Background: and Purpose Whether perfusion-diffusion mismatch modifies treatment effect of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large strokes is poorly known. To address this question, we conducted a post hoc secondary analysis of the Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation (LASTE) randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: The LASTE RCT compared MT plus best medical treatment (BMT) to BMT alone in patients with large infarct (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 0–5) in the 0–7-hour timewindow. This secondary analysis was restricted to patients with available baseline MR perfusionweighted imaging. We investigated the potential heterogeneity of MT treatment according to the presence of perfusion-diffusion mismatch, defined as a mismatch ratio ≥1.2, calculated as the time-to-maximum >6 seconds cerebral volume divided by ischemic core volume. The primary outcome was better functional outcome (favorable shift in the distribution of modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 90 days, analyzed using generalized odds ratio [GenOR]). Results: A total of 102/324 patients were included, among whom 55 (54%) had a perfusiondiffusion mismatch. No significant treatment effect heterogeneity by diffusion-perfusion mismatch was observed for the primary outcome (GenOR for better functional outcome: 1.70 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.95 to 3.05] and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.87] in patients with and without mismatch, respectively; ratio of GenORs: 1.63 [95% CI, 0.71 to 3.74]; P for heterogeneity=0.24) or for the secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. Conclusions Our study found no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect with respect to benefit or safety in patients with unrestricted infarct size at baseline treated with MT by presence of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. An individual participant-data meta-analysis of RCT is needed for definitive conclusions.

Background: and Purpose The optimal management of patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) for acute BAO through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with acute BAO. We analyzed the pooled effect of EVT compared to MM on the primary outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] of 0–3 at 3 months), secondary outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3 months), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month mortality rates. For each study, effect sizes were computed as odds ratios (ORs) with random effects and Mantel-Haenszel weighting. Results: Four RCTs met inclusion criteria including 988 patients. There were higher odds of mRS of 0-3 at 90 days in the EVT versus MM group (45.1% vs. 29.1%, OR 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–3.80; P=0.04). Patients receiving EVT had a higher sICH compared to MM (5.4% vs. 0.8%, OR 7.89, 95% CI 4.10–15.19; P<0.01). Mortality was lower in the EVT group (35.5% vs. 45.1%, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42–0.99; P=0.05). In an analysis of two trials with BAO patients and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) <10, there was no difference in 90-day outcomes between EVT versus MM. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, EVT was associated with favorable outcome and decreased mortality in patients with BAO up to 24 hours from stroke symptoms compared to MM. The treatment effect in BAO patients with NIHSS <10 was less certain. Further studies are of interest to evaluate the efficacy of EVT in basilar occlusion patients with milder symptoms.