OBJECTIVE: Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common form of strabismus that warrants standardized management for better and predictable outcomes. Currently there are no preferred practice guidelines on the non-surgical management of IXT. Among the aforementioned methods, orthoptics is the most favored by optometrists and ophthalmologists based in China and Israel. However, consensus statements on the use of such modality are yet to be established. This study aimed to identify preferred non-surgical management strategies for intermittent exotropia (IXT) among members of the Philippine Society of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (PSPOS). METHODS: The survey collected data on respondent and patient demographics, perceived causes of IXT, clinical course, and management preferences. Incomplete responses were excluded, and data were analyzed using frequency distribution and the Fisher test. RESULTS: Forty of 54 (74%) PSPOS members participated, predominantly from urban settings (34 respondents). Most IXT cases were children aged 4 to 11 years. The proportion of pediatric patients was not significantly influenced by respondents’ age (p=0.1628) or practice region (p=0.451). Twenty-one (52.5%) respondents cited fusion defects as the primary cause of IXT. While twenty-one noted an unpredictable course, 14 identified it as a progressive course. Overminus lenses were preferred for younger patients (1-4 years), with an increasing preference for orthoptics in older age groups (5 to>18 years). Pediatric ophthalmologists aged 30 to 40 years (p=0.005) and those with 1 to 5 years of experience (p=0.020) favored overminus lenses for 5-10-year-olds. Preference for overminus lenses was stronger outside the NCR (p=0.044). Furthermore, 90% of respondents said surgery shouldn’t be performed at diagnosis, and 42.5% of respondents were against it for younger ages. CONCLUSION The findings revealed a strong preference for overminus lenses among PSPOS members, with increasing use of orthoptics for older patients. Factors influencing management decisions included respondent age, practice region, and perceptions of IXT’s cause and course. Future randomized controlled trials are essential to evaluate non-surgical interventions and develop comprehensive treatment guidelines.
Human ; ophthalmology ; strabismus ; exotropia

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the anatomical dimensions of the buccal bone walls of the aesthetic maxillary region for immediate implant placement, based upon cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in a sample of adult patients. METHODS: Two calibrated examiners analyzed a sample of 50 CBCT scans, performing morphometric analyses of both incisors and canines on the left and right sides. Subsequently, in the sagittal view, a line was traced through the major axis of the selected tooth. Then, a second line (E) was traced from the buccal to the palatal wall at the level of the observed bone ridges. The heights of the buccal and palatal bone ridges were determined at the major axis of the tooth. The buccal bone thickness was measured across five lines. The first was at the level of line E. The second was at the most apical point of the tooth, and the other three lines were equidistant between the apical and the cervical lines, and parallel to them. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of P< or =0.05 for the bone thickness means and standard deviations per tooth and patient for the five lines at varying depths. RESULTS: The means of the buccal wall thicknesses in the central incisors, lateral incisors and canines were 1.14+/-0.65 mm, 0.95+/-0.67 mm and 1.15+/-0.68 mm, respectively. Additionally, only on the left side were significant differences in some measurements of buccal bone thickness observed according to age and gender. However, age and gender did not show significant differences in heights between the palatal and buccal plates. In a few cases, the buccal wall had a greater height than the palatal wall. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 10% of sites showed more than a 2-mm thickness of the buccal bone wall, with the exception of the central incisor region, wherein 14.4% of cases were > or =2 mm.
Adult ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Incisor ; Tooth