Background: Skull base defects, accidental or planned during tumor resections, present significant reconstructive challenges. Effective repair prevents cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, meningitis, and pneumocephalus. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed 26 patients with anterior or lateral skull base defects treated between 2018 and 2024 at a tertiary care center in Western India. Both planned iatrogenic and accidental intraoperative defects were included. Patient demographics, surgical approach, defect characteristics, reconstruction techniques, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. All patients underwent multilayered repair with tailored perioperative management, including selective lumbar drainage. Results: Among 26 patients, 14 (53.8%) had anterior and 12 (46.2%) had lateral skull base defects. Intraoperative CSF leak occurred in 11 patients (42.3%). Defects were repaired using combinations of autologous tissue (fat, fascia lata, muscle), allogenic grafts (DuraGen), and vascularized flaps. Seven patients (26.9%) required lumbar drains. All reconstructions were successful with no secondary failures. However, two major complications were observed: one case of pneumocephalus and one of postoperative vision loss following ossifying fibroma excision. No postoperative meningitis or recurrent CSF leaks were noted. Conclusion Meticulous multilayered repair strategies and structured perioperative protocols provide excellent outcomes in skull base defect reconstruction. Differentiating between planned and accidental iatrogenic defects allows for better preoperative planning and individualized management. Despite a 100% repair success rate, rare but serious complications such as vision loss highlight the need for careful surgical technique near critical neurovascular structures.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative oral prednisolone improves the intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes over a 3-month period in patients of sinonasal polyposis who undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: In a triple-blind, randomized controlled study, 43 patients diagnosed with sinonasal polyposis in the Department of ENT, AIIMS, Jodhpur, were enrolled. After obtaining institutional ethics clearance and registering the clinical trial, randomization was conducted to assign participants into experimental and control groups. Preoperatively, patients were assessed using the clinical severity score (Sino-nasal Outcome Test; SNOT-22), radiological severity score (Lund-Mackay score), and endoscopic severity scores (discharge-inflammation-polyp [DIP] score and Lund-Kennedy score). Intraoperative assessment was done using the Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score, the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and visual analog scale for visual field during surgery and for the ease of disease removal. Postoperatively, at 3 months all the preoperative parameters were reassessed, and, using independent t-test, comparison was made between the two groups. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the experimental group (48%), and 22 in the control group (51%). Although the mean duration of surgery in the experimental group was shorter than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, although the postoperative SNOT-22 score was lower in the experimental group compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups across any of the parameters assessed. Conclusion Although the role of oral steroids has been established in the treatment of sinonasal polyposis, our study did not find any significant difference between the group that received oral steroids prior to surgery and the group that received placebo.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative oral prednisolone improves the intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes over a 3-month period in patients of sinonasal polyposis who undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: In a triple-blind, randomized controlled study, 43 patients diagnosed with sinonasal polyposis in the Department of ENT, AIIMS, Jodhpur, were enrolled. After obtaining institutional ethics clearance and registering the clinical trial, randomization was conducted to assign participants into experimental and control groups. Preoperatively, patients were assessed using the clinical severity score (Sino-nasal Outcome Test; SNOT-22), radiological severity score (Lund-Mackay score), and endoscopic severity scores (discharge-inflammation-polyp [DIP] score and Lund-Kennedy score). Intraoperative assessment was done using the Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score, the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and visual analog scale for visual field during surgery and for the ease of disease removal. Postoperatively, at 3 months all the preoperative parameters were reassessed, and, using independent t-test, comparison was made between the two groups. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the experimental group (48%), and 22 in the control group (51%). Although the mean duration of surgery in the experimental group was shorter than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, although the postoperative SNOT-22 score was lower in the experimental group compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups across any of the parameters assessed. Conclusion Although the role of oral steroids has been established in the treatment of sinonasal polyposis, our study did not find any significant difference between the group that received oral steroids prior to surgery and the group that received placebo.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative oral prednisolone improves the intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes over a 3-month period in patients of sinonasal polyposis who undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: In a triple-blind, randomized controlled study, 43 patients diagnosed with sinonasal polyposis in the Department of ENT, AIIMS, Jodhpur, were enrolled. After obtaining institutional ethics clearance and registering the clinical trial, randomization was conducted to assign participants into experimental and control groups. Preoperatively, patients were assessed using the clinical severity score (Sino-nasal Outcome Test; SNOT-22), radiological severity score (Lund-Mackay score), and endoscopic severity scores (discharge-inflammation-polyp [DIP] score and Lund-Kennedy score). Intraoperative assessment was done using the Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score, the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and visual analog scale for visual field during surgery and for the ease of disease removal. Postoperatively, at 3 months all the preoperative parameters were reassessed, and, using independent t-test, comparison was made between the two groups. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the experimental group (48%), and 22 in the control group (51%). Although the mean duration of surgery in the experimental group was shorter than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, although the postoperative SNOT-22 score was lower in the experimental group compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups across any of the parameters assessed. Conclusion Although the role of oral steroids has been established in the treatment of sinonasal polyposis, our study did not find any significant difference between the group that received oral steroids prior to surgery and the group that received placebo.