1.Temporalis Fascia and Free Post‐Aural Soft Tissue Graft in Sub‐Centimeter Skull Base Defect Repair
Journal of Rhinology 2025;32(1):55-59
Skull base defects often manifest as meningocele/meningoencephalocele or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Ventral and lateral skull base defects are effectively treated endoscopically and microscopically using various approaches. This case series study analyzes the utility and efficacy of post-aural soft tissue and temporalis fascia grafts in repairing small (<1 cm) skull base defects. Five out of six patients (83.33%) achieved successful defect closure. Patients were followed for donor site morbidity, postoperative CSF leak, and/or recurrent meningocele. One patient experienced reconstruction failure and developed a CSF leak eight months after surgery. The results suggest that TF grafts combined with post-aural soft tissue may be effectively used to repair small skull base defects without significant donor site morbidity.
2.Temporalis Fascia and Free Post‐Aural Soft Tissue Graft in Sub‐Centimeter Skull Base Defect Repair
Journal of Rhinology 2025;32(1):55-59
Skull base defects often manifest as meningocele/meningoencephalocele or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Ventral and lateral skull base defects are effectively treated endoscopically and microscopically using various approaches. This case series study analyzes the utility and efficacy of post-aural soft tissue and temporalis fascia grafts in repairing small (<1 cm) skull base defects. Five out of six patients (83.33%) achieved successful defect closure. Patients were followed for donor site morbidity, postoperative CSF leak, and/or recurrent meningocele. One patient experienced reconstruction failure and developed a CSF leak eight months after surgery. The results suggest that TF grafts combined with post-aural soft tissue may be effectively used to repair small skull base defects without significant donor site morbidity.
3.Temporalis Fascia and Free Post‐Aural Soft Tissue Graft in Sub‐Centimeter Skull Base Defect Repair
Journal of Rhinology 2025;32(1):55-59
Skull base defects often manifest as meningocele/meningoencephalocele or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Ventral and lateral skull base defects are effectively treated endoscopically and microscopically using various approaches. This case series study analyzes the utility and efficacy of post-aural soft tissue and temporalis fascia grafts in repairing small (<1 cm) skull base defects. Five out of six patients (83.33%) achieved successful defect closure. Patients were followed for donor site morbidity, postoperative CSF leak, and/or recurrent meningocele. One patient experienced reconstruction failure and developed a CSF leak eight months after surgery. The results suggest that TF grafts combined with post-aural soft tissue may be effectively used to repair small skull base defects without significant donor site morbidity.
4.Intranasal Scope Negotiation Trajectories for Flexible Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
Vijay BIDKAR ; Kalaiselvi SELVARAJ ; Amrusha RAIPURE ; Sandeep DABHEKAR ; Kiran Kumar PRATHIPATI ; Lisha SARODE
Journal of Rhinology 2024;31(3):156-161
Background and Objectives:
Flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (F-NPLS) is a routine procedure performed in office settings. We compared two different intranasal scope navigation techniques used during F-NPLS, evaluating patient comfort and practitioner satisfaction.
Methods:
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled study. Patients undergoing F-NPLS to evaluate the upper airway were enrolled and randomized into two study groups. Patients in group A underwent intranasal scope negotiation following a trajectory below the middle turbinate; for group B, a trajectory along the inferior turbinate was used. The primary outcome evaluated was the successful, unhindered negotiation of the scope on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes included patient-perceived pain, incidents of mucosal trauma and bleeding, and the frequency and necessity of repeat scopy.
Results:
In total, 111 patients were randomized into group A (n=53) and group B (n=58). Baseline characteristics, such as age and sex, were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the primary outcome (group A: 52.8% vs. group B: 55.2%, p=0.8). The frequency of F-NPLS without episodes of mucosal trauma was significantly higher in group B (group A: 56.9% vs. group B: 35.9%, p=0.004). Mucosal ecchymosis was a common finding in group A (group A: 41.5% vs. group B: 13.8%, p=0.03), while nasal bleeding was more frequently observed in group B, although the difference was not statistically significant (group A: 29.3% vs. group B: 22.6%, p=0.42).
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that the success rate of unhindered F-NPLS was comparable between the two trajectories. However, patients experienced moderate to severe pain during repeat scopy compared to the initial F-NPLS attempt.
5.Intranasal Scope Negotiation Trajectories for Flexible Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
Vijay BIDKAR ; Kalaiselvi SELVARAJ ; Amrusha RAIPURE ; Sandeep DABHEKAR ; Kiran Kumar PRATHIPATI ; Lisha SARODE
Journal of Rhinology 2024;31(3):156-161
Background and Objectives:
Flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (F-NPLS) is a routine procedure performed in office settings. We compared two different intranasal scope navigation techniques used during F-NPLS, evaluating patient comfort and practitioner satisfaction.
Methods:
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled study. Patients undergoing F-NPLS to evaluate the upper airway were enrolled and randomized into two study groups. Patients in group A underwent intranasal scope negotiation following a trajectory below the middle turbinate; for group B, a trajectory along the inferior turbinate was used. The primary outcome evaluated was the successful, unhindered negotiation of the scope on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes included patient-perceived pain, incidents of mucosal trauma and bleeding, and the frequency and necessity of repeat scopy.
Results:
In total, 111 patients were randomized into group A (n=53) and group B (n=58). Baseline characteristics, such as age and sex, were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the primary outcome (group A: 52.8% vs. group B: 55.2%, p=0.8). The frequency of F-NPLS without episodes of mucosal trauma was significantly higher in group B (group A: 56.9% vs. group B: 35.9%, p=0.004). Mucosal ecchymosis was a common finding in group A (group A: 41.5% vs. group B: 13.8%, p=0.03), while nasal bleeding was more frequently observed in group B, although the difference was not statistically significant (group A: 29.3% vs. group B: 22.6%, p=0.42).
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that the success rate of unhindered F-NPLS was comparable between the two trajectories. However, patients experienced moderate to severe pain during repeat scopy compared to the initial F-NPLS attempt.
6.Intranasal Scope Negotiation Trajectories for Flexible Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
Vijay BIDKAR ; Kalaiselvi SELVARAJ ; Amrusha RAIPURE ; Sandeep DABHEKAR ; Kiran Kumar PRATHIPATI ; Lisha SARODE
Journal of Rhinology 2024;31(3):156-161
Background and Objectives:
Flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (F-NPLS) is a routine procedure performed in office settings. We compared two different intranasal scope navigation techniques used during F-NPLS, evaluating patient comfort and practitioner satisfaction.
Methods:
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled study. Patients undergoing F-NPLS to evaluate the upper airway were enrolled and randomized into two study groups. Patients in group A underwent intranasal scope negotiation following a trajectory below the middle turbinate; for group B, a trajectory along the inferior turbinate was used. The primary outcome evaluated was the successful, unhindered negotiation of the scope on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes included patient-perceived pain, incidents of mucosal trauma and bleeding, and the frequency and necessity of repeat scopy.
Results:
In total, 111 patients were randomized into group A (n=53) and group B (n=58). Baseline characteristics, such as age and sex, were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the primary outcome (group A: 52.8% vs. group B: 55.2%, p=0.8). The frequency of F-NPLS without episodes of mucosal trauma was significantly higher in group B (group A: 56.9% vs. group B: 35.9%, p=0.004). Mucosal ecchymosis was a common finding in group A (group A: 41.5% vs. group B: 13.8%, p=0.03), while nasal bleeding was more frequently observed in group B, although the difference was not statistically significant (group A: 29.3% vs. group B: 22.6%, p=0.42).
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that the success rate of unhindered F-NPLS was comparable between the two trajectories. However, patients experienced moderate to severe pain during repeat scopy compared to the initial F-NPLS attempt.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail