Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Chi-BEAM regimen (chidamide combined with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma.Methods:This retrospective case series included 78 patients with newly treated high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma who underwent ASCT with the Chi-BEAM conditioning regimen in the Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), from June 2021 to May 2024. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate clinical characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.Results:The median age of the 78 evaluable patients was 47 years (range 16-68), with 8 patients (10.3%) aged ≥60 years. At the first post-transplant assessment (3 months), the objective response rate was 94.9% (74/78). The median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 2.9-44.9). The median PFS time was 20.1 months (range 1.6-45.1), with a 2-year cumulative PFS rate of 81.8%. The median OS time was 20.6 months (range 3.1-45.1), with a cumulative 2-year OS rate of 93.2%. The regimen was well-tolerated; mild-to-moderate hypocalcemia within 1 week post-infusion and transient mild erythrocyturia on the infusion day were the primary adverse reactions.Conclusion:The Chi-BEAM regimen combined with ASCT demonstrates both safety and clinical benefit in patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Chi-BEAM regimen (chidamide combined with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma.Methods:This retrospective case series included 78 patients with newly treated high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma who underwent ASCT with the Chi-BEAM conditioning regimen in the Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), from June 2021 to May 2024. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate clinical characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.Results:The median age of the 78 evaluable patients was 47 years (range 16-68), with 8 patients (10.3%) aged ≥60 years. At the first post-transplant assessment (3 months), the objective response rate was 94.9% (74/78). The median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 2.9-44.9). The median PFS time was 20.1 months (range 1.6-45.1), with a 2-year cumulative PFS rate of 81.8%. The median OS time was 20.6 months (range 3.1-45.1), with a cumulative 2-year OS rate of 93.2%. The regimen was well-tolerated; mild-to-moderate hypocalcemia within 1 week post-infusion and transient mild erythrocyturia on the infusion day were the primary adverse reactions.Conclusion:The Chi-BEAM regimen combined with ASCT demonstrates both safety and clinical benefit in patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Objective:To assess the efficacy, safety, and related prognostic factors associated with the P-GemDOx regimen as a first-line treatment for patients with early-stage extranodal natural killer (NK) /T cell lymphoma (ENKTL) .Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on sixty early-stage ENKTL patients treated with the P-GemDOx regimen who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between August 2015 and May 2021. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare group differences, and the Log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors were examined.Results:After completing 4 to 6 cycles of P-GemDOx chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 88.3%, with forty-six patients (76.7% ) achieving complete response (CR). The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were (66.3±7.1) % and (79.5±6.0) %, respectively. According to the PINK/PINK-E model, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes among risk groups. 23.3% of patients experienced progression of disease within 24 months (POD<24). OS estimates differed significantly ( P<0.001) between the POD<24 group ( n=14) and the POD≥24 group ( n=46). Analysis showed that SUVmax > 12.8 at diagnosis, non-single nasal cavity infiltration, and response less than CR after 4–6 cycles all had a significant association with POD24. We used these data as the basis for predicting POD<24 international prognostic index (POD24-IPI). Patients were stratified into low-risk (no risk factors), intermediate-risk (one risk factor), or high risk (two or three risk factors). These groups were associated with 4-year OS rate of 100%, (85.6±9.7) %, and (65.0±10.2) %, respectively ( P=0.014). The P-GemDOx regimen was well tolerated, with hematological toxicity being the main side effect. Conclusion:This study demonstrated that the P-GemDOx regimen is effective and safe in the first-line treatment of early-stage ENKTL, and POD24-IPI is a promising prognostic model.

Background::Although the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) has undergone advancements during the past several years, the response rate and long-term effects with respect to patients with PTCL remain unsatisfactory—particularly for relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. This phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of an all-oral regimen of chidamide plus prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and thalidomide (CPCT) for R/R PTCL patients who could not tolerate the standard chemotherapy for a variety of reasons.Methods::We conducted a multicenter phase II clinical trial in which we combined chidamide (30 mg twice weekly) with prednisone (20 mg daily after breakfast), cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily after lunch), and thalidomide (100 mg daily at bedtime) (the CPCT regimen) for a total of fewer than 12 cycles as an induction-combined treatment period, and then applied chidamide as single-drug maintenance. Forty-five patients were ultimately enrolled from August 2016 to April 2021 with respect to Chinese patients at nine centers. Our primary objective was to assess the overall response rate (ORR) after the treatment with CPCT.Results::Of the 45 enrolled patients, the optimal ORR and complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) were 71.1% (32/45) and 28.9% (13/45), respectively, and after a median follow-up period of 56 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively. The five-year PFS and OS rates were 21.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-34.5%) and 43.8% (95% CI, 28.3-59.3%), respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (20/45, 44.4%), but we observed no treatment-related death.Conclusion::The all-oral CPCT regimen was an effective and safe regimen for R/R PTCL patients who could not tolerate standard chemotherapy for various reasons.Trial Registration::ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02879526.

Objective To explore the experiences of family caregivers in dealing with the care-resistance behaviors in elderly patients with dementia,to improve the quality of care for elderly patients with dementia,and to enhance the ability of family caregivers to cope with resistance behaviors.Methods Utilizing purposeful sampling,we conducted in-depth interviews with 16 family caregivers of elderly patients with dementia between February 2024 and May 2024.The participants were recruited from a tertiary-grade hospital and the surrounding community in Zhengzhou,Henan Province.The interview data were subjected to thematic analysis using the Colaizzi 7-step method.Results A total of 19 interviews were conducted in this study,with each caregiver being interviewed for 30-44 minutes.The total transcription was about 82,000 words,and 4 themes and 11 sub-themes were identified:the considerable physical and psychological burden(persistent negative emotions,gradually increasing physical burden),realization of self-worth(sense of filial responsibility,care benefit feeling),subjective adjustment of coping strategies(actively seeking external support,resorting to restrictions and protection,passively coping out of helplessness),and facing multiple coping challenges(difficulty in establishing effective communication,poor sleep quality,lack of caregiving skills,unmet diverse support needs).Conclusion Family caregivers experience a heavier burden of care and develop various negative emotions when dealing with resistance behaviors.Different caregivers gradually adapt and develop different coping strategies in the care process.However,there are still some coping dilemmas that need to be resolved.Healthcare professionals should pay timely attention to caregivers'experiences in dealing with resistance behaviors,correct their attitudes towards care-resistance behaviors,strengthen health education on managing care-resistance behaviors,and improve their ability to cope with care-resistance behaviors.

Objective To explore the experiences of family caregivers in dealing with the care-resistance behaviors in elderly patients with dementia,to improve the quality of care for elderly patients with dementia,and to enhance the ability of family caregivers to cope with resistance behaviors.Methods Utilizing purposeful sampling,we conducted in-depth interviews with 16 family caregivers of elderly patients with dementia between February 2024 and May 2024.The participants were recruited from a tertiary-grade hospital and the surrounding community in Zhengzhou,Henan Province.The interview data were subjected to thematic analysis using the Colaizzi 7-step method.Results A total of 19 interviews were conducted in this study,with each caregiver being interviewed for 30-44 minutes.The total transcription was about 82,000 words,and 4 themes and 11 sub-themes were identified:the considerable physical and psychological burden(persistent negative emotions,gradually increasing physical burden),realization of self-worth(sense of filial responsibility,care benefit feeling),subjective adjustment of coping strategies(actively seeking external support,resorting to restrictions and protection,passively coping out of helplessness),and facing multiple coping challenges(difficulty in establishing effective communication,poor sleep quality,lack of caregiving skills,unmet diverse support needs).Conclusion Family caregivers experience a heavier burden of care and develop various negative emotions when dealing with resistance behaviors.Different caregivers gradually adapt and develop different coping strategies in the care process.However,there are still some coping dilemmas that need to be resolved.Healthcare professionals should pay timely attention to caregivers'experiences in dealing with resistance behaviors,correct their attitudes towards care-resistance behaviors,strengthen health education on managing care-resistance behaviors,and improve their ability to cope with care-resistance behaviors.