1.Efficacy of a short-penis therapeutic apparatus on penile dysplasia in children and prediction of the penile dysplasia index.
Wan-Ting PU ; Yi-Na MA ; Turdi NAFISA ; Kai-Fang LIU ; Jia LI
National Journal of Andrology 2025;31(1):34-38
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the therapeutic effect of the short-penis treatment apparatus and wide-band infrared therapy apparatus on penile dysplasia (PDP) in children and establish objective parameters for assessing the severity of PDP.
METHODS:
This study included 252 children received in the Department of pediatric urology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January to December 2023, 102 with PDP (the PDP group) and the other 150 with normal penile development (the control group), those of the former group treated with the short-penis therapeutic apparatus and wide-band infrared therapy apparatus. Before and after 30 days of treatment, we measured the flaccid penile length (FPL), stretched penile length (SPL) and penile diameters (PD) of the children, and defined the penile dysplasia index as the FPL/SPL and FPL/PD ratios.
RESULTS:
The penile parameters exhibited statistically significant differences between the PDP and control groups, (FPL:[1.97±0.72]cm vs [3.25±0.51] cm, P<0.01; SPL:[3.80±0.81]cm vs [5.21±0.79]cm,P<0.01).The FPL remarkably increased in the PDP group after treatment([1.97±0.72]cm vs [2.90±1.20] cm, P<0.01). Both FPL and SPL were notably shorter in the PDP cases than in the controls, with the cutoff values of 0.57 and 2.09, sensitivities of 80.7% and 95.3%, and specificities of 69.6% and 82.4% for FPL/SPL and FPL/PD, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The short-penis therapeutic apparatus and wide-band infrared therapy apparatus can promote the growth and development of the penis in children. The ratio of FPL/PD can serve as an objective indicator to effectively describe the severity of penile developmental abnormalities.
Humans
;
Male
;
Penis/abnormalities*
;
Child
;
Penile Diseases/therapy*
;
Child, Preschool
;
Infant
2.Physical intervention combined with medical nutritional weight loss for the treatment of short penis in obese children.
Yi-Na MA ; Wan-Ting PU ; Turdi NAFISA ; Kai-Fang LIU ; Jia LI
National Journal of Andrology 2025;31(4):300-305
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the clinical effect of physical intervention combined with medical nutritional weight loss (PI+MNWL) in the treatment of short penis in obese children.
METHODS:
One hundred and twenty obese children with a short penis were included and equally divided into three groups: PI+MNWL, MNWL, and self-guided diet, who underwent PI+MNWL, MNWL intervention under the supervision of professional nutritionists in the hospital, or self-guided diet intervention at home, respectively, all for 30 days. We measured the penile parameters, including stretched penile length (SPL), flaccid penile length (FPL) and penile diameter (PD), of the children before and after treatment, and compared them among the three groups.
RESULTS:
After intervention, the body weight of the children was significantly decreased in all the three groups (27.1-94.1[53.59±11.88] kg vs 23.0-85.1[49.01±11.61] kg, P < 0.05). The weight of children in 3 groups decreased to different degrees, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). MNWL was found remarkably more effective than self-guided weight loss in reducing the body weight of the children (P < 0.05). Based on weight loss achieved through medical nutrition combined with physical intervention, the FPL in the PI+MNWL group increased from (1.93 ± 0.76) cm before treatment to (3.41 ± 1.41) cm after one course of comprehensive treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Similarly, SPL increased from (3.75 ± 0.76) cm before treatment to (4.98 ± 0.64) cm, and PD increased from (1.32 ± 0.21) cm before treatment to (1.61 ± 0.66) cm, both showing statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In the MNWL group , FPL increased from (2.01 ± 0.81) cm to (2.77 ± 0.84) cm after one course of treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Additionally, SPL increased from (4.03 ± 0.84) cm before treatment to (4.40 ± 0.76) cm, also demonstrating statistical significance (P < 0.05), while PD increased from (1.37 ± 0.21) cm before treatment to (1.42 ± 0.22) cm, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). FPL and SPL increased significantly in the PI+MNWL group compared to the MNWL group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in PD between the two groups following the intervention (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
MNWL is more effective than self-guided diet in controlling the body weight of children, while the combination approach of PI+MNWL is even superior to the management of short penis in obese children, with the advantages of improving the appearance and increasing the exposed length of the penis.
Humans
;
Male
;
Child
;
Weight Loss
;
Penis/abnormalities*
;
Obesity/complications*
;
Adolescent
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail