The application of function-preserving pancreatic surgery as a restrictive resection technique is primarily targeted towards benign or those with borderline or low-grade lesions. This approach has been shown to significantly improve both short-term and long-term quality of life outcomes for patients following surgical intervention. In comparison to conventional laparoscopic procedures, robotic surgical systems have demonstrated superior efficacy and precision when employed in pancreas surgeries, and the safety and reliability are widely recognized within the medical community. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of research investigating the specific appli-cations of robotic-assisted function-preserving pancreatic surgery. Consequently, the authors compre-hensive review the latest progress on robot-assisted function-preserving pancreatic surgery, while highlighting of surgical scope, techniques utilized during these procedures as well as associated prognostic considerations.

Due to advances in surgical techniques, perioperative care, and new immunosuppressive agents, intestinal transplantation has become a valid therapeutic choice for chronic intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation has been performed most commonly using deceased donation, while less than 2% of which have been from living donation. Living donor intestinal transplantation obtaining a segmental intestinal graft, usually from close relatives. Preliminary results show that acute/chronic rejection rates, postoperative opportunistic infections, and graft versus host disease are significantly reduced after living donor intestinal transplantation, contributing to improved graft and patient survivals. Due to a severe shortage of organ donation, especially in children, living donor intestinal transplantation has increasingly become an important treatment option for patients with chronic intestinal failure in China.

Compared with conventional treatments, oncolytic virotherapy has the advantages of enhanced cytotoxicity, improved targeting, and minimal side effects. However, its efficacy is not as good as expected for the single drug treatment. The purpose of synergistic effect is one of the development directions of existing oncolytic virus therapy. In this paper, through a systematic review of the current preclinical and clinical trials progress of oncolytic virus combination therapy, the combined treatment strategies of oncolytic virus and immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, targeted therapy,and cell therapy are reviewed to provide reference for further clinical application.

Due to advances in surgical techniques, perioperative care, and new immunosuppressive agents, intestinal transplantation has become a valid therapeutic choice for chronic intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation has been performed most commonly using deceased donation, while less than 2% of which have been from living donation. Living donor intestinal transplantation obtaining a segmental intestinal graft, usually from close relatives. Preliminary results show that acute/chronic rejection rates, postoperative opportunistic infections, and graft versus host disease are significantly reduced after living donor intestinal transplantation, contributing to improved graft and patient survivals. Due to a severe shortage of organ donation, especially in children, living donor intestinal transplantation has increasingly become an important treatment option for patients with chronic intestinal failure in China.

Compared with conventional treatments, oncolytic virotherapy has the advantages of enhanced cytotoxicity, improved targeting, and minimal side effects. However, its efficacy is not as good as expected for the single drug treatment. The purpose of synergistic effect is one of the development directions of existing oncolytic virus therapy. In this paper, through a systematic review of the current preclinical and clinical trials progress of oncolytic virus combination therapy, the combined treatment strategies of oncolytic virus and immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, targeted therapy,and cell therapy are reviewed to provide reference for further clinical application.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the malignant tumors of the digestive system with the highest morbidity and mortality. The vast majority of patients with intermdiate and advanced HCC have low response rates and poor long-term survival to a series of treatments mainly based on transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). In recent years, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy and their combination with TACE have developed rapidly. This article reviews the research progress of TACE combined with systemic drug therapy in HCC and looks forward to the future direction of precise treatment of HCC.

Tumor recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is a major challenge to patient survival. Postoperative adjuvant therapy has been proved to be an effective method in tackling tumor recurrence. However,its role in HCC remains unclear. First,there are many differences between Chinese and foreign guidelines in recommendations on adjuvant therapy of HCC. Chinese guidelines have made many recommendations on various modalities of adjuvant therapy of HCC,including anti-viral therapy,transarterial chemoembolization,and herbs. On the contrary,foreign guidelines don′t make any recommendation on adjuvant therapy of HCC,except for anti-viral therapy. Second,clear definition of patients who have a higher risk of tumor recurrence is still unknown. In other words,patients who will benefit from adjuvant therapy is unclear. Although various kinds of adjuvant therapies have been proved to be efficient in preventing tumor recurrence and prolonging patient survival,a standard protocol is still lacking. There are many ongoing clinical trials investigating the value of adjuvant therapy in HCC. Emerging evidences will answer questions on the role of adjuvant therapy and how to perform it.

Tumor recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is a major challenge to patient survival. Postoperative adjuvant therapy has been proved to be an effective method in tackling tumor recurrence. However,its role in HCC remains unclear. First,there are many differences between Chinese and foreign guidelines in recommendations on adjuvant therapy of HCC. Chinese guidelines have made many recommendations on various modalities of adjuvant therapy of HCC,including anti-viral therapy,transarterial chemoembolization,and herbs. On the contrary,foreign guidelines don′t make any recommendation on adjuvant therapy of HCC,except for anti-viral therapy. Second,clear definition of patients who have a higher risk of tumor recurrence is still unknown. In other words,patients who will benefit from adjuvant therapy is unclear. Although various kinds of adjuvant therapies have been proved to be efficient in preventing tumor recurrence and prolonging patient survival,a standard protocol is still lacking. There are many ongoing clinical trials investigating the value of adjuvant therapy in HCC. Emerging evidences will answer questions on the role of adjuvant therapy and how to perform it.

Neoadjuvant therapy has been proved beneficial in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer and it has received unprecedented attention in past years. However, the clinical value of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer patients remains controversial.Although the NCCN guideline has recommended that resectable pancreatic cancer patients with high-risk factors should be given preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, there is no consensus on specific criteria, treatment options, treatment duration and timing of surgery.More high-level evidences are strongly required.Recently, the development of new technologies such as liquid biopsy and radiomics analysis for pancreatic cancer will also help to address some clinical problems.This article reviewed the developments and controversies in neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer.

The low surgical resection rate and high postoperative recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) are urgent clinical problems to be solved. Therefore, it is important to develop effective perioperative treatment. In recent years, a growing number of studies have shown that systemic therapy is expected to break through the limitations of traditional local treatment and play an important role in preoperative treatment. For example, some novel targeted agents and immunocheckpoint inhibitors have shown excellent potential as neoadjuvant treatment for HCC. Meanwhile, researchers have explored the application of systemic therapy as adjuvant therapy, but due to different criteria for patient selection, no consensus is reached on its efficacy. By far, there is no standard procedure for the application of systemic therapy in HCC perioperative period, little is known about the efficacy and safety of targeted drugs and immunotherapy. This article discusses the feasibility of systemic therapy as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of HCC, as well as its adverse events, with an aim to provide new horizons of HCC systemic therapy in the perioperative period.