This study aims to establish a time-resolved fluorescence immunochromatography method for simultaneous determination of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E6 and L1 protein concentrations. The amount of lanthanide microsphere-labeled antibodies, the concentration of coated antibodies, and the reaction time were optimized, and then a test strip for the simultaneous determination of the protein concentrations was prepared. The performance of the detection method was evaluated based on the concordance of the results from clinical practice. The optimal conditions were 8 μg and 10 μg of HPV16 L1 and E6-labeled antibodies, respectively, 1.5 mg/mL coated antibodies, and reaction for 10 min. The detection with the established method for L1 and E6 proteins showed the linear ranges of 5-320 ng/mL and 2-64 ng/mL and the lowest limits of detection of 1.78 ng/mL and 1.09 ng/mL, respectively. There was no cross reaction with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), treponema pallidum (TP), or HPV18 E6 and L1 proteins. The average recovery rate of the established method was between 97% and 107%. The test strip prepared in this study showed the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 97.46%, 90.57%, and 95.32%, respectively, in distinguishing patients with cervical cancer and precancerous lesions from healthy subjects, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.980 1 and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 0.956 5 to 1.000 0. The time-resolved fluorescence immunochromatography combined with the test strips prepared in this study showed high sensitivity, high accuracy, simple operation, and rapid reaction in the quantitation of HPV16 E6 and L1 proteins. It thus can be used as an auxiliary method for the diagnosis and early screening of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions and the assessment of disease course.
Oncogene Proteins, Viral/immunology* ; Humans ; Chromatography, Affinity/methods* ; Female ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; Repressor Proteins/immunology* ; Capsid Proteins/immunology* ; Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis* ; Fluorescence ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology*

ObjectiveHuman papilloma virus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and is also closely related to penile cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, and anal cancer in males. However, few studies are reported on male HPV. This study aimed to investigate HPV infection of the external genitalia in men whose female partners have cervical HPV infection.

METHODSWe collected the relevant data on the male outpatients whose partners had cervical HPV infection in our Department of Urology and Andrology from August to December 2016. We obtained samples with nylon swabs from the glans penis, corona, inner layer of the prepuce and penile body and detected different types of HPV infection using the Hybribio HPV typing kit, PCR and membrane hybridization.

RESULTSValid data were collected from 140 males, which showed 83.5% of HPV infection of the external genitalia, including 60 cases of HPV6 (43.2%), 27 cases of HPV16 (19.4%), 14 cases of HPV39 (10.1%), 13 cases of HPV18 (9.4%), 13 cases of HPV58 (9.4%), and 13 cases of HPV52 (9.4%). Redundant prepuce was found in 75.5% of the males, but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of HPV infection between the normal and redundant prepuce groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMen who have the female partners with positive cervical HPV are at high risk of HPV infection and therefore need to be screened and treated so as to reduce HPV infection in both sexes.

Female ; Foreskin ; virology ; Genital Diseases, Female ; virology ; Genital Diseases, Male ; virology ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; isolation & purification ; Humans ; Male ; Papillomaviridae ; isolation & purification ; Papillomavirus Infections ; diagnosis ; Penile Neoplasms ; virology ; Penis ; abnormalities ; virology ; Phimosis ; virology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Sexual Partners ; Specimen Handling ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; virology

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression of claudin 4 (CLDN4) in cervical tissues from patients with different cervical lesions, and to explore the value of combined detection of CLDN4 and high risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV). METHODS: The cervical tissue specimens of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL, =30), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, =30), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, =30) as well as chronic cervicitis (control, =30) were collected from the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University during June 2015 and December 2016. The expression of CLDN4 protein in tissue specimens was detected by immunohistochemistry, HR-HPV was detected by real-time quantitative PCR, and the cervical exfoliated cells were examined by thinprep cytologic test (TCT). The ROC curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of TCT combined with HR-HPV and CLDN4 combined with HR-HPV tests for HSIL and SCC of the cervix. RESULTS: With the increase of the severity of cervical lesions, the positive rate of CLDN4 expression rose (=0.832, <0.05). Positivity of both HR-HPV infection and CLDN4 expression was found mainly in the HSIL and SCC groups. The areas under curve (AUC) of TCT combined with HR-HPV and CLDN4 combined with HR-HPV tests for diagnosis of HSIL and SCC were 0.683 and 0.633, respectively; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of TCT combined with HR-HPV test for diagnosis of HSIL and SCC were 100.0%, 36.7%, 61.2%, 100.0% and 46.7% respectively; those of CLDN4 combined with HR-HPV test were 96.7%, 30.0%, 58.0%, 90.0% and 55.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CLDN4 expression may be related to the occurrence and development of cervical carcinoma and precancerous lesions. CLDN4 combined with HR-HPV test may be used for diagnosis of HSIL and SCC of the cervix clinically.
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; diagnosis ; virology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; diagnosis ; virology ; Claudin-4 ; genetics ; metabolism ; Female ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Humans ; Immunochemistry ; Papillomaviridae ; isolation & purification ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix ; virology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; diagnosis

Cervical cancer is a complex disease caused by both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. Inherited genomic variance, high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) infection/integration, genome methylation and somatic mutation could all constitute one machine learning model, laying the ground for molecular classification and the precision medicine of cervical cancer. Therefore, for cervical screening, next generation sequencing (NGS)-based HPV DNA and other molecular tests as well as dynamic machine learning models would accurately predict patients with potential to develop the cancer, thereby reducing the burden of repeated screening. Meantime, genome-editing tools targeting HPV would emerge as the next generation gene therapy for HPV-related cervical lesions. In this article, we review the substantial progress on molecular mechanism of cervical cancer development and suggest the future for precise prevention and early treatment of cervical cancer.
Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Papillomaviridae ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; prevention & control ; therapy ; virology

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a pooled analysis of published studies to compare the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytology in detecting residual or recurrent diseases after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3). METHODS: Source articles presenting data on posttreatment HPV testing were identified from the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) database. We included 5,319 cases from 33 articles published between 1996 and 2013. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity of high-risk HPV testing (0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 0.94) for detecting posttreatment CIN 2 or worse (CIN 2+) was much higher than that of cytology (0.76; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.80). Co-testing of HPV testing and cytology maximized the sensitivity (0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96), while HPV genotyping (detection of the same genotype between pre- and posttreatments) did not improve the sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.94) compared with high-risk HPV testing alone. The specificity of high-risk HPV testing (0.83; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.84) was similar to that of cytology (0.85; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.87) and HPV genotyping (0.83; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.85), while co-testing had reduced specificity (0.76; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.78). For women with positive surgical margins, high-risk HPV testing provided remarkable risk discrimination between test-positives and test-negatives (absolute risk of residual CIN 2+ 74.4% [95% CI, 64.0 to 82.6] vs. 0.8% [95% CI, 0.15 to 4.6]; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings recommend the addition of high-risk HPV testing, either alone or in conjunction with cytology, to posttreatment surveillance strategies. HPV testing can identify populations at greatest risk of posttreatment CIN 2+ lesions, especially among women with positive section margins.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/pathology/surgery/*virology ; Female ; Humans ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*virology ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Papillomaviridae/*isolation & purification ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications/*diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Assessment/methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology/surgery/*virology

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, and the human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main causative agent for its development. HPV is a heterogeneous virus, and a persistent infection with a high-risk HPV contributes to the development of cancer. In recent decades, great advances have been made in understanding the molecular biology of HPV, and HPV\'s significance in cervical cancer prevention and management has received increased attention. In this review, we discuss the role of HPV genotyping in cervical cancer by addressing: clinically important issues in HPV virology; the current application of HPV genotyping in clinical medicine; and potential future uses for HPV genotyping.
DNA, Viral/*analysis ; Early Detection of Cancer/*methods ; Female ; *Genome, Viral ; Genotype ; Humans ; Papillomaviridae/classification/*genetics ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications/drug therapy/*virology ; Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis/drug therapy/*virology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic implication of human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load in cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with stage IA2 through stage IIIA cervical carcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2005 and December 2009. Patients who had undergone preoperative hybrid capture 2 testing to detect HPV DNA were included. A total of 346 patients positive for HPV DNA were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to the median HPV viral load. RESULTS: HPV viral load was significantly correlated with lymphovascular space invasion (p=0.026) and deep stromal invasion (p=0.024). However, other factors, such as age, stage, histologic grade, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size, were not significantly associated with viral load. Low HPV viral load was correlated with poor disease-free survival in univariate analysis (p=0.037) and multivariate analysis (p=0.027). There was no significant difference in overall survival with regard to initial HPV viral load. CONCLUSION: Low initial HPV viral load may be a poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients who have undergone radical hysterectomy.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Papillomaviridae/*isolation & purification ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications/diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; *Viral Load ; Young Adult

In 2013, 10 topics were selected for major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology; these included three topics regarding cervical cancer, three regarding ovarian cancer, two regarding endometrial cancer, and one each regarding breast cancer and radiation oncology. For cervical cancer, bevacizumab was first demonstrated to exhibit outstanding clinical efficacy in a recurrent, metastatic setting. Regarding cervical cancer screening, visual inspections with acetic acid in low-resource settings, p16/Ki-67 double staining, and the follow-up results of four randomized controlled trials of human papillomavirus-based screening methods were reviewed. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer was the final topic for cervical cancer. Regarding front-line ovarian cancer therapies, dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and other targeted agents administered according to combination or maintenance schedules were discussed. Regarding recurrent ovarian cancer treatment, cediranib, olaparib, and farletuzumab were discussed for platinum-sensitive disease. The final overall survival data associated with a combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy for platinum-resistant disease were briefly summarized. For endometrial cancer, the potential clinical efficacy of metformin, an antidiabetic drug, in obese patients was followed by integrated genomic analyses from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. For breast cancer, three remarkable advances were reviewed: the long-term effects of continued adjuvant tamoxifen for 10 years, the effects of 2-year versus 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease, and the approval of pertuzumab in a neoadjuvant setting with a pathologic complete response as the surrogate endpoint. Finally, the recent large studies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer were briefly summarized.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Biomedical Research/*methods ; Early Detection of Cancer/methods ; Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms, Female/*therapy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/methods ; Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications/diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis/virology

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of APTIMA human papillomavirus (AHPV) assay and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay in screening for cervical disease, especially in women with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). METHODS: A total of 411 women diagnosed with ASC-US or LSIL were referred and further triaged by HC2 test. Prior to colposcopy, liquid-based cytology specimens were collected for the AHPV assay. Sensitivity and specificity were established based on the histological findings of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). RESULTS: In all 411 subjects, the positive detection rate of AHPV assay was 70.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.4 to 75.2), which was significantly lower than the positive detection rate of 94.9% obtained using HC2 test (95% CI, 92.3 to 96.8). Only one CIN 3-positive case was detected among the 120 AHPV-negative women, which was then confirmed by Pap smear test to be LSIL. The sensitivities of AHPV and HC2 for CIN 3 were similar (94.1% and 100%, respectively). However, AHPV showed a significantly higher specificity than HC2 test (30.2% and 5.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: AHPV assay is effective in identifying CIN 3-positive cases because of its high specificity and lower false-negative rate. The use of AHPV for the triage of ASC-US and LSIL might help to reduce the referral rate of colposcopy during cervical cancer screening.
Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/*diagnosis/epidemiology/virology ; China/epidemiology ; Colposcopy/methods ; Early Detection of Cancer/methods ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests/*methods ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications/*diagnosis/epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Triage ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*diagnosis/epidemiology/virology ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the diagnostic performance of different specimens for detecting CIN2(+), and to find the solution of the problem that why the performance of self-collected specimen is worse than cervical specimen collected by physician.

METHODSThe cervix, lower 1/3 vagina, upper 1/3 vagina and self-collected specimens from each of the 806 women who took part in this multi-center screening program from May 2006 to April 2007 were tested by hybrid capture 2 (HC2) technique. The diagnostic performance of HC2 on the four specimens for detecting CIN2(+) lesions was calculated. Linear array was performed on the four specimens from 489 out of the 806 women and the diagnostic performance of linear array on the four specimens for detecting CIN2(+) lesions was also calculated. Z test was used to compare the area under ROC and McNemar or χ(2) test was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of different specimens.

RESULTSThe area under ROC of the cervix, 1/3 upper vagina, 1/3 lower vagina and self-collected samples testing by HC2 for detecting CIN2(+) lesions were 0.902, 0.793, 0.769 and 0.773, respectively (P < 0.001). Using 1 RUL/CO as the cut-point of HC2, the sensitivity of the cervix, upper vagina, lower vagina and self-collected samples were 98.0%, 91.8%, 83.7% and 81.6%. Compared with the cervical specimen, the sensitivity of self-collected specimen for detecting CIN2(+) lesions was significantly lower (P = 0.008). Lowering the cutoff value for HC2 test could improve the sensitivity of self-collected specimen, but it significantly compromised the specificity. The sensitivity of self-collected specimen tested by linear array for detecting CIN2(+) lesions was 95.7% and it was not significantly different compared with the sensitivity of cervical specimen (97.9%) tested by HC2.

CONCLUSIONSThe performance of self-collected specimen tested by HC2 for detecting CIN2(+) lesions is lower than that of physician-collected cervical specimen, and lowering the cutoff value can't improve its diagnostic performance. Using linear array as the HPV DNA test can significantly improve the screening diagnostic performance of self-collected specimens.

Adolescent ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; diagnosis ; virology ; Cervix Uteri ; virology ; DNA, Viral ; analysis ; Female ; Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Papillomaviridae ; isolation & purification ; Papillomavirus Infections ; diagnosis ; virology ; Self-Examination ; Specimen Handling ; methods ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; virology ; Vagina ; virology