Objective:This retrospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, in the management of relapse/refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R cHL) .Methods:A total of 35 patients with R/R cHL who received treatment at the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College from September 2016 to December 2020 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 17 patients received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PD-1 inhibitor group), while 18 patients received a combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy (PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group). Clinical data and follow-up information were retrospectively analyzed, and survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.Results:The median age of the 35 patients with R/R cHL was 29 years (range: 11-61 years), with 54.3% being male. According to the Ann Arbor staging system, 62.9% of patients presented with advanced (stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ) disease, and 48.6% had extranodal involvement. Before PD-1 inhibitor therapy, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-3). Objective responses were observed in 28 patients, including 22 complete response (CR) cases, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 80.0% and a CR rate of 62.9%. Specifically, the ORR and CR rates were 64.7% and 58.8%, respectively, in the PD-1 inhibitor group and 94.4% and 66.7%, respectively, in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group. Among the 18 patients who underwent sequential autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) [13 CR and five partial response (PR) cases], eight patients received PD-1 inhibitor therapy after auto-HSCT as consolidation therapy. All patients maintained a CR status after transplantation, and they exhibited significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates compared with those who did not undergo sequential auto-HSCT (4-year PFS rates: 100% vs 53.5% ; P=0.041). The incidence of immune-related adverse events was 29%, with only one patient experiencing grade≥3 adverse reactions, which indicated a favorable safety profile for the treatment approach. Conclusions:PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy demonstrates notable efficacy and sustained response in patients with R/R cHL. PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improve response rates. Additionally, for salvage therapy-sensitive patients, consolidation treatment with PD-1 inhibitors after auto-HSCT exhibits the potential for prolonging PFS.

The lymphatic system of the heart plays an important role in the repair process after myocardial injury and may regulate normal tissue homeostasis and natural regeneration via maintaining fluid homeostasis and controlling the inflammatory response. The lymphatic system in the heart is activated after myocardial injury and is involved in the scarring process of the heart. Recent studies on the lymphatic system and myocardial repair of the heart have developed rapidly, and the mechanisms for lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic endothelial cell secretion have been elucidated by different animal models. A deep understanding of the structural, molecular, and functional characteristics of the lymphatic system of the heart can help develop therapies that target the lymphatic system in the heart. Summarizing the progress in studies on targets related to myocardial repair and the cardiac lymphatic system is helpful to provide potential new targets and strategies for myocardial repair therapy after myocardial infarction.
Animals ; Heart ; Myocardium ; Myocardial Infarction ; Heart Injuries ; Lymphatic System

Adaptation, Psychological ; Adolescent ; COVID-19 ; Child ; China ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; SARS-CoV-2

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide combined with rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) .Methods:The clinical data of 43 enrolled patients from May 2004 to December 2017 were analyzed the efficacy and survival results.Results:A total of 43 patients with 31 males and 12 females, and the median age was 58 years old (range 36 to72) before treatment. There were 8 patients with symptom B. The median number of peripheral blood lymphocyte was 26 (3-550) ×10 9/L. IGHV unmutated was detected in 62.1% (18/29) patients, P53 deletion in 14% (6/43) patients, RB1 deletion in 18.6% (8/43) patients, Trisomy 12 in 25.6% (11/33) patients, ATM deletion in 16.7% (7/42) patients, respectively. The median number of treatment courses administered was 4 (range 2-6) . Twenty patients obtained CR (46.5%) , 18 patients obtained PR, 4 patients were SD, 1 patient was PD. The overall response rate (ORR) was 88.37%. Seven patients obtained MRD negative. After the median follow-up time of 51 (6-167) months, median PFS was 67 (29-105) months, median OS was not reach, 5-year PFS was (62.1±8.6) %, 10-year PFS was (31±14.3) %, 5-year OS was (70.5±8.3) %, and 10-year OS was (51.3±13.8) %. Less than 4 courses predicted adverse OS ( P<0.05) . P53 deletion and less than 4 courses were associated with poor PFS ( P<0.001) , and the prognostic value still remained after multivariate analysis[ HR=7.65 (95% CI 1.74-33.60) , P=0.007; HR=3.75 (95% CI 1.19-11.80) , P=0.025]. Eighteen patients (41.9%) appeared grade 2-3 infection after chemotherapy, and 19 patients (44.2%) appeared grade 3-4 hematological adverse reactions. One patient (2.3%) was developed tumor lysis syndrome. All adverse reactions were controlled or recovered spontaneously. Conclusion:Previously untreated CLL patients treated with FCR had a high response rate and good survival rate, which is an important treatment choice for fit patients.

Objective: To investigate the curative effect of hairy cell leukemia by clatabine. Methods: The clinical data of 24 patients with hairy cell leukemia treated by cladribine from November 2006 to October 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, then the curative effect and adverse drug reaction were analyzed. Results: ① A total of 24 patients including 22 male and 2 female, and the median age was 49.5 years (range 33 to 76) at diagnosis. There were 20 patients with of splenomegaly (4 patients with mild splenomegaly, 4 moderate splenomegaly, and 12 massive splenomegaly), 3 patients with enlargement of lymph nodes, and 1 patients who had undergone splenectomy. Five patients were pancytopenia, 15 were cytopenia in 2 lineages, and 4 patients were cytopenia only in one lineage. The median ratio of HCL cells detected by flow cytometry in bone marrow was 21.79% (0.69%-68.96%). BRAF mutation was detected in 15 patients by first generation or next generation sequencing technology. ② Among 24 patients, 20 were treated with cladribine alone (one course in 19 patients, 2 courses in 1 patient), and 4 patients were treated with cladribine combined with rituximab (one course in 3 patients, 2 courses in 1 patient). Excepting 5 patients whose follow-up time was not reaching 6 months, 19 patients were evaluated for efficacy in 6-12 months after treatment: 9 patients obtained CR, 9 obtained unconfirmed CR (Cru), the other 1 obtained PR, the CR/CRu rate was 94.7%, the overall response rate (ORR) was 100.0%. ③ All the 24 patients appeared 2-4 grade hematological adverse reactions after cladribine treatment, which were mainly grade 3/4 neutropenia (66.67%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (29.2%). All the adverse reactions were controlled or recovered spontaneously. ④ After the median follow-up time of 15 (3-133) months, no progression, recurrence or death occurred in the patients. Both median OS and PFS were not reached. Conclusion This study suggests that treatment of HCL with cladribine has high response rate, controllable adverse reactions and the good prognosis.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and prognostic value of the minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients of China. Methods: Clinical data of 106 consecutively newly diagnosed MM patients with MRD data were retrospectively analyzed in a single center in China from June 2013 to June 2015. Results: ① Of 106 patients, 48 (45.3%) achieved MRD negativity. The median time to MRD-negative was 3 months. More patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) achieved MRD negativity compared with non-ASCT patients (62.2% vs 36.2%, χ²=6.536, P=0.011). ② Of 48 patients in complete remission (CR), 7 (14.6%) was MRD positive, 5 of them showed disease progression (PD) during the follow-up, and 3 died. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 19 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 28 months, both were significantly shorter than the CR patients with MRD-negative (P<0.05). ③At a median follow-up of 38 months, MRD-negative patients showed significantly superior outcomes compared with MRD positive ones, the PFS was not reach versus 17 months and the OS was not reach for both (P<0.001). Patients were grouped into 4 categories according to their MRD levels: 1% or higher, 0.1% to less than 1%, 0.01% to less than 0.1%, or negative. It showed that the outcomes (PFS and OS) tended to be improved along with the tumor depletion. ④ Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that MRD was a powerful independent prognostic factor for PFS[HR=0.133 (95% CI 0.062-0.288) , P<0.001] and OS[HR=0.156 (95% CI 0.050-0.484) , P=0.001]. According to MRD and cytogenetics, the patients were classified into 4 groups. High risk patients with MRD negative presented a significantly better outcome than high risk patients with MRD-positive, and a similar one to the standard risk patients with MRD-negative. Conclusions MRD negativity by MFC was more popular in MM patients undergoing ASCT. MRD was an independent prognostic factor in MM. And the prognosis of MM patients can be stratified according to the level of MRD. MRD-negative patients with high risk cytogenetics presented a similar outcome to the standard risk ones. MRD by MFC should therefore be considered more widely applied in the clinic.

Objective To investigate the correct diagnosis and treatment of myeloid and lymophoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and the FIP1L1-PDGFR fusion gene. Methods A case of patient who was diagnosed as myeloid and lymophoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and the FIP1L1-PDGFR fusion gene was reported, and the literature was reviewed. Results The patient was diagnosed as typical T-lymphoblast lymphoma (T-LBL) by the lymph node pathologic diagnosis, while the diagnosis of myeloid and lymophoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and the FIP1L1-PDGFR fusion gene was made correctly by the whole examination and analysis. The patient acquired deep complete remission quickly after taking the low dose of imatinib. Conclusions Myeloid and lymophoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and the FIP1L1-PDGFR fusion gene are a rare hematologic tumor. Though pathological diagnosis is the golden standard for lymphoma, sometimes the other factors should be taken into consideration and make an overall analysis of clinical picture and a correct view of the pathological diagnosis, which could avoid the misdiagnosis and improper treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome of a combined protocol for multiple myeloma (MM) , including induction therapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and consolidation and maintenance therapy. Methods: Clinical records of 144 patients with MM from January 1, 2005 to February 1, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) after ASCT was 100.0%, in which the complete remission (CR) was 64.1% and the best treatment response rate of superior to PR was 89.4%. During a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with an overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was 120.9 and 56.9 months respectively. 5y-OS (73.7±4.7) %, 7y-OS (60.5±6.3) %; 3y-PFS (69.2±4.2) %, 5y-PFS (47.8±5.3) %. The median OS and PFS between the first line transplantation group and salvage transplantation group were 120.9 months vs 50.1 months and 60.2 months vs 16.7 months (all P=0.000). In 127 patients with R-ISS staging, the median survival of Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ stage was 120.9 months (n=43) , 88.4 months (n=64) , 35.6 months (n=20) , respectively (P=0.000). For subgroup analysis of survival in early and late ASCT, the median OS of patients with R-ISS stage Ⅲ (35.6 months vs 15.8 months, P=0.031) and the median PFS of two groups (phase Ⅰ: 72.1 months vs 18.9 months, P=0.000; Ⅱ: 53.4 months vs 16.7 months, P=0.012; Ⅲ: 28.5 months vs 5.9 months, P=0.001) were different. Multivariate analysis showed that only R-ISS and the degree of remission before transplantation had impact on OS (HR=8.486, 95% CI 2.549-28.255, P=0.003) and PFS (HR=2.412, 95% CI 1.364-4.266, P=0.002) , respectively. Conclusion The combined protocol containing ASCT is effective for MM patients, improving remission rate and remission depth, prolonging PFS and OS. First line transplantation could significantly prolong the OS and PFS as compared with salvage transplantation. R-ISS and pre-transplantation remission depth are prognostic factors for survival.

For further maximizing the minimally invasive benefits for colorectal cancer patients, laparoscopic surgeons have been dedicating to improve the surgery through single-port (SILES) or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), which is supported by amount of single-port devices and flexible laparoscopic instruments.Many small sample studies of single institution have suggested that SILES for colorectal cancer has similar oncological outcomes with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), could improve the cosmetic results, and is more minimally invasive than CLS. However, evidences of advantages for SILES are limited, because of there has been only 4 published studies of prospective randomized clinical trial so far. Due to the technical difficulties and long learning curves, SILES and NOTES are relatively hard to be widely promoted. Thus, a balance between minimally invasive pursuit and laparoscopic technical challenge should be sought. In this way, modified SILES and reduced-port laparoscopic surgery have emerged in recent years, which might be minimally invasive solutions with lower technical demanding for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries. Adding a port as the surgeon′s dominant operation channel improved the collisions or overlapping of instruments with movement to reduce the technical difficulties. SILS+ 1 is safe and feasible, would be supported by more and more evidences.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term and oncologic outcomes of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+ 1) for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer. Methods: The clinic data of 46 patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer underwent SILS+ 1 at Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University from September 2013 to September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed (SILS+ 1 group). After generating 1∶1 ration propensity scores given the covariates of age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgeons, tumor location, the distance of tumor from anal, tumor diameter, and pathologic TNM stage, 46 patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the same time were matched as CLS group. The baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared using t test, χ² test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-rank tests demonstrated the distribution of disease free survival. Results: The two study groups were well balanced with respect to the baseline characteristics of the propensity score derivation model. As compared to the CLS group, patients in SILS+ 1 group had a smaller incision ((6.9±1.1) cm vs. (8.4±1.2) cm, t=6.502, P=0.000), less estimated blood loss (20(11) ml vs. 50(30) ml, Z=2.414, P=0.016), shorter intracorporeal operating time ((67.0±25.8) minutes vs. (75.5±27.7) minutes, t=2.062, P=0.042) and significantly faster recovery course including shorter time to first ambulation ((46.7±20.3) hours vs. (78.6±28.0) hours, t=6.255, P=0.000), shorter time to first oral diet ((64.7±28.8) hours vs. (77.1±30.0) hours, t=2.026, P=0.047), shorter time of postoperative hospital stay ((7.8±2.2) days vs. (6.5±2.2) days, t=2.680, P=0.009), and lower postoperative visual analogue scale scores (F=4.721, P=0.032). No significant difference was observed in total operating time, postoperative morbidity, first time to flatus and defecation, analgesic use, number of retrieved lymph nodes and resection margin. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (ranging from 7 to 39 months) , there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 3-year disease-free survival (SILS+ 1: 91.3%, CLS: 93.4%, P=1.000). The recurrence rates of SILS+ 1 group and CLS groups were 8.7% (4/46) and 6.5% (3/46), respectively. Conclusion For experienced CLS surgeons, the SILS+ 1 for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer would be easiness, safe and efficient alternative.