Background and Aims:Totally implantable venous access port(TIVAP)are widely used for chemotherapy,blood transfusion,and nutritional support in patients with malignancies.Among them,upper arm port(UAP)are increasingly recommended in clinical practice due to their advantages in avoiding thoracic complications and providing more concealed incisions.Currently,two main implantation techniques are used for UAP:the tunnel needle-transverse incision technique and the puncture point-transverse incision technique.This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of these two techniques in patients with hematological malignancies,focusing on safety and cosmetic appearance,to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 412 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent UAP implantation at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between December 2021 and December 2024.Based on the implantation method,patients were divided into the tunnel needle-transverse incision group(n=200)and the puncture point-transverse incision group(n=212).Intraoperative variables(operative time,intraoperative pain score,catheter kinking at the pocket,intraoperative blood loss)and postoperative indicators(incidence of complications and incision aesthetic satisfaction)were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups(all P>0.05),indicating comparability.The puncture point-transverse incision group showed superior performance in operative time[(32.99±4.91)min vs.(41.42±5.35)min],catheter kinking rate(1.4％vs.8.5％),and incision aesthetic satisfaction(7.99±0.58 vs.6.26±0.86)compared with the tunnel needle-transverse incision group(all P<0.05).Although the puncture point group had slightly more intraoperative bleeding[(4.52±1.02)mL vs.(4.16±0.83)mL],the difference,while statistically significant,was of limited clinical relevance.No significant differences were observed between the two groups in intraoperative pain scores or incidence of postoperative complications(both P>0.05).Conclusion:The puncture point-transverse incision technique offers significant advantages in terms of operative efficiency,reduced catheter kinking,and improved incision aesthetics,without compromising safety.It represents a promising alternative to the traditional tunnel needle-transverse incision method and has strong potential for broader clinical adoption.The puncture point-transverse incision technique offers advantages such as shorter operative time,lower catheter kinking rate,and higher incision aesthetic satisfaction.It is a promising alternative to the traditional tunnel needle-transverse incision technique and has good potential for clinical application and promotion.

Background and Aims:Totally implantable venous access ports(TIVAP)are widely used in patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy.Traditional butterfly needle puncture fixation methods have limitations,including low success rates,increased pain,and risk of needle-stick injury.This study aimed to design an adjustable puncture protection kit for butterfly needles and evaluate its clinical utility using a simulated device.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients implanted with upper arm ports in the Hematology Department of Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,from January to December 2024.The patients were divided into a study group and a control group,with 35 cases in each,using a randomized block design.The study group underwent puncture with the simulated adjustable protection kit,while the control group used the traditional finger fixation method.Outcomes compared included first-attempt success rate,vertical puncture rate,pain score,puncture time,and complication rate.Results:The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced.The study group had significantly higher first-attempt puncture success rate and vertical puncture rate than the control group(94.3%vs.77.1%;91.4%vs.57.1%,both P<0.05).In the experimental group compared with the control group,pain scores were lower(1.80±1.13 vs.2.94±1.33,P<0.05),and puncture time was shorter[(31.31±9.05)s vs.(41.80±23.97)s,P<0.05].There was no significant difference in the incidence of puncture-related complications between the two groups(2.9%vs.14.3%,P>0.05).Conclusion:The simulated adjustable butterfly needle puncture protection kit effectively improves puncture success,enhances efficiency,reduces patient pain,and demonstrates good clinical safety.This innovative design provides a promising solution for reducing needle-stick injury risks and optimizing port puncture procedures,although larger,multicenter,and long-term studies are warranted.

Background and Aims:Totally implantable venous access port(TIVAP)are widely used for chemotherapy,blood transfusion,and nutritional support in patients with malignancies.Among them,upper arm port(UAP)are increasingly recommended in clinical practice due to their advantages in avoiding thoracic complications and providing more concealed incisions.Currently,two main implantation techniques are used for UAP:the tunnel needle-transverse incision technique and the puncture point-transverse incision technique.This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of these two techniques in patients with hematological malignancies,focusing on safety and cosmetic appearance,to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 412 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent UAP implantation at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between December 2021 and December 2024.Based on the implantation method,patients were divided into the tunnel needle-transverse incision group(n=200)and the puncture point-transverse incision group(n=212).Intraoperative variables(operative time,intraoperative pain score,catheter kinking at the pocket,intraoperative blood loss)and postoperative indicators(incidence of complications and incision aesthetic satisfaction)were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups(all P>0.05),indicating comparability.The puncture point-transverse incision group showed superior performance in operative time[(32.99±4.91)min vs.(41.42±5.35)min],catheter kinking rate(1.4％vs.8.5％),and incision aesthetic satisfaction(7.99±0.58 vs.6.26±0.86)compared with the tunnel needle-transverse incision group(all P<0.05).Although the puncture point group had slightly more intraoperative bleeding[(4.52±1.02)mL vs.(4.16±0.83)mL],the difference,while statistically significant,was of limited clinical relevance.No significant differences were observed between the two groups in intraoperative pain scores or incidence of postoperative complications(both P>0.05).Conclusion:The puncture point-transverse incision technique offers significant advantages in terms of operative efficiency,reduced catheter kinking,and improved incision aesthetics,without compromising safety.It represents a promising alternative to the traditional tunnel needle-transverse incision method and has strong potential for broader clinical adoption.The puncture point-transverse incision technique offers advantages such as shorter operative time,lower catheter kinking rate,and higher incision aesthetic satisfaction.It is a promising alternative to the traditional tunnel needle-transverse incision technique and has good potential for clinical application and promotion.

Background and Aims:Totally implantable venous access ports(TIVAP)are widely used in patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy.Traditional butterfly needle puncture fixation methods have limitations,including low success rates,increased pain,and risk of needle-stick injury.This study aimed to design an adjustable puncture protection kit for butterfly needles and evaluate its clinical utility using a simulated device.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients implanted with upper arm ports in the Hematology Department of Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,from January to December 2024.The patients were divided into a study group and a control group,with 35 cases in each,using a randomized block design.The study group underwent puncture with the simulated adjustable protection kit,while the control group used the traditional finger fixation method.Outcomes compared included first-attempt success rate,vertical puncture rate,pain score,puncture time,and complication rate.Results:The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced.The study group had significantly higher first-attempt puncture success rate and vertical puncture rate than the control group(94.3%vs.77.1%;91.4%vs.57.1%,both P<0.05).In the experimental group compared with the control group,pain scores were lower(1.80±1.13 vs.2.94±1.33,P<0.05),and puncture time was shorter[(31.31±9.05)s vs.(41.80±23.97)s,P<0.05].There was no significant difference in the incidence of puncture-related complications between the two groups(2.9%vs.14.3%,P>0.05).Conclusion:The simulated adjustable butterfly needle puncture protection kit effectively improves puncture success,enhances efficiency,reduces patient pain,and demonstrates good clinical safety.This innovative design provides a promising solution for reducing needle-stick injury risks and optimizing port puncture procedures,although larger,multicenter,and long-term studies are warranted.