1.From the operating room: Surgeons’ views on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Ritika AGARWAL ; Vinay M. D. PRABHU ; Nitin A. R. RAO
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):150-156
Background:
s/Aims: Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons’ perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results:
Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.
Conclusions
This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.
2.Neoadjuvant treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer:A systematic review
Peeyush VARSHNEY ; Saphalta BAGHMAR ; Bhawna SIROHI ; Ghassan K ABOU-ALFA ; Hop Tran CAO ; Lalit Mohan SHARMA ; Milind JAVLE ; Thorsten GOETZE ; Vinay K KAPOOR
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):113-120
Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) diagnosed post-histopathological examination of gallbladders removed assuming benign gallstone disease constitutes a significant proportion of GBC patients. Most iGBC patients present with early-stage disease. The standard care for localized (non-metastatic) iGBC includes a reoperation for complete extended (radical) cholecystectomy involving liver resection and lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy. However, a major drawback of this approach is the high recurrence rate within six months post-radical surgery, which undermines the benefits of the extensive procedure; notably, most recurrences are distant, highlighting the efficacy of systemic therapy. Similar to other gastrointestinal cancers, there appears to be a potential for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy) before reoperative surgery in iGBC cases. The premise that neoadjuvant systemic therapy aids in selecting diseases with more favorable biological characteristics and addresses micro-metastatic disease appears applicable to iGBC as well. This systematic review examines the current evidence supporting or refuting neoadjuvant therapy and discusses criteria for selecting patients who would derive significant benefit, along with proposing an optimal chemotherapy regimen for iGBC patients. Improved outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing reoperation after 4 to 14 weeks following the initial cholecystectomy compared to immediate reoperation. Limited, yet promising, evidence supports the use of 3 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to reoperative surgery in select high-risk iGBC cases.
3.From the operating room: Surgeons’ views on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Ritika AGARWAL ; Vinay M. D. PRABHU ; Nitin A. R. RAO
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):150-156
Background:
s/Aims: Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons’ perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results:
Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.
Conclusions
This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.
4.Neoadjuvant treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer:A systematic review
Peeyush VARSHNEY ; Saphalta BAGHMAR ; Bhawna SIROHI ; Ghassan K ABOU-ALFA ; Hop Tran CAO ; Lalit Mohan SHARMA ; Milind JAVLE ; Thorsten GOETZE ; Vinay K KAPOOR
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):113-120
Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) diagnosed post-histopathological examination of gallbladders removed assuming benign gallstone disease constitutes a significant proportion of GBC patients. Most iGBC patients present with early-stage disease. The standard care for localized (non-metastatic) iGBC includes a reoperation for complete extended (radical) cholecystectomy involving liver resection and lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy. However, a major drawback of this approach is the high recurrence rate within six months post-radical surgery, which undermines the benefits of the extensive procedure; notably, most recurrences are distant, highlighting the efficacy of systemic therapy. Similar to other gastrointestinal cancers, there appears to be a potential for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy) before reoperative surgery in iGBC cases. The premise that neoadjuvant systemic therapy aids in selecting diseases with more favorable biological characteristics and addresses micro-metastatic disease appears applicable to iGBC as well. This systematic review examines the current evidence supporting or refuting neoadjuvant therapy and discusses criteria for selecting patients who would derive significant benefit, along with proposing an optimal chemotherapy regimen for iGBC patients. Improved outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing reoperation after 4 to 14 weeks following the initial cholecystectomy compared to immediate reoperation. Limited, yet promising, evidence supports the use of 3 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to reoperative surgery in select high-risk iGBC cases.
5.From the operating room: Surgeons’ views on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Ritika AGARWAL ; Vinay M. D. PRABHU ; Nitin A. R. RAO
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):150-156
Background:
s/Aims: Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons’ perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results:
Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.
Conclusions
This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.
6.Neoadjuvant treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer:A systematic review
Peeyush VARSHNEY ; Saphalta BAGHMAR ; Bhawna SIROHI ; Ghassan K ABOU-ALFA ; Hop Tran CAO ; Lalit Mohan SHARMA ; Milind JAVLE ; Thorsten GOETZE ; Vinay K KAPOOR
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(2):113-120
Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) diagnosed post-histopathological examination of gallbladders removed assuming benign gallstone disease constitutes a significant proportion of GBC patients. Most iGBC patients present with early-stage disease. The standard care for localized (non-metastatic) iGBC includes a reoperation for complete extended (radical) cholecystectomy involving liver resection and lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy. However, a major drawback of this approach is the high recurrence rate within six months post-radical surgery, which undermines the benefits of the extensive procedure; notably, most recurrences are distant, highlighting the efficacy of systemic therapy. Similar to other gastrointestinal cancers, there appears to be a potential for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy) before reoperative surgery in iGBC cases. The premise that neoadjuvant systemic therapy aids in selecting diseases with more favorable biological characteristics and addresses micro-metastatic disease appears applicable to iGBC as well. This systematic review examines the current evidence supporting or refuting neoadjuvant therapy and discusses criteria for selecting patients who would derive significant benefit, along with proposing an optimal chemotherapy regimen for iGBC patients. Improved outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing reoperation after 4 to 14 weeks following the initial cholecystectomy compared to immediate reoperation. Limited, yet promising, evidence supports the use of 3 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to reoperative surgery in select high-risk iGBC cases.
7.Predicting late aortic complications after acute type A dissection surgery with volumetric measurements in a Singapore cohort.
Jasmine GE ; Vinay Bahadur PANDAY ; Siew-Pang CHAN ; Bernard WEE ; Julian Chi Leung WONG ; Leok Kheng Kristine TEOH ; Moe Thu SAN ; Carlos A MESTRES ; Theodoros KOFIDIS ; Vitaly A SOROKIN
Singapore medical journal 2025;66(9):469-475
INTRODUCTION:
This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic lumen volumes in predicting aortic-related complications following acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair.
METHODS:
We conducted a single-institution retrospective aortic volumetric analysis of patients after ascending aorta replacement performed during 2001-2015. The volumetric measurements of total lumen (total-L), true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL), as well as the TL:FL ratio from the first and second postoperative computer angiograms were obtained. A generalised structural equation model was created to analyse the predictive utility of TL:FL ratio.
RESULTS:
One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent surgical intervention, of whom 97 patients were eventually discharged and analysed for postoperative complications. A total of 19 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with late postoperative aortic complications had a significantly higher FL volume and total-L volume on the first (FL volume P = 0.041, total-L volume P = 0.05) and second (FL volume P = 0.01, total-L volume P = 0.007) postoperative scans. The odds of having aortic complications were raised by 1% with a 1 cm 3 increase in total-L volume and by 2% with a 1 cm 3 increase in FL volume. The TL:FL ratio was significantly lower in patients who developed complications.
CONCLUSION
Postoperative CT volumetric measurements in patients who developed complications are characterised by a significant increase in the FL volume and total-L volume from the first postoperative scans. Patients with disproportionately expanded FL presenting with TL:FL ratios less than 1 were associated with aortic complications. Hence, the TL:FL ratio may be a reliable and useful parameter to monitor postoperative disease progression and to evaluate the risk of late complications in ATAAD patients.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Singapore
;
Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging*
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging*
;
Aged
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging*
;
Aorta/surgery*
;
Adult
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Computed Tomography Angiography
8.Unraveling bioactive potential and production in Ganoderma lucidum through omics and machine learning modeling.
Sonali KHANAL ; Anand KUMAR ; Pankaj KUMAR ; Pratibha THAKUR ; Atul M CHANDER ; Rachna VERMA ; Ashwani TAPWAL ; Vinay CHAUHAN ; Dinesh KUMAR ; Deepak KUMAR
Chinese Herbal Medicines 2025;17(3):414-427
Ganoderma lucidum, a medicinal mushroom renowned for its production of a diverse array of compounds, accounts for the pharmacological effects including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anticancer characteristics. Thus, it is recognized as a valuable species of interest in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries due to its important medicinal properties. Recent advances in omics technologies such as genomes, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have considerably increased our understanding of the bioactives in G. lucidum. This review explores the application of molecular breeding techniques to enhance both the yield and quality of G. lucidum across the food, pharmaceutical, and industrial sectors. The article discusses the current state of research on the use of contemporary omics technologies which studies and highlights future research directions that may increase the production of bioactive compounds for their therapeutic potential. Additionally, predictive methods with computational studies have recently emerged as effective tools for investigating bioactive constituents in G. lucidum, providing an organized and cost-effective strategy for understanding their bioactivity, interactions, and possible therapeutic uses. Omics and machine learning techniques can be applied to identify the candidates for pharmaceutical applications and to enhance the production of bioactive compounds in G. lucidum. The quantification and production of the bioactive compounds can be streamlined by the integrating computational study of bioactive compounds with non-destructive predictive machine learning models of the same. Synergistically, these techniques have the potential to be a promising approach for the future prediction of the bioactive constituents, without compromising the integrity of the fungal organism.
9.Creating Novel Standards for Datapoints on an Elective Orthopaedic Theatre List Document
Raad M ; Virani S ; Vinay S ; Housden P
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2024;18(No.2):10-17
Introduction: Orthopaedic theatre lists are an important tool
which must convey essential information to all staff to run an
effective and safe theatre list. However, there are no set
standards or guidelines on the components of an Orthopaedic
theatre list. The objective of this study is to formulate
guidelines for elective Orthopaedic theatre lists which
improve efficiency and reduce errors.
Materials and methods: We looked at 326 elective
Orthopaedic theatre lists from October to November 2018.
Various factors such as: theatre and patient demographics,
surgical team, type of anaesthesia, Surgery, acronyms and
finally extra information such as allergies. Additionally, a
survey was distributed to a variety of theatre staff to
understand their requirements from a theatre list. Thereafter,
we created a proforma for waiting list coordinators.
Subsequently, we re-audited six more weeks of theatre lists
(255) from November to December 2019.
Results: The orthopaedic consultant in charge was noted for
100% of patients compared to 85% previously. There was an
improvement in documenting the required anaesthesia such
as noting 14.5% required spinal compared to 0.3%
previously. Prosthesis/equipment was mentioned for 34% of
patients compared to 23%. Fluoroscopy was noted as being
required for 25% of patients compared to 11%.
Conclusion: We believe standards should be in place in
order for us to follow to ensure we carry out safe and
efficient Orthopaedic theatre lists, and these standards
should entail the parameters we have audited. The ‘William
Harvey theatre list standard’ should be used as a gold
standard for all elective Orthopaedic theatre lists.
10.A rare cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding:Chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 mutation in a case from India
Shivani CHOPRA ; Vikramaditya RAWAT ; Meghraj INGLE ; Saiprasad LAD ; Mit SHAH ; Deepak SASIKUMAR ; Vinay BORKAR ; Yatin LUNAGARIYA ; Somraj PATIL
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2024;13(2):46-48
A 13-year-old boy presented with an 8-year history of repeated episodes of anemia. Laboratory investigations confirmed iron deficiency anemia due to occult blood loss from the gastrointestinal tract. Despite undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, and push enteroscopy, no abnormalities were detected. Subsequent computed tomography enterography also yielded normal results. However, a capsule endoscopy revealed multiple superficial ulcers in the jejunum and proximal ileum. Initially, the patient was treated for Crohn’s disease using various therapeutic approaches, all of which were unsuccessful. Further investigation led to a positive diagnosis for a rare condition known as chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 mutation (CEAS), marking the first reported case in India.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail