, 9.60°±5.63°, 12.65°±7.13°, 11.00°±6.99°, 13.01°±8.63°, 15.77°±8.02°, and 18.47°±10.03° respectively; for females in the same age groups, the PT values were 8.44°±6.83°, 9.00°±6.44°, 11.84°±7.35°, 12.07°±7.51°, 15.44°±9.39°, 19.26°±8.28°, and 18.17°±9.43° respectively. For males in these age groups, the global tilt (GT) values were 6.37°±7.20°, 8.77°±6.51°, 10.38°±9.07°, 8.80°±7.49°, 10.80°±8.62°, 16.07°±10.42°, and 21.99°±12.65° respectively; for females, the GT values were 4.46°±8.09°, 5.96°±7.83°, 8.17°±6.88°, 9.41°±8.03°, 9.96°±1.39°, 17.89°±9.39°, and 19.55°±12.34° respectively. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA) values for males in the age groups were -7.94±25.57 mm, -2.98±25.69 mm, -4.63±20.90 mm, -6.43±32.81 mm, 7.85±43.39 mm, 36.49±53.89 mm, and 55.57±51.10 mm respectively; for females, they were -24.12±31.35 mm, -17.49±25.12 mm, -17.88±22.72 mm, -8.25±30.91 mm, 8.80±27.45 mm, 28.67±38.22 mm, and 23.23±35.19 mm respectively. For males, the thoracic pelvic angle (TPA) values across the age groups were 4.46°±5.94°, 6.05°±5.38°, 9.58°±9.35°, 7.52°±7.64°, 11.23°±9.59°, 16.32°±12.38°, and 18.49°±11.70° respectively; for females, the TPA values were 2.72°±6.88°, 3.68°±6.26°, 7.30°±6.11°, 7.44°±6.75°, 12.64°±9.79°, 19.08°±10.39°, and 16.79°±13.19° respectively. T-Cobb, T-LEV, and T-Apex increased slowly with age ( P<0.05). The pelvic incidence (PI) remained relatively constant in males ( P>0.05), while it increased slowly with age in females ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Sagittal anteversion of the spinal-pelvis increases with age. Gender differences are reflected in specific changes in the fluctuation amplitude of certain parameters (such as PI), and the fluctuations of indicators like T-Cobb, T-LEV, and T-Apex are closely related to the natural aging process of the spine.

Objective:To investigate the pathological characteristics in chronic HBV infection patients with different upper limits of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normal values and the influencing factors of liver tissue injury.Methods:The clinical data of 667 chronic HBV infection patients with ALT<40 U/L and HBV DNA loads >30 IU/mL who received liver biopsy in Zhenhai District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Hwa Mei Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The enrolled patients were divided into ALTⅠ group (<30 U/L for males, <19 U/L for females), ALTⅡ group (≥30 U/L and <35 U/L for males, ≥19 U/L and <25 U/L for females) and ALT Ⅲ group (≥35 U/L and <40 U/L for males, ≥25 U/L and <40 U/L for females). According to the degree of liver inflammation (G) and fibrosis stage (S), the enrolled patients were divided into non-significant damage group (G<2 and S<2) and significant damage group (≥G2 or/and ≥S2). Ridit analysis was used to compare the G/S composition ratio among three ALT groups, Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of liver injury, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze the optimal diagnostic threshold of ALT.Results:There were significant differences in the composition ratio of G and S among the three ALT groups( χ2=13.926 and 14.702, both P<0.001). The constituent ratios of significant liver pathological damage in the three groups of ALT levels were 26.05% (99/380), 32.03% (41/128) and 46.54% (74/159), respectively( χ2=21.596, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high white/globulin ratio and PLT counts( OR=0.246 and 0.986, both P<0.001)were the protective factors for liver tissue injury; while negative HBcAg staining and elevated ALT and GGT levels ( OR=3.797, 1.053 and 1.013, P<0.001 or <0.05) were the risk factors of liver injury. ROC curve demonstrated the ALT threshold of liver tissue damage in male and female patients were 25.6 U/L and 25.5 U/L. Conclusions:In chronic HBV infection patients with normal ALT, with the increase of ALT level, the degree of liver tissue pathological damage may become more severe. The study demonstrates that it is necessary to lower the ALT threshold for protecting patients from liver tissue pathological damage.