Objectives: In alignment with the World Health Organization’s goal of eliminating hepatitis C, this study assessed the current treatment status and reasons for non-treatment among patients with hepatitis C in Jeonbuk State, Republic of Korea, to inform strategies for improving care engagement. Methods: Among 311 individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C and reported through the NationalNotifiable Infectious Disease Surveillance system between January 2023 and June 2024, 208 patients were surveyed after excluding those who had died or could not be contacted.Statistical analyses included the chi-square test, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 116 participants (55.8%) reported having received antiviral therapy. Among the 92 untreated individuals, the most common reason for non-treatment was the absence of symptoms (n = 23; 25.0%), followed by the burden of drug costs (n = 21; 22.8%). Conclusion These findings highlight suboptimal treatment uptake and key barriers that may hinder progress toward hepatitis C elimination. Expanding screening and strengthening linkage-to-care strategies, while addressing financial barriers, will be essential to achievingnational elimination targets.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the Trauma-nursing Education and Skill Support (TESS) program based on the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation model). The program was designed to enhance trauma nurses’ clinical competencies, including trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, through the integration of theoretical education and simulation-based practice. Methods: A quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design was conducted. Participants included 108 trauma nurses from regional trauma centers, military trauma centers, and emergency care facilities, who were assigned to an experimental group (n=52) or a control group (n=56). The TESS program consisted of a 2-day, 14-hour blended-learning course that included eight lecture sessions and four simulation-based practice stations. Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6 months using validated instruments measuring trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for data analysis. Results: The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability compared with baseline (all p<.001). These improvements were sustained at 6 months, although trauma-related knowledge scores showed a slight decline compared with immediate posttest levels. Between-group analyses confirmed significant group-by-time interaction effects for all outcomes: trauma-related knowledge (η2=0.12, p<.001), self-efficacy (η2=0.09, p=.002), and problem-solving ability (η2=0.08, p=.003). Conclusion The TESS program effectively enhanced trauma nurses’ trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, with effects sustained for up to 6 months. Incorporating blended learning and simulation-based training into standardized trauma nursing education may strengthen clinical competencies and ultimately contribute to improved patient outcomes.

Background: There are limited long-term clinical outcome data comparing first-generation (1G) versus second-generation (2G) drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with single-vessel disease (SVD). We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 1G- and 2G-DES in SVD patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over 10 years of clinical follow-up. Methods: A total of 2,312 consecutive patients with SVD who underwent PCI with 1G-DES (paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents, n = 811) or 2G-DES (zotarolimus [Endeavor, Endeavor Resolute]- or everolimus-eluting stents [Promus Element, Xience], n = 1,082) were enrolled.After propensity score matching, 2 matched groups (538 pairs) were generated. Study endpoints included individual and composite clinical outcomes through 10 years. Results: During the 10-year follow-up, the 2G-DES group had lower incidences of myocardial infarction (MI; hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.92; P = 0.028) and target lesion revascularization (TLR; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.91; P = 0.021) than the 1G-DES group. Rates of total death, cardiac death, non-target vessel revascularization, stroke, major adverse cardiac events, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar between groups. Conclusions In our single-center, all-comer registry, 2G-DES were associated with lower incidence rates of MI and TLR compared to 1G-DES in SVD patients over 10 years of followup, indicating a safer and more durable effect than 1G-DES.

Purpose: Patients undergoing breast surgery may experience chronic postoperative pain in the breasts, upper extremities, and axillary regions, and no established methods for preventing this pain are available at present. This study aimed to investigate whether coaptation of the transected intercostal nerve can prevent the development of neuropathic and chronic breast pain after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted by dividing patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy into a control group without nerve coaptation and an experimental group with nerve coaptation.Patient clinical information was collected, and a survey using the pain and quality of life scale was conducted at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Fifteen patients completed the study, including seven in the control group and eight in the experimental group. The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of clinical factors. The experimental group exhibited lower Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores than the control group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference at 6 months. Numerical Rating Scale and Present Pain Intensity scores for both groups were in the “no to mild” range throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Although the difference in the BREAST-Q™ results did not reach statistical significance, the experimental group showed an improvement in the quality of life. Conclusion Intercostal nerve coaptation after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction may facilitate initial nerve recovery. Although trial results are needed to fully determine the clinical impact, our findings support the ongoing scientific and clinical efforts to use this technique.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Purpose: Patients undergoing breast surgery may experience chronic postoperative pain in the breasts, upper extremities, and axillary regions, and no established methods for preventing this pain are available at present. This study aimed to investigate whether coaptation of the transected intercostal nerve can prevent the development of neuropathic and chronic breast pain after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted by dividing patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy into a control group without nerve coaptation and an experimental group with nerve coaptation.Patient clinical information was collected, and a survey using the pain and quality of life scale was conducted at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Fifteen patients completed the study, including seven in the control group and eight in the experimental group. The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of clinical factors. The experimental group exhibited lower Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores than the control group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference at 6 months. Numerical Rating Scale and Present Pain Intensity scores for both groups were in the “no to mild” range throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Although the difference in the BREAST-Q™ results did not reach statistical significance, the experimental group showed an improvement in the quality of life. Conclusion Intercostal nerve coaptation after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction may facilitate initial nerve recovery. Although trial results are needed to fully determine the clinical impact, our findings support the ongoing scientific and clinical efforts to use this technique.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Purpose: Patients undergoing breast surgery may experience chronic postoperative pain in the breasts, upper extremities, and axillary regions, and no established methods for preventing this pain are available at present. This study aimed to investigate whether coaptation of the transected intercostal nerve can prevent the development of neuropathic and chronic breast pain after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted by dividing patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy into a control group without nerve coaptation and an experimental group with nerve coaptation.Patient clinical information was collected, and a survey using the pain and quality of life scale was conducted at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Fifteen patients completed the study, including seven in the control group and eight in the experimental group. The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of clinical factors. The experimental group exhibited lower Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores than the control group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference at 6 months. Numerical Rating Scale and Present Pain Intensity scores for both groups were in the “no to mild” range throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Although the difference in the BREAST-Q™ results did not reach statistical significance, the experimental group showed an improvement in the quality of life. Conclusion Intercostal nerve coaptation after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction may facilitate initial nerve recovery. Although trial results are needed to fully determine the clinical impact, our findings support the ongoing scientific and clinical efforts to use this technique.