1.Prevalence of rs5186 (AGTR1 A1166C) and its association with risk factors in primary hypertension
Nguyen Thi Tai Cao ; Phat Tan Tran ; Thiet Minh Trinh ; Khuong Thi Thanh Tran
Medical Journal of Indonesia 2026;35(3):170-177
BACKGROUND :
The prevalence of rs5186 (AGTR1 A1166C) in the Mekong Delta remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of rs5186 in patients with primary hypertension at Xuyen A Vinh Long hospital and to investigate its association with some risk factors for hypertension.
METHODS :
A case-control study was conducted including 65 hypertensive and 65 non-hypertensive patients. Genotype analysis of rs5186 was performed using tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction, and glucose level and lipid profiles were measured. Associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms, biochemical indicators, and hypertension risk were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. A dominant genetic model (AC + CC) versus AA was applied for rs5186, and false discovery rate correction was used to account for multiple testing.
RESULTS :
The genotypes of rs5186 in the hypertension group were 55.4% AA, 43.1% AC, and 1.5% CC, whereas in the control group, they were 64.6% AA, 35.4% AC, and 0% CC. The differences in the genotype distribution were not statistically significant (p = 0.7). The AC + CC genotypes showed no significant association with hypertension after adjustment for confounders. Among biochemical factors, elevated blood glucose (>6.5 mmol/l) was strongly associated with hypertension, with a 6-fold increased risk compared to individuals with normal glucose levels (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The rs5186 was not significantly associated with hypertension in this cohort, whereas metabolic factors, particularly hyperglycemia and obesity, were strongly associated with increased hypertension risk. Larger studies are needed to confirm the role of rs5186 and to examine the consistency of effect sizes across different populations.
glucose
;
hypertension
;
PCR
;
SNPs
;
Vietnam
2.Ex vivo microscopic testicular sperm extraction at the time of radical orchiectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA): a scoping review.
Carlo GIULIONI ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Selahittin CAYAN
Asian Journal of Andrology 2025;27(3):416-422
Testicular tumor is the most common solid malignancy in males under 40 years of age. This malignancy is known to have a negative impact on male fertility. Therefore, several techniques for sperm retrieval have been proposed, including microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). The objective of this study was to review the literature on the outcomes of oncological (Onco)-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy. We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Only studies reporting ex vivo mTESE in patients with testicular tumor were considered. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Tumor size was identified as the sole preoperative factor influencing spermatogenesis. The considered studies demonstrated a satisfactory success rate for Onco-mTESE, associated with a similarly valid percentage of live healthy births through assisted reproductive technology. Currently, no comparison has been made between Onco-mTESE and conventional Onco-TESE, hence further assessment is required. In cases where the tumor completely replaces the cancer-bearing testicle, a contralateral micro-TESE may be a viable alternative. However, the surgeon should evaluate associated risks and benefits preoperatively. In conclusion, Onco-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy appears to be a promising therapeutic option for young patients with testicular tumors. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to achieve a definitive conclusion.
Humans
;
Male
;
Azoospermia/etiology*
;
Sperm Retrieval
;
Orchiectomy/methods*
;
Testicular Neoplasms/complications*
;
Microdissection/methods*
;
Testis/surgery*
;
Adult
3.Gemigliptin Alleviates Succinate Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells
Dinh-Vinh DO ; Giang NGUYEN ; So Young PARK ; Eun-Hee CHO
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(46):e304-
Background:
Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation is the principal event in the development of liver fibrosis in which succinate-G-protein coupled receptor 91 signaling has recently been shown to be a contributor. Moreover, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been reported to involve in HSC activation, but its association with succinate in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis remains scarce. In this study, we investigated the role of gemigliptin, an antidiabetic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in the succinate-induced ER stress and activation of HSCs.
Methods:
LX-2 cells, the immortalized human HSCs, were treated with succinate and gemigliptin. For animal experiments, C57BL/6N mice were divided into 3 groups: control diet, high-fat high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet, and HFHC diet mixed with gemigliptin.
Results:
Succinate significantly induced HSC activation and increased expression of inflammatory markers and the increase in the migration of HSCs. The treatment of succinate also caused ER dilation and activated the unfolded protein response signaling as protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase, eIF2alpha, binding immunoglobulin protein, suggesting increasing ER stress in HSCs. All responses of HSCs to succinate were attenuated with the co-treatment of gemigliptin. Moreover, the exposure of HSCs to tunicamycin, an inducer of ER stress, promoted the expression of α-smooth muscle actin, proliferation and migration of HSCs. In vivo, the level of fibrotic and ER stress markers was increased in mice fed with HFHC diet and the administration of gemigliptin improved these changes in HFHC-induced mice.
Conclusion
This study showed the involvement of ER stress in the activation of succinateinduced LX-2 HSCs and gemigliptin significantly reduced ER stress in HSC activation.Therefore, gemigliptin may become an anti-fibrotic agent and targeting to succinate and ER stress may be a promising therapeutic in the management of liver fibrosis.
4.Adiponectin restores the obesity-induced impaired immunomodulatory function of mesenchymal stromal cells via glycolytic reprogramming.
Duc-Vinh PHAM ; Thi-Kem NGUYEN ; Bao-Loc NGUYEN ; Jong-Oh KIM ; Jee-Heon JEONG ; Inho CHOI ; Pil-Hoon PARK
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2024;14(1):273-291
Obesity has been known to negatively modulate the life-span and immunosuppressive potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). However, it remains unclear what drives the compromised potency of obese MSC. In this study, we examined the involvement of adiponectin, an adipose tissue-derived hormone, in obesity-induced impaired therapeutic function of MSC. Diet-induced obesity leads to a decrease in serum adiponectin, accompanied by impairment of survival and immunomodulatory effects of adipose-derived MSC (ADSC). Interestingly, priming with globular adiponectin (gAcrp) improved the immunomodulatory potential of obese ADSC. Similar effects were also observed in lean ADSC. In addition, gAcrp potentiated the therapeutic effectiveness of ADSC in a mouse model of DSS-induced colitis. Mechanistically, while obesity inhibited the glycolytic capacity of MSC, gAcrp treatment induced a metabolic shift toward glycolysis through activation of adiponectin receptor type 1/p38 MAPK/hypoxia inducible factor-1α axis. These findings suggest that activation of adiponectin signaling is a promising strategy for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of MSC against immune-mediated disorders.
5.Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Nicholas TADROS ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(4):727-748
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.
Results:
Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.
Conclusions
This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
6.Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Nicholas TADROS ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(4):727-748
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.
Results:
Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.
Conclusions
This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
7.Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Nicholas TADROS ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(4):727-748
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.
Results:
Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.
Conclusions
This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
8.Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Nicholas TADROS ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(4):727-748
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.
Results:
Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.
Conclusions
This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
9.Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Priyank KOTHARI ; Nicholas TADROS ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ahmed HARRAZ ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(4):727-748
Purpose:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.
Results:
Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.
Conclusions
This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
10.Successful surgical interventions for a giant and complicated myoepithelial carcinoma: a case report
Quang Vinh VU ; Thanh Tuan HOANG ; Van Anh TRAN ; Thanh Hai TONG ; Hong Ha NGUYEN
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery 2024;25(4):197-200
Ethmoid myoepithelial carcinoma is a rare tumor, with only 14 cases reported to date. This report discusses the largest tumor of this type ever recorded in the ethmoid region. The tumor caused extensive damage to facial structures, complicating treatment. The patient’s age and comorbidities increased the risk of intraoperative bleeding, presenting challenges to the complete removal of the tumor and the reconstruction of the damaged structures. To reduce the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage, shorten the surgery time, and manage potential heartrelated complications, arterial embolization was performed using gelatin sponges and coils. Definitive surgery was then carried out using a skin flap and mucosal flap to successfully reconstruct the defect. Postoperative radiotherapy was deemed unnecessary. The patient recovered well, with a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. No recurrence was observed during a 3-year follow-up period.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail