Infantile hemangioma (IH) usually presents solely as a cutaneous manifestation, and rarely accompanies diverse anomalies such as spinal dysraphism. A 2-month-old girl presented with IH on her lumbar skin as a coin-sized red plaque with adjacent depressed skin and a child-palm-sized red plaque on her left ankle since birth. Considering the coexistence of IH and depressed skin on the midline in her lumbosacral area, magnetic resonance imaging of her spine was performed, which showed intraspinal/dermal vascular tumors with spina bifida occulta at the 12th thoracic vertebrae level. Furthermore, no neurologic deficits were observed. She has been taking oral propranolol with topical timolol to prevent neural complications and the lesions clinically improved. However, additional surgery for the intraspinal lesions was considered due to urination/defecation abnormalities since she was 13 months of age. In cases of midline IH, particularly with additional skin lesions, appropriate imaging studies to identify accompanying anomalies should be performed, and referrals to neurosurgical specialists should be considered.
Ankle ; Female ; Hemangioma ; Humans ; Infant ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neurologic Manifestations ; Parturition ; Propranolol ; Referral and Consultation ; Skin ; Specialization ; Spina Bifida Occulta ; Spinal Dysraphism ; Spine ; Thoracic Vertebrae ; Timolol

PURPOSE: To compare the allergy prevalence and clinical manifestations of 0.2% brimonidine/0.5% timolol fixed combination (BTFC) and 0.15% brimonidine in Korean patients with glaucoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 196 glaucoma patients treated with BTFC and 234 glaucoma patients treated with 0.15% brimonidine. We compared sex, age, type of glaucoma, treatment period, allergy history, onset time of ocular allergy and clinical characteristics of allergy in the two groups. RESULTS: Ocular allergy percentages 10.14% in the BTFC group and 22.02% in the 0.15% brimonidine group, and the risk of allergy was approximately 0.4 times lower in patients using BTFC (hazard ratio = 2.5, p = 0.009). The BTFC group developed ocular allergy at a mean of 20.5 months (range: 1.7–51.1 months), and the 0.15% brimonidine group developed ocular allergy at a mean of 7.7 months (range: 0.4–50.8 months). In the BTFC group, 50% of the ocular allergy occurred within 15 months, and within 5 months in the 0.15% brimonidine group. Clinical characteristics of brimonidine allergy involved two types of conjunctival follicles and conjunctival papillae, but there were no significant differences in incidence according to allergy type (p = 0.566). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ocular allergy in the BTFC group was lower than that in the 0.15% brimonidine group in Korean patients with glaucoma. The results of this study are expected to be useful for patient education and compliance improvement using brimonidine.
Brimonidine Tartrate ; Compliance ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Incidence ; Medical Records ; Patient Education as Topic ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Timolol

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of a fixed combination of 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol (Tapcom®, Santen, Osaka, Japan) in glaucoma patients. METHODS: This study included 23 patients who were diagnosed with normal tension glaucoma and treated with a fixed combination of 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol as the first therapy. Diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured every 2 and 0.5 hours between 9:00 am and 4:30 pm. The IOP change with respect to body position (positional IOP) was measured at baseline and at 6 months after eye-drop instillations. IOP fluctuation was defined as the standard deviation of IOP measurements. Throughout the study, all side effects were recorded and monitored by the investigators. RESULTS: The mean reduction in IOP in the 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol fixed combination-treated eyes was −3.37 ± 2.39 mmHg (−19.70 ± 13.97%) for the right eye and −3.22 ± 2.27 mmHg (-18.81 ± 13.28%) for the left eye (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The mean positional IOP measured at 4 pm at 6 months after 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol fixed combination instillation showed statistically significant reduction from the mean positional IOP at baseline. There was a significant difference in the number of patients with ≤3 mmHg IOP variation over four time points between baseline and at 6 months in the 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol fixed combination-treated eyes (McNemar test, p < 0.001). There was no serious adverse event causing ocular damage. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 0.0015% tafluprost-0.5% timolol fixed combination was effective and well tolerated in reducing IOP and in maintaining its effectiveness in glaucoma patients.
Glaucoma ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Low Tension Glaucoma ; Research Personnel ; Timolol

PURPOSE: Superior oblique myokymia is intermittent spontaneous contractions of the superior oblique muscle presenting as rapid and small-amplitude intorsions and depressions of the eye. The authors report a case of superior oblique myokymia that was objectively and quantitatively diagnosed with slit lamp examination and video-oculography and completely resolved with medical treatment. CASE SUMMARY: A 44-year-old woman presented with a seven-year history of intermittent oscillopsia which continued for few seconds. She had no history of head trauma or systemic ocular disease, and the anterior segment and fundus examination were unremarkable. Right eye intorsion lasting for a few seconds as detected by slit lamp examination. Eye movements were recorded using video-oculography, which showed a torsional nystagmus of 5 to 10 degrees with 2 to 5 vertical components in the right eye. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with superior oblique myokymia. The patient was prescribed topical timolol ophthalmic solution, one drop twice per day, but the symptoms persisted. Timolol ophthalmic solution was stopped and replaced with carbamazepine, 200 mg twice a day, which resolved her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Slit lamp examination and video-oculography can be used as objective and quantitative diagnostic tools in order to confirmed a diagnosis and lead to proper treatment.
Adult ; Carbamazepine ; Craniocerebral Trauma ; Depression ; Diagnosis* ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Humans ; Slit Lamp ; Timolol ; Trochlear Nerve Diseases*

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the toxic effects of eyedrops containing a fixed combination of 2.0% dorzolamide and 0.5% maleate timolol with or without preservatives on rabbit corneal endothelium. METHODS: This study was performed with 22 eyes of New Zealand white rabbits. Dorzolamide/timolol eyedrops with preservative (Cosopt group) or without preservative (Cosopt-S group) were diluted with a balanced salt solution at a 1 : 1 ratio. We injected 0.1 mL of diluted Cosopt into the anterior chamber of left eyes and an equal volume of diluted Cosopt-S into the anterior chamber of right eyes. Corneal thickness, corneal haze, and conjunctival injection were measured before and 24 hours after treatment. Endothelial damage was compared between both eyes by vital staining (alizarin red/trypan blue staining), live/dead cell assay, TUNEL assay, and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Corneal endothelial damage was severe in the Cosopt group. Cosopt-treated eyes exhibited remarkable corneal edema and prominent apoptosis of endothelial cells. In addition, the live/dead cell assay revealed many dead cells in the endothelium, and scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that corneal endothelial cells exhibited a partial loss of microvilli on the surface as well as extensive destruction of intercellular junctions. However, in the Cosopt-S group, corneal edema was mild and the damage to the corneal endothelium was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of corneal endothelial toxicity was due to the preservative in the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination eyedrops, and not the active ingredient. Thus, it appears to be safer to use preservative-free eyedrops during the early postoperative period.
Animals ; Anterior Chamber/drug effects ; Apoptosis ; Corneal Edema/chemically induced/*pathology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Combinations ; Endothelium, Corneal/drug effects/*pathology ; In Situ Nick-End Labeling ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; Rabbits ; Sulfonamides/administration & dosage/*toxicity ; Thiophenes/administration & dosage/*toxicity ; Timolol/administration & dosage/*toxicity

OBJECTIVETo dicuss the clinical efficacy of Timolol Maleate Eye Drops in the treatment of superficial infantile hemangiomas. Methods From April 2012 to May 2014, 210 patients with superficial infantile hemangiomas were included. According to the parents' choice, a total of 176 cases were treated with Timolol Maleate Eye Drops as the treatment group, and the 34 cases who received the treatment of "wait and see" was included in the control group. In the treatment group, the gauzes were dipped into the eye drops and putted evenly on the surface of the hemangioma, 3-4 times daily and lasted for more than 20 minutes. The gauze should completely cover the surface of the tumor. The follow-up periods were 3 weeks and 6 months after treatment with the pictures to record the treatment effect. The therapeutic effect was graded as: grade I (unable to control the growth of the hemangioma), II (the growth of the hemangioma stagnated), III (hemangioma significantly subsided), IV (the hemangioma completely disappeared). The effective rate included the cases with grade II and above grade II . The cure cases included the cases with grade IV. The data was analyzed with the statistical software SPSS 17.0 and the Chi-square test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS3 cases in the treatment group showed eczema action. Tumor ulcer happened in 1 case in treatment group. The side effect rate was 2.3% . The results at 3 weeks following in the treatment group showed that the growth of the hemangioma were stagnated in 154 cases. The color of hemangioma became darker in different degrees than before, and the texture of the hemangioma became soft in majority of children, and the thickness of hemangioma became thinner in some cases. However, only 4 cases showed the hemangiomas were subsided, 18 cases showed the color of the part of the hemangiomas were brighter than before, and 12 cases of the hemangiomas remained original state in the control group. The results of 6 weeks following the treatment showed that 18 patients in the treatment group reached the standard of the grade IV, 84 patients reached the standard of the grade III, 60 patients achieved in the standard of grade II, and only 14 patients showed the volume of hemangiomas were increased as grade I. The effective rate was 58. 0% , and the cure rate was 10. 2% in treatment group. In control group, no children reached the standard of the grade IV, 4 cases reached the standard of grade III, 13 cases who remained original state reached the standard of grade II, and 17 cases showed the volume of hemangiomas continued to increase as grade I . The effective rate was 11. 8% , and the cure rate was 0. By comparison, the effective rate and the cure rate in the control group were relatively lower than those in the treatment group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSThe efficacy of Timolol Maleate Eye Drops in the treatment of superficial infantile hemangioma is exact, especially in the proliferative phase of the infantile hemangioma. It is safe and easy to perform with mild side effect. It should be selected as first-line treatment.

Administration, Topical ; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists ; administration & dosage ; Child ; Hemangioma ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; administration & dosage ; Skin Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Timolol ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Watchful Waiting

Infantile hemangioma is a common, benign tumor of infancy. Although systemic propranolol was found to be effective in the treatment of infantile hemangioma, its use is often challenging for clinicians owing to its potential side effects. Recent small studies have suggested that the topical use of timolol maleate gel, a non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist, might be effective for the treatment of superficial infantile hemangioma. Here, we report three cases of infantile hemangioma of different sizes and depths treated with the topical timolol maleate gel-forming solution.
Hemangioma ; Propranolol ; Timolol*

BACKGROUNDLowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only therapeutic approach in primary open-angle glaucoma. and the fixed-combination medications are needed to achieve sufficiently low target IOP. A multicenter prospective study in the Chinese population was needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Eye Drop in China. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination with concurrent administration of its components in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODSIn this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel controlled study, patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were insufficiently responsive to monotherapy with either topical β-blockers or prostaglandin analogues were randomized to one of two active treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio at 11 Chinese ophthalmic departments. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination treatment was a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (followed by vehicle for masking) once daily at 19:00 P.M. and concurrent treatment was 0.03% bimatoprost followed by 0.5% timolol once daily at 19:00 P.M. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 4 visit in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Primary analysis evaluated the non-inferiority of bimatoprost/ timolol fixed combination to concurrent with respect to the primary variable using a confidence interval (CI) approach. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination was to be considered non-inferior to concurrent if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the between-treatment (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) difference was ≤ 1.5 mmHg. Adverse events were collected and slit-lamp examinations were performed to assess safety. Between-group comparisons of the incidence of adverse events were performed using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTSOf the enrolled 235 patients, 121 patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination and, 114 patients were randomized to receive concurrent treatment. At baseline the mean value of mean diurnal IOP was (25.20 ± 3.06) mmHg in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and (24.87 ± 3.88) mmHg in the concurrent group. The difference between the treatment groups was not statistically significant. The mean change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP (± standard deviation) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group was (-9.38 ± 4.66) mmHg and it was (-8.93 ± 4.25) mmHg in the concurrent group (P < 0.01). The difference between the two treatment groups (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) in the change from baseline of mean diurnal IOP was -0.556 mmHg (95% CI: -1.68, 0.57, P = 0.330). The upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 1.5 mmHg, the predefined margin of non-inferiority. Adverse events occurred in 26.4% (32/121) of the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination patients and 30.7% (35/114) of the concurrent patients. The most frequent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was reported as treatment related in 16.5% (20/121) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and 18.4% (21/114) in the concurrent group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSBimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination administered in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was not inferior to concurrent dosing with the individual components. Safety profiles were similar between the treatment groups.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Amides ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Bimatoprost ; Cloprostenol ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ocular Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Timolol ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost and timolol in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary-care centre. One hundred and forty patients with newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma were randomly assigned to treatment with latanoprost (0.005%), bimatoprost (0.03%), travoprost (0.004%) or timolol gel (0.5%); 35 patients were assigned to each group. All patients were followed for 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The main outcome measure studied was the change in IOP at week 12 from the baseline values. Safety measures included recording of adverse events. RESULTS: The mean IOP reduction from baseline at week 12 was significantly more with bimatoprost (8.8 mmHg, 35.9%) than with latanoprost (7.3 mmHg, 29.9%), travoprost (7.6 mmHg, 30.8%) or timolol (6.7 mmHg, 26.6%) (ANOVA and Student's t-tests, p < 0.001). Among the prostaglandins studied, bimatoprost produced a maximum reduction in IOP (-2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.25 to -3.18) followed by travoprost (-1.27; 95% CI, -0.81 to -1.27) and latanoprost (-1.25; 95% CI, -0.79 to -1.71); these values were significant when compared to timolol at week 12 (Bonferroni test, p < 0.001). Latanoprost and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP at each patient visit. Ocular adverse-events were found in almost equal proportion in patients treated with bimatoprost (41.3%) and travoprost (41.9%), with a higher incidence of conjunctival hyperemia (24.1%) seen in the bimatoprost group. Timolol produced a significant drop in heart rate (p < 0.001) at week 12 when compared to the baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost showed greater efficacy when compared to the other prostaglandins, and timolol was the most efficacious at lowering the IOP. Conjunctional hyperemia was mainly seen with bimatoprost. However, the drug was tolerated well and found to be safe.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Bimatoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Female ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Timolol/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Travoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity/drug effects ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields/drug effects

PURPOSE: We conducted a study to evaluate the effects of brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 33 normal-tension glaucoma patients treated with BTFC in the unilateral eye. We measured intraocular pressure (IOP) every 2 and 1/2 hours between 09:00 am and 04:30 pm. After using BTFC at 8:00 am and 8:00 pm for 6 months, we measured the IOP at the same time period. We analyzed and compared the IOP of eyes treated with BTFC and contralateral eyes. RESULTS: The mean reduction in IOP was -2.85 +/- 1.43 mm Hg (-18.36 +/- 8.58%) in the eyes treated with BTFC and -2.21 +/- 1.73 mm Hg (-13.90 +/- 10.66%) in the contralateral eyes. The IOP lowering effect was greater in the eyes treated with BTFC than in the contralateral eyes. After 6 months of BTFC instillation, the changes in IOP measurements were the lowest at 11:30 am and increased at each time point afterwards. The greatest reduction in IOP was observed at 1 month; however, significant IOP reduction was observed at 3 and 6 months in both BTFC and contralateral eyes. There was no serious adverse event causing ocular damage. CONCLUSIONS: BTFC provided a significant IOP reduction in both BTFC and contralateral eyes in NTG patients.
Glaucoma* ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Timolol*