The indications for endoscopic resection (ER) and the criteria for the curability of early gastric cancer (EGC) have been expanding. Among Korea, Japan, and Europe, Korea has the most strictly defined indication for ER, followed by Europe and Japan, whereas the curability criteria are relatively similar. Additional surgery is the standard treatment after noncurative resection; however, it is not frequently performed in older patients in clinical practice. Several risk-scoring systems have been developed to further stratify the risk of lymph node metastasis after noncurative resection, and they may help refine the indications for ER and curability assessment in older patients. Nevertheless, the current evidence remains insufficient to establish recommendations specific to this population. In older patients, most deaths are attributable to non-gastric cancer-related causes, regardless of the post-resection treatment strategy. Therefore, in addition to gastric cancer-specific mortality, non-gastric cancer-related mortality and quality of life should be considered.Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques continue to evolve. Traction methods and multibending endoscopes are useful for achieving safe and reliable ESD in selected cases.Although no intervention has been proven effective in reducing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD in randomized controlled trials, several closure methods have shown promising results in retrospective or phase II studies. Furthermore, novel image-enhanced endoscopies may help improve the technical success of gastric ESD. This review provides an evidence-based perspective that may guide optimal management of patients with EGC.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment method for early gastric cancers (EGCs) due to the negligible risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Eastern Asian countries. According to the guidelines, the curability of EGC after endoscopic resection was classified into three groups: curative resection, expanded curative resection, and noncurative resection. In Eastern Asian countries, a structured follow-up schedule is needed for patients undergoing curative resection and expanded curative resection. Conversely, in Western countries, additional surgery may be recommended for some patients undergoing expanded curative resection (ulcerated, undifferentiated, or slight submucosal invasion) due to the potential risk for LNM, even though specimens of ESD and surgery may not be handled with the same methodology as that used in Japan, which may lead to this slightly higher risk. In noncurative resection, additional surgery is the standard method after ESD because of the risk for LNM. However, in elderly patients and/or those with severe underlying diseases, the advantages and disadvantages of additional surgery should be considered when selecting a post-ESD treatment strategy for patients undergoing noncurative resection. Risk-scoring systems for LNM may facilitate clinical decisions for these patients. However, it should be noted that when recurrence was detected in patients who were followed up with no additional treatment after ESD with noncurative resection, most of them had a poor prognosis. To select an appropriate treatment method, especially in elderly patients undergoing ESD with noncurative resection, a new tool for evaluating the condition of patients should be established.