PURPOSE: Flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) enable minimally invasive and immediate fracture stabilisation, while facilitating early active movement in metacarpal fractures. This systematic review aims to compare locked, non-locked, single, and double FIN and their post-operative outcomes in metacarpal fractures. METHODS: A primary literature search was performed on July 15, 2024. English-language studies investigating acute metacarpal fractures, treated with FIN were included. Analyses included: the 5th metacarpal neck fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN; 5th metacarpal neck fractures non-locked single vs. dual FIN; and the 2nd-5th metacarpal fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN. The National Institute for Health tool and the JBI tool were used to assess study quality for controlled trials and case series, respectively. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (n=649 fractures) were eligible, with 12 low risks of bias. There was no difference in overall complication rates between locked and non-locked, and single and double non-locked FIN. Non-locked FIN demonstrated reduced metacarpophalangeal joint penetration (odds ratio (OR): 3.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-8.80; p=0.017 and delayed union (OR: 6.95; 95% CI: 1.86-25.97; p=0.004), but increased tendon irritation (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.83; p=0.027 vs. locked FIN. Overall operative times were lower for single vs. double non-locked nails (mean difference: 9.17; 95% CI: 6.12-12.22; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate low complication rates and excellent functional results using FIN to fix displaced metacarpal fractures. Although complication profiles are contrasting, there is no clear benefit in using locked or double nails compared to a single non-locked FIN.
Humans ; Metacarpal Bones/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods* ; Fractures, Bone/surgery* ; Bone Nails

PURPOSE: Alcohol has been associated with 10%-35% trauma admissions and 40% trauma-related deaths globally. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Kingdom entered a state of "lockdown" on March 23, 2020. Restrictions were most significantly eased on June 1, 2020, when shops and schools re-opened. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of lockdown on alcohol-related trauma admissions. METHODS: All adult patients admitted as "trauma calls" to a London major trauma centre during April 2018 and April 2019 (pre-lockdown, n = 316), and 1st April-31st May 2020 (lockdown, n = 191) had electronic patient records analysed retrospectively. Patients' blood alcohol level and records of intoxication were used to identify alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions from pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts were compared using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Alcohol-related trauma was present in a significantly higher proportion of adult trauma calls during lockdown (lockdown 60/191 (31.4%), vs. pre-lockdown 62/316 (19.6%); (odds ratio (OR): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.38-1.28, p < 0.001). Lockdown was also associated with increased weekend admissions of trauma (lockdown 125/191 weekend (65.5%) vs. pre-lockdown 179/316 (56.7%); OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.79 to -0.02, p = 0.041). No significant difference existed in the age, gender, or mechanism between pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The United Kingdom lockdown was independently associated with an increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions were increased during the weekend when staffing levels are reduced. With the possibility of further global "waves" of COVID-19, the long-term repercussions of dangerous alcohol-related behaviour to public health must be addressed.
Adult ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Cohort Studies ; Communicable Disease Control ; Humans ; London/epidemiology* ; Pandemics ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Centers