The American Urological Association (AUA), European Association of Urology (EUA) and International Urological Society (SIU) annual meetings were held in 2022. Studies on prostate cancer reported in the meetings mainly focus on the advances of diagnostic biomarkers (such as α-2, 3-1inked sialylation of terminal N-glycan on free PSA density, SelectMDx) and imaging techniques [such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific membrane antigen(PSMA)-PET/CT], the new method for prostate biopsy, the new treatments of prostate cancer including [¹⁷⁷Lu] Ludotadipep and DROP-IN PSMA probe, and the prognosis assessment of prostate cancer (such as AR-V7). This article provides an overview on the research hotspots of three international academic meetings.
Male ; Humans ; Urology ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology* ; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Gallium Radioisotopes

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology* ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology* ; Urethra/injuries* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Retention/epidemiology* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urology

In this study, we sought to describe a novel imaging apparatus that is lightweight, inexpensive, and highly eff ective for use in colorectal diagnostic and treatment settings. Typical probes for use in colorectal ultrasonic imaging applications are developed for surgeons to diagnose and stage rectal tumors and image the rectum and anus. Here we outline a new technique and use it for colorectal imaging in an animal. This technique involves use of an ultrasound array module positioned along the axis of rotation such that improved rotation is possible. This module is in the shape of a linear rod with a rotary linear component that allows for emission of focused ultrasonic echo signals from a linear section of the probe. The usability of the transducer and rectal image quality are satisfactory in a porcine model with the technique proposed here, axial/lateral resolution as 0.96/2.24 mm with 6 dB applied through the contour map using the point spread function. When compared to currently available methods, this technique provides superior diagnostic 3D volumetric image quality with reduced acquisition time. Given this, the ultrasound device proposed here may prove a viable and preferable method to those currently available for urology and colorectal imaging applications.
Anal Canal ; Animals ; Methods ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Rectum ; Surgeons ; Transducers ; Ultrasonics ; Ultrasonography ; Urology

PURPOSE: To compare the current management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by urologists and nonurologists by use of Korean nationwide health insurance data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained patient data from the national health insurance system. New patients diagnosed with BPH in 2009 were divided into two groups depending on whether they were diagnosed by a urologist (U group) or by a nonurologist (NU group). RESULTS: A total of 390,767 individuals were newly diagnosed with BPH in 2009. Of these, 240,907 patients (61.7%) were in the U group and 149,860 patients (38.3%) were in the NU group. The rate of all initial evaluation tests, except serum creatinine, was significantly lower in the NU group. The initial prescription rate was higher in the U group, whereas the prescription period was longer in the NU group. Regarding the initial drugs prescribed, the use of alpha-blockers was common in both groups. However, the U group was prescribed combination therapy of an alpha-blocker and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor as the second choice, whereas the NU group received monotherapy with a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor. During the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of surgery was significantly different between the U group and the NU group. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct differences in the diagnosis and treatment of BPH by urologists and nonurologists in Korea. These differences may have adverse consequences for BPH patients. Urological societies should take a leadership role in the management of BPH and play an educational role for nonurologists as well as urologists.
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Databases, Factual ; *Disease Management ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Linear Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physicians ; Prostatic Hyperplasia/*diagnosis/*therapy ; Republic of Korea ; Urology/*methods ; Young Adult

No abstract available.
Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Periodicals as Topic ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Urolithiasis/diagnosis/therapy ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Urology/trends

No abstract available.
Animals ; Erectile Dysfunction/therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Stem Cell Transplantation/*methods ; Urologic Diseases/*therapy ; Urology/methods/trends

OBJECTIVETo explore the impact of the 2005 International Association of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason score (GS) system on prostatic carcinoma grading.

METHODSUsing the 1977 revision and ISUP version of GS system, 112 needle biopsies, 18 transurethral resections of the prostate and 55 radical prostatectomies were scored. The proportion of grading discrepancy was observed and compared between the two versions of GS.

RESULTSGleason scores of 3+3, 3+4 and 4+3 accounted for 47.0% (87/185), 11.4% (21/185) and 17.3% (32/185) in the modified system, and accounted for 25.9% (48/185), 21.6% (40/185) and 27.6 % (51/185) in ISUP system, respectively. The percentages of primary grade by modified vs. ISUP system were 62.7% (116/185) vs.50.8% (94/185) for grade 3, and 31.4% (58/185) vs. 41.6% (77/185) for grade 4. The percentages of secondary grade by modified vs. ISUP system were 65.9% (122/185) vs. 54.6% (101/185) for grade 3, and 21.1% (39/185) vs. 31.4% (58/185) for grade 4.

CONCLUSIONSISUP system is different from the modified system. Compared with the modified system, the proportion scored by ISUP system tends to decline for GS 3+3 but increase for GS 3+4 and 4+3.

Biopsy, Needle ; Carcinoma ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Grading ; methods ; Prostate ; pathology ; surgery ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Societies, Medical ; Urology

Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; trends ; Urology ; methods

Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Urology ; methods

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the face and content validation of the virtual reality transurethral resection of the prostate simulator (TURPSim(TM)).

METHODSThe 60 urology doctor aged 26 - 50 years old all over the country were enrolled for virtual reality training of TURP from September 2010 to June 2011. Participants classified as experts (more than 50 procedures performed) and novices (50 or fewer procedures performed) performed TURPs on TURPSim(TM) involving resection of 25 - 80 g prostate. They completed questionnaires regarding utility for residency training, realism and overall score of the TURPSim(TM). Performances of two groups were evaluated after 2-day training.

RESULTSwere recorded and analyzed.

RESULTSMean utility for residency training, realism and overall score were (8.8 ± 1.1) and (8.5 ± 1.4), (8.0 ± 1.2) and (8.4 ± 1.1), (8.7 ± 0.9) and (8.6 ± 0.8) in experts and novices respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). Spearman's correlation coefficients analysis showed an significant positive correlation between utility for residency training and realism (r = 0.625, P = 0.000), utility for residency training and overall score (r = 0.691, P = 0.000) in experts, utility for residency training and realism (r = 0.702, P = 0.000), utility for residency training and overall score (r = 0.664, P = 0.001) in novices. Prostate resection rate (87.3% ± 7.7%), bleeding control rate (94.4% ± 6.6%) and safety (95.2% ± 5.5%) in novices increased after training (t = -3.689, -2.274, -2.507, all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSThe face and content validation of transurethral resection of the prostate simulator is good, virtual reality training of TURP may improve the skills necessary to perform TURP. Transurethral resection of the prostate simulator can be used to train urology residents.

Adult ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; education ; methods ; Urology ; education ; methods