C5 palsy (C5P) is a common, yet poorly understood complication of cervical decompressive surgery, causing substantial disability and impacting postoperative quality of life. Despite extensive research, the actual incidence and distribution of C5P across different cervical surgical approaches over the past decade remain unclear. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, across Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies reporting C5P incidence following surgery for degenerative cervical conditions, published until 2024, were included, excluding reviews, opinions, letters, and non-English manuscripts. Ninety-seven articles were included, encompassing 21,231 patients undergoing decompressive cervical surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The overall incidence of postoperative C5P was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%–10%). The highest incidence was observed with circumferential fusion (combined anterior-posterior approach) at 16% (95% CI, 8%–24%), while the lowest was with anterior cervical decompression and fusion at 4% (95% CI, 3%–5%). Incidence rates following laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion were 6% (95% CI, 5%–7%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%–12%), respectively. Recovery time ranged from 20.9 to 35 weeks, with 19.1%–33% of patients experiencing residual weakness. Significant risk factors included male sex, preoperative intervertebral foraminal stenosis, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, open-door laminoplasty, laminectomy (with/without fusion), and excessive spinal cord shift. The role of C4–5 foraminotomy remains contested. Our meta-analysis identifies the posterior surgical approach as a significant risk factor for C5P. Circumferential fusion poses the highest risk, while laminoplasty can reduce the risk compared to laminectomy (alone or with instrumented fusion).

Despite the favorable postoperative prognosis of C5 palsy (C5P), a certain proportion of these patients have less satisfactory outcomes. The current systematic review and meta-analysis thus aimed to comprehensively evaluate existing literature and identify the onset, recovery patterns, and outcomes of C5P following diverse surgical approaches. Five different databases (Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were thoroughly searched for relevant literature on October 15, 2024. Studies reporting on incidences of C5P following surgery for degenerative cervical conditions with recovery data published until 2024 were scrutinized. Narrative or systematic reviews, opinions, letters to the editor, and manuscripts published in non-English languages were excluded. A total of 30 articles involving 8,116 patients who underwent undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy with 748 reported C5P cases were included for analysis. The overall time to palsy reported in the included studies was 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.56–3.60). Palsy occurred earliest with anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) at 2 days (95% CI, 0.35–4.54), followed by laminoplasty (LP) at 3.2 days (95% CI, 2.02–4.34) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) at 3.6 days (95% CI, 2.81–4.37). Patients with palsy showed improved recovery with time. At the 1-year follow-up, the reported recovery rates were 100%, 52.9%, and 50% for ACDF, LP, and PCDF, respectively. C5P demonstrated a delayed presentation, with mean onset of 3 days after surgery, which can range from 2 days for ACDF to 3.6 days for PDCF. Recovery improved progressively with time and varied for different surgical procedures, with ACDF showing the best recovery and PDCF for cervical myelopathy showing the poorest recovery.

Methods: Data regarding patients, who underwent PFD for ACM-I presenting with SM and scoliosis between January 2009 and December 2018, were retrospectively collected. Only patients with 2-year follow-up were included. Sagittal/coronal deformity and sagittal spinopelvic parameters were examined. Symmetry and extent of tonsillar descent, as well as morphology (configuration/variation) and extent of syrinx were determined. Results: A total of 42 patients (20 females; age: 14.2±5.8 years) were included; 35 patients (83.3%) had atypical curves. Mean preoperative coronal Cobb was 57.7°±20.9°; and 12 (28.6%) had significant coronal imbalance. Tonsillar descent was classified as grade 1, 2, and 3 in 16 (38.1%), 11 (26.2%), and 15 (35.7%) patients; 35 patients (83.3%) had asymmetric tonsillar descent; 17 (40.4%), 3 (7.1%), 16 (38.1%), and 6 (14.4%) had circumscribed, moniliform, dilated, and slender syrinx patterns; and 9 (21.4%), 12 (28.6%), and 21 (50%) of syrinx were right-sided, left-sided, and centric. There was no significant relationship between side of tonsillar dominance (p =0.31), grade of descent (p =0.30), and convexity of deformity. There was significant association between side of syrinx and convexity of scoliosis (p =0.01). PFD was performed in all, and deformity correction was performed in 23 patients. In curves ≤40°, PFD alone could stabilize scoliosis progression (p =0.02). There was significant reduction in syrinx/cord ratio following PFD (p <0.001). Conclusions ACM-I+SM patients had atypical curve patterns in 83% of cases, and the side of syrinx deviation correlates with scoliosis convexity. Syrinx shrinks significantly following PFD. PFD may not stabilize scoliosis in curves >40°.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly affected all specialty practices in medicine, including the field of spinal surgery. Spinal surgery is unique in that the procedures include not only fully elective and fully emergent interventions, but also involve a separate group of semi-emergent surgeries, where delayed intervention may lead to permanent neurological deficits. Here, we present an evidence-based review on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spinal surgery and our current knowledge about this issue. We conducted a thorough search of the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases using the keywords, “COVID-19,” “COVID-19 impact on spine surgery,” “coronavirus impact on spine surgery,” “COVID-19 impact on neurosurgery,” “coronavirus impact on neurosurgery,” “COVID-19 impact on spine surgeons,” and “coronavirus impact on spine surgeons” on May 6, 2020. A total of 8,322 articles were identified in the initial search. Articles that were duplicated, those that did not pertain to COVID-19 or spine surgeries, those with details not pertaining to the current topic of interest, and those published in languages other than English were excluded from our analyses. After complete screening, six articles were included in this review. During the previous few weeks, the COVID pandemic has significantly influenced all major aspects of spine surgery across the world. Outpatient care has been gradually shifted from physical visits to tele-health and online consultations. General recommendations have favored the conservative approach over surgeries, although no patient should be deprived of standard care owing to concerns about COVID. The general principles followed by spine surgeons should include early detection of COVID symptomatology; triaging of patients based on underlying spinal pathology; prescription of appropriate investigations to confirm the COVID status; isolation, as needed; selection of optimal management method as per the guidelines; adherence to best intraoperative practices; and ensuring protective measures for non-infected patients, family members, fellow heath care providers, and themselves against the disease.

Methods: A total of 30 sets of images, including plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans, were randomly selected from our hospital patient database. All patients had undergone deformity correction surgery for kyphosis. Twelve spine surgeons from the Asia-Pacific region (six different countries) independently evaluated and classified the deformity types and proposed their surgical recommendations. This information was then compared with standard deformity classification and surgical recommendations. Results: The kappa coefficients for the classification were as follows: 0.88 for type 1A, 0.78 for type 1B, 0.50 for type 2B, 0.40 for type 3A, 0.63 for type 3B, and 0.86 for type 3C deformities. The overall kappa coefficient for the classification was 0.68. Regarding the repeatability of osteotomy recommendations, kappa values were the highest for Ponte’s (Schwab type 2) osteotomy (kappa 0.8). Kappa values for other osteotomy recommendations were 0.52 for pedicle subtraction/disc-bone osteotomy (Schwab type 3/4), 0.42 for vertebral column resection (VCR, type 5), and 0.30 for multilevel VCRs (type 6). Conclusions Excellent accuracy was found for types 1A, 1B, and 3C deformities (ends of spectrum). There was more variation among surgeons in differentiating between one-column (types 2A and 2B) and two-column (types 3A and 3B) deficiencies, as surgeons often failed to recognize the radiological signs of posterior column failure. This failure to identify column deficiencies can potentially alter kyphosis management. There was excellent consensus among surgeons in the recommendation of type 2 osteotomy; however, some variation was observed in their choice for other osteotomies.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The study was aimed at evaluating clinicoradiological factors affecting recovery of neurological deficits in cases of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated by lumbar microdiscectomy. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The majority of the available literature on neurological recovery following neurodeficit is limited to retrospective series. The literature is currently limited regarding variables that can help predict the recovery of neurodeficits following LDH. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 70 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy (L1–2 to L5–S1) owing to neurological deficits due to LDH. Patients with motor power ≤3/5 in L2–S1 myotomes were considered for analysis. Follow-up was performed at 2, 6, and 12 months to note recovery of motor deficits. Clinicoradiological parameters were compared between the recovered and nonrecovered groups. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were available at the final follow-up: 41 (63%) had completely recovered by 2 months; four showed delayed recovery at the 6-month follow-up; and 20 (30.7%) showed no recovery at 1 year. Clinicoradiological factors, including diabetes, complete initial deficit, areflexia, multilevel disc prolapse, longer duration since initial symptoms, and ≥2 previous symptomatic episodes were associated with a significant risk of poorer recovery (p < 0.05 for all). Age, sex, occupation, smoking, level/type or location of disc herniation, primary canal stenosis, disc fragment dimensions, precipitating factors, bladder involvement, bilaterality of symptoms, and the presence or absence of anal reflex did not affect neurological recovery (p>0.05 for all). Diabetes mellitus (p=0.033) and complete initial motor deficit (p=0.028) were significantly associated with delayed recovery in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The overall neurological recovery rate in our study was 69%. Diabetes mellitus (p=0.033) and complete initial motor deficit were associated with delayed motor recovery.
Cohort Studies ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neurologic Manifestations ; Occupations ; Precipitating Factors ; Prognosis ; Prolapse ; Prospective Studies ; Reflex ; Retrospective Studies ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Urinary Bladder

STUDY DESIGN: Radiological cohort study. PURPOSE: The options of posteriorly stabilizing C7 vertebra include using lateral mass, pedicle or lamina, as bony anchors. The current study is a computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric analysis of C7 vertebra of 100 Indian patients and discusses the feasibility of these different techniques. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: C7 is a peculiar vertebra with unique anatomy, which poses challenges for each of these fixation modalities. There are no reports available in the literature, which discuss and compare the feasibility of diverse posterior C7 fixation techniques in Indian population. METHODS: We included 100 consecutive cervical spine CT scans of Indian patients performed between July 2016 and September 2016. We excluded CT scans with any significant congenital anomaly or other pathological lesions of C7 and patients with non-Indian ethnicity. Regarding screw placement, we assessed and studied various dimensions of the C7 lateral mass, pedicles, and laminae in relevant sections. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 49.5±16.1 years. We included 56 male and 44 female patients. The mean anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of the lateral mass were 11.38±1.76 and 12.91±1.82 mm, respectively. The mean length of the lateral mass screw (Magerl technique) was 12.17±1.9 mm; 92% of patients could accommodate a lateral mass screw at least 10-mm long (unicortical), whereas 48% could accommodate a screw (unicortical) longer than 12 mm. Foramen transversarium was found in 30.5% of lateral masses. The mean outer and inner cortical widths of the pedicles were 6.5±0.71 mm and 3.72±0.61 mm, respectively. Approximately 58% of pedicles could accommodate 3.5-mm screws (based on the inner cortical pedicle width). The outer cortical and inner cortical widths of the laminae were 6.21±1.2 mm and 3.23±0.9 mm, respectively. Subsequently, 37% of the laminae could accommodate 3.5-mm screws. The mean angle of intralaminar screw trajectory was 50.7°±5.1°, and the mean length of the intralaminar screw was 32.6±3.05 mm. In addition, 96.4% and 60.7% of male patients could accommodate lateral mass screws longer than 10 mm and 12 mm, respectively. However, only 86.4% and 31.8% of female patients could accommodate 10- and 12-mm long lateral mass screws, respectively. Furthermore, 75% of male patients and 36% of female patients had pedicles that could accommodate 3.5-mm diameter screws, and 48.2% of male patients had laminae that could accommodate 3.5-mm screws; however, only 22.7% of female patients could accommodate 3.5-mm laminar screws. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our CT-guided morphometric analysis, 92% and 48% of Indian patients could accommodate at least 10- and 12-mm long lateral mass screws, and 58% of pedicles and 37% of laminae could accommodate 3.5-mm screws. Thus, lateral mass screws (between 10- and 12-mm long) seem to be the safest feasible option for C7 fixation. In case of the need for an alternative mode of stabilization (pedicle or intralaminar screw), particularly in female patients, careful preoperative planning with a CT scan is of utmost importance.
Cervical Vertebrae ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pedicle Screws ; Spine ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed