1.Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Jing ZHOU ; Zhu-Feng PENG ; Pan SONG ; Lu-Chen YANG ; Zheng-Huan LIU ; Shuai-Ke SHI ; Lin-Chun WANG ; Jun-Hao CHEN ; Liang-Ren LIU ; Qiang DONG
Asian Journal of Andrology 2023;25(3):356-360
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) measures have not been systematically applied in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study was performed on patients with BPH who required surgical intervention. From July 2019 to June 2020, the ERAS program was applied to 248 patients, and the conventional program was applied to 238 patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the differences between the ERAS group and the conventional group were evaluated. The ERAS group had a shorter time of urinary catheterization compared with the conventional group (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.0 ± 0.4 days vs 2.7 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.01), and the pain (mean ± s.d.) was significantly reduced through postoperative hospitalization days (PODs) 0-2 (POD 0: 1.7 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.01; POD 1: 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.3, P < 0.01; POD 2: 1.2 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding (P = 0.79), urinary retention (P = 0.40), fever (P = 0.55), and readmission (P = 0.71). The hospitalization cost of the ERAS group was similar to that of the conventional group (mean ± s.d.: 16 927.8 ± 5808.1 Chinese Yuan [CNY] vs 17 044.1 ± 5830.7 CNY, P =0.85). The International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) scores in the two groups were also similar when compared at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. The ERAS program we conducted was safe, repeatable, and efficient. In conclusion, patients undergoing the ERAS program experienced less postoperative stress than those undergoing the conventional program.
Male
;
Humans
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications*
;
Quality of Life
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
2.Transurethral resection of the prostate is an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Kun JIN ; Shi QIU ; Xin-Yang LIAO ; Xiao-Nan ZHENG ; Xiang TU ; Lian-Sha TANG ; Lu YANG ; Qiang WEI
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020;22(2):217-221
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is important for measuring the oncological outcomes of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Whether transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has negative postoperative effects on oncological outcomes remains controversial. The primary aim of our retrospective study was to determine whether a history of TURP could affect the postoperative BCR rate. We retrospectively reviewed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who had undergone RP between January 2009 and October 2017. Clinical data on age, prostate volume, serum prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA), biopsy Gleason score (GS), metastasis stage (TNM), D'Amico classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were collected. Statistical analyses including Cox proportional hazard models and sensitivity analyses which included propensity score matching, were performed, and the inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted estimator and standardized mortality ratio-weighted estimator were determined. We included 1083 patients, of which 118 had a history of TURP. Before matching, the non-TURP group differed from the TURP group with respect to GS (P= 0.047), prostate volume (mean: 45.19 vs 36.00 ml, P < 0.001), and PSA level (mean: 29.41 vs 15.11 ng ml-1, P= 0.001). After adjusting for age, PSA level, T stage, N stage, M stage, and GS, the TURP group showed higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.94, P= 0.004). After matching (ratio 1:4), patients who underwent TURP were still more likely to develop BCR according to the adjusted propensity score (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.05-3.79, P= 0.034). Among patients with PCa, those with a history of TURP were more likely to develop BCR after RP.
Aged
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology*
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood*
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects*
3.Transurethral resection of the prostate stricture management.
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020;22(2):140-144
For more than nine decades, transurethral resection of the prostate remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction. The occurrence of urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate is one of the major late complications and has been reported as the leading cause of iatrogenic urethral strictures in patients older than 45 years who underwent urethroplasty. Although several postulations have been proposed to explain the urethral stricture after transurethral resection of the prostate, the exact etiology of urethral stricture after TURP is still controversial. Suggested etiological factors of urethral stricture formation after transurethral resection of the prostate include infection, mechanical trauma, prolonged indwelling catheter time, use of local anesthesia, and electrical injury by a stray current. One single treatment option is not appropriate for all stricture types. The management of urethral stricture following transurethral resection of the prostate includes minimally invasive endoscopic methods, including urethral dilation and direct visual incision, or open surgical procedures with varying urethroplasty techniques. Although scientific studies focusing on urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate are relatively limited and sparse, we can apply the principles of urethral stricture management before making decisions on individual stricture treatment.
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prostate/surgery*
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery*
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects*
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Urethral Stricture/etiology*
4.Strategies of preserving urinary continence in transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia.
Jun-Yi CHEN ; Dong CHEN ; Jia-Liang WANG ; Xin MU ; Yi-Hong GUO ; Jian-Yu ZHANG ; Yi-Ning LI
National Journal of Andrology 2018;24(2):138-141
Objective:
To explore the strategies of preserving urinary continence in transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS:
We treated 65 BPH patients by PKEP with preservation of urinary continence (UC-PKEP), which involved protection of the external urethral sphincter in the beginning of surgery, proper preservation of the anterior lobe of the prostate to protect the internal urethral sphincter in the middle, and preservation of the integrity of the bladder neck towards the end. We compared the postoperative status of urinary continence of the patients with that of the 54 BPH cases treated by complete plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (Com-PKEP).
RESULTS:
All the operations were performed successfully with the urinary catheters removed at 5 days after surgery. In comparison with Com-PKEP, UC-PKEP achieved evidently lower incidence rates of urinary incontinence at 24 hours (31.49% vs 13.85%, P <0.05), 1 week (18.52% vs 4.62%, P <0.05), 2 weeks (14.81% vs 3.08%, P <0.05), 1 month (3.70% vs 1.54%, P >0.05), and 3 months (3.70% vs 0%, P >0.05) after catheter removal. Compared with the baseline, the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was significantly improved postoperatively in both the Com-PKEP ([7.43 ± 3.26] vs [20.58 ± 3.22] ml, P <0.05) and the UC-PKEP group ([8.04 ± 2.28] vs [20.66 ± 3.08] ml, P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Transurethral PKEP is a safe and effective method for the management of BPH, during which the strategies of avoiding blunt or sharp damage to the external urethral sphincter in the beginning, properly preserving the anterior lobe of the prostate in the middle and preserving the integrity of the bladder neck towards the end may help to achieve rapid recovery of urinary continence.
Humans
;
Male
;
Organ Sparing Treatments
;
methods
;
Postoperative Period
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethra
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Incontinence
;
prevention & control
5.Shovel-shaped electrode transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Lin ZHAO ; Yong-Hong MA ; Qi CHEN ; Yan-Bo CHEN ; Meng GU ; Jing-Feng GAO ; Guang-Tao ZHANG ; Jiang-Ning MOU ; Zhen-Hu BAO ; Zhong WANG
National Journal of Andrology 2018;24(2):133-137
Objective:
To compare the safety and effectiveness of shovel-shaped electrode transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) with those of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 78 BPH patients received in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from June 2016 to January 2017, 39 treated by shovel-shaped electrode PKEP and the other 39 by PKRP. We observed the patients for 6 months postoperatively and compared the effects and safety of the two surgical strategies.
RESULTS:
No statistically significant difference was observed between the PKEP and PKRP groups in the operation time ([69.3 ± 8.8] vs [72.2 ± 7.9] min, P = 0.126), but the former, as compared with the latter, showed a markedly less postoperative loss of hemoglobin ([3.9 ± 2.8] vs [13.9 ± 5.2] g/L, P <0.001) and shorter bladder irrigation time ([12.5 ± 1.2] vs [43.4 ± 2.8] h, P <0.001), catheterization time ([64.0 ± 4.5] vs [84.8 ± 3.0] h, P <0.001) and hospital stay ([3.1 ± 0.3] vs [5.5 ± 0.4] d, P <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the PKEP and PKRP groups in the postoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ([21.62 ± 1.07] vs [21.03 ± 0.96] ml/s, P = 0.12), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (5.85 ± 0.90 vs 6.03 ± 0.81, P = 0.279), quality of life score (QoL) (2.0 ± 0.73 vs 2.28 ± 0.72, P = 0.09), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) ([19.59 ± 6.01] vs [20.21 ± 5.16] ml, P = 0.629), or the incidence rates of urinary incontinence (2.56% [1/39] vs 7.69% [3/39], P >0.05) and other postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Both PKEP and PKRP are effective methods for the treatment of BPH, but PKEP is worthier of clinical recommendation for a better safety profile, more thorough removal of the prostate tissue, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and better improved quality of life of the patient.
China
;
Electrodes
;
adverse effects
;
Equipment Design
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
instrumentation
;
methods
;
Treatment Outcome
6.Transurethral diode laser enucleation versus transurethral electrovaporization resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with different prostate volumes.
Duo LIU ; Li FAN ; Cheng LIU ; Xue-Jun LIU ; Dong-Sheng ZHU ; Jia-Gui MU ; Dong-Wei YAO ; Qun SONG
National Journal of Andrology 2017;23(3):217-222
Objective:
To compare the clinical effect of diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DIOD) with that of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with different prostate volumes.
METHODS:
This retrospective study included 256 BPH patients treated by DIOD (n = 141) or TURP (n = 115) from March 2012 to August 2015. According to the prostate volume, we divided the patients into three groups: <60 ml (42 for DIOD and 31 for TURP), 60-80 ml (51 for DIOD and 45 for TURP), and >80 ml (48 for DIOD and 39 for TURP). We obtained the relevant data from the patients before, during and at 6 months after surgery, and compared the two surgical strategies in operation time, perioperative levels of hemoglobin and sodium ion, post-operative urethral catheterization time and bladder irrigation time, pre- and post-operative serum PSA levels, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), post-void residual urine (PVR) volume and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and incidence of post-operative complications among different groups.
RESULTS:
In the <60 ml group, there were no remarkable differences in the peri- and post-operative parameters between the two surgical strategies. In the 60-80 ml group, DIOD exhibited a significant superiority over TURP in the perioperative levels of hemoglobin ([3.25 ± 1.53] g/L vs [4.77 ± 1.67] g/L, P <0.05) and Na+ ([3.58 ± 1.27]mmol/L vs [9.67 ± 2.67] mmol/L, P <0.01), bladder irrigation time ([30.06 ± 6.22]h vs [58.32 ± 10.25] h, P <0.01), and urethral catheterization time ([47.61 ± 13.55] h vs [68.01 ± 9.69] h, P <0.01), but a more significant decline than the latter in the postoperative PSA level ([2.34 ± 1.29] ng/ml vs [1.09 ± 0.72] ng/ml, P <0.05), and similar decline was also seen in the >80 ml group ([3.35 ± 1.39] ng/ml vs [1.76 ± 0.91] ng/ml, P <0.05). No blood transfusion was necessitated and nor postoperative transurethral resection syndrome or urethral stricture observed in DIOD. However, the incidence rate of postoperative pseudo-urinary incontinence was significantly higher in the DIOD (22.7%, 32/141) than in the TURP group (7.83%, 9/115) (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
DIOD, with its obvious advantages of less blood loss, higher safety, faster recovery, and more definite short-term effectiveness, is better than TURP in the treatment of BPH with medium or large prostate volume and similar to the latter with small prostate volume.
Humans
;
Lasers, Semiconductor
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Operative Time
;
Organ Size
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
Prostate
;
pathology
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Therapeutic Irrigation
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
statistics & numerical data
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethral Stricture
;
etiology
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Incontinence
;
etiology
7.Thulium laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate and risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
Wen SONG ; Tao WANG ; Qing LING ; Xia-Ming LIU ; Zhong CHEN ; Xiao-Dong SONG ; Xiao-Lin GUO ; Qian-Yuan ZHUANG ; Shao-Gang WANG ; Ji-Hong LIU
National Journal of Andrology 2017;23(12):1085-1088
Objective:
To compare thulium laser vaporization of the prostate (TLVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) analyze the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
METHODS:
From June 2015 to June 2016, 210 BPH patients in our hospital underwent TURP (n = 126) or TLVP (n = 84). We followed up the patients for 6 months, compared the effects of the two surgical strategies and analyzed the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS:
Compared with TURP, TLVP achieved significantly shorter time of operation ([78.6 ± 27.5] vs [53.2 ± 21.6] min, P <0.01), postoperative bladder irrigation ([31.5 ± 2.9] vs [26.1 ± 3.7] h, P <0.01), urethral catheterization ([5.3 ± 1.7] vs [3.7 ± 1.5] d, P <0.01) and postoperative hospitalization ([7.9 ± 2.1] vs [5.5 ± 1.4] d, P <0.01) as well as lower urinary leukocyte count at 6 months after surgery ([32.1 ± 12.6] vs [24.9 ± 11.7] /μl, P <0.01) and incidence rate of postoperative complications (11.9% [15/126] vs 3.6% [3/84], P <0.05), particularly that of urethral stricture (7.9% [10/126] vs 1.2% [1/84], P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative urinary leukocyte count, postoperative urethral catheterization time, and surgical method were independent risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
CONCLUSIONS
TLVP, in comparison with TURP, has the advantages of definite effect, fast recovery, high safety and low incidence of postoperative urethral stricture. The main risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture include preoperative urinary tract infection, postoperative urethral catheterization time and surgical method.
Humans
;
Laser Therapy
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Male
;
Operative Time
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Regression Analysis
;
Risk Factors
;
Thulium
;
therapeutic use
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethral Stricture
;
etiology
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Tract Infections
;
complications
8.Prostatic urethral lift: A novel minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
National Journal of Andrology 2016;22(8):735-740
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and BPH-induced lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common factors influencing the quality of life (QOL) of elderly males. In case of undesirable or adverse effects of medication, many BPH patients seek surgical treatment. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), though evidently effective for BPH, fails to preserve the sexual function and therefore reduces the QOL of the patients. Moreover, some elderly patients with comorbidities may be unfit for TURP. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a newly developed surgical procedure for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH. With the advantages of minimal invasiveness, low rate of peri- and post-operative complications, and maximal preservation of patients' erectile and ejaculatory functions, PUL is winning more and more attention from the clinicians and patients.
Aged
;
Ejaculation
;
Humans
;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
;
etiology
;
surgery
;
Male
;
Penile Erection
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethra
;
surgery
9.Effects of Dexmedetomidine Infusion on the Recovery Profiles of Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection.
So Young KWON ; Jin Deok JOO ; Ga Young CHEON ; Hyun Seok OH ; Jang Hyeok IN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2016;31(1):125-130
Transurethral resection has been the gold standard in the operative management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder tumor; however, it is associated with several complications that may cause patient discomfort. We evaluated the usefulness of continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation, hemodynamic status, and recovery profiles in patients undergoing elective surgery by a randomized clinical trial. Sixty patients aged 30 to 80 yr who were scheduled for elective transurethral resection under general anesthesia were included in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups (control group, group C; dexmedetomidine group, group D). A total of 60 male patients were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to group C (n=30) or group D (n=30). The quality of emergence in group D was marked by a significantly lower incidence of emergence agitation than in group C (P=0.015). Patients in group D therefore felt less discomfort induced by the indwelling Foley catheter than those in group C (P=0.022). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to side effects including bradycardia (P=0.085), hypotension (P=0.640), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.389). Our study showed that intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion effectively reduced the incidence and intensity of emergence agitation and catheter-induced bladder discomfort without delaying recovery time and discharge time, thus providing smooth emergence during the recovery period in patients undergoing transurethral resection (Clinical Trial Registry No. KT0001683).
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Blood Pressure
;
Bradycardia/etiology
;
Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Hemodynamics
;
Humans
;
Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Hypotension/etiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Nausea/etiology
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia/*surgery
;
Psychomotor Agitation/*drug therapy
;
*Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
Vomiting/etiology
10.Effect and safety of GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization of the prostate for different benign prostatic hyperplasia populations.
Kun FANG ; Bo YANG ; Rui QU ; Qiang DONG
National Journal of Andrology 2015;21(7):619-625
OBJECTIVETo evaluated the safety and effect of the 120-W GreenLight HPS laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in different BPH populations.
METHODSThis study included 174 BPH patients treated by PVP using 120-W Green-Light HPS laser. According to the prostate volume (PV) ( < 80 or ≥ 80 ml), history of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) medication, and history of acute urinary retention (AUR), we divided the patients into a PV < 80 ml, a PV ≥ 80 ml, a 5-ARI, a no 5-ARI; an AUR, and a no AUR group. We collected the baseline, perioperative, and follow-up data about the patients, and compared them among different groups.
RESULTSThe patients were aged 69.4 ± 7.7 years, of whom PVP was successfully performed for 136 and PVP was intraoperatively converted to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the other 38, with a mean operation time of (49.4 ± 16.3) min. The preoperative PV averaged (67.9 ± 29.8) ml. There was no intraoperative blood transfusion, transurethral resection syndrome, or capsule perforation. Bladder neck contracture occurred in 2 cases and urethral stricture developed in another 2 postoperatively. All the patients showed a significant improvement in the prostatic function parameters and no significant differences were observed between the PV < 80 ml and PV ≥ 80 ml, 5-ARI and no 5-ARI, or AUR and no AUR groups.
CONCLUSIONPVP with 120-W GreenLight HPS laser is safe and efficient for the treatment of BPH and the its effect is not influenced by the prostate volume, history of 5-ARI medication, or history of AUR. However, preoperative urinary catheterization may increase the difficulty of surgery and the risk of conversion to TURP.
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Operative Time ; Organ Size ; Prostate ; pathology ; surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; pathology ; surgery ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethral Stricture ; etiology ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Retention

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail