Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of physician modified stent grafts technique and in situ fenestration technique for reconstructing the left subclavian artery in endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions with insufficient proximal landing area.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 75 patients with aortic arch lesions treated with physician modified stent grafts and in situ fenestration techniques at the Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment Department of Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University from November 2021 to March 2024. Among them, 52 patients received within physician modified stent grafts (PMSGs group) and 23 patients received in situ fenestration (ISF group). Based on two fenestration techniques, to analyze the technical success rate of endovascular repair in reconstructing the left subclavian artery in the perioperative and early following up adverse events both groups.Results:The success rate of PMSGs group technique was 92.31% (48/52), while the success rate of ISF technique was 91.30%(21/23). In the PMSGs group, there was 1 case of TypeⅠa endoleak and 3 cases of TypeⅠc endoleak immediately during endovascular repair; There was 1 case of TypeⅠa endoleak and 1 case of vascular injury in the ISF group immediately during endovascular repair. One case of perioperative cerebral infarction and one case of transient blindness occurred in the PMSGs group; One case of transient blindness and 1 case of brachial artery thrombosis occurred in the perioperative period in the ISF group. During the follow-up period, there was 1 case of distal dissection aneurysm formation in the PMSGs group, and 3 cases of minor typeⅠc endoleak were found after 3 months; One case of subclavian artery stent occlusion and 2 cases of minor typeⅠc endoleak occurred in the ISF group 6 months later. There were no cases of aortic-related deaths during the follow-up period in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the technical success rate, incidence of adverse events during the perioperative period and follow-up period, and re-intervention rate between the two groups. The average fluoroscopy time consumed in the ISF group was significantly higher than that in the PMSGs group (34.57 min vs. 21.42 min, P<0.001), but the average hospitalization time in the PMSGs group was significantly higher than that in the ISF group (9.33 days vs. 4.71 days, P<0.001). Conclusion:PMSGs and ISF techniques for reconstructing the left subclavian artery in the treatment of thoracic aortic arch lesions showed good safety and effectiveness. The appropriate fenestration technique selected based on aorta arch anatomical and lesion conditions could achieve satisfactory efficacy in short-term, but long-term effects need to be further observed.

Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of diseases involving in the aortic arch.Methods:The clinical data of 52 patients with aortic arch diseases treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair technique at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from Nov 2021 to Jan 2024 was retrospectively analyzed.Results:Fenestration technique was used to reconstruct the branches of the arch for all 52 patients, with a success rate of 100%. A total of 56 stent grafts in the thoracic aorta and 56 bridging stents in the branch artery were implanted. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 24 months, with an average of 11.3 months. One patient with type B aortic dissection underwent secondary intervention treatment after six months due to the distal reentry tear, and none of the patients experienced branch vessel ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, renal dysfunction, or aortic disease-related deaths during the following-up period.Conclusion:Fenestrated technique in endovascular aortic repair is safe and effective for treating aortic arch diseases.

Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of physician modified stent grafts technique and in situ fenestration technique for reconstructing the left subclavian artery in endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions with insufficient proximal landing area.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 75 patients with aortic arch lesions treated with physician modified stent grafts and in situ fenestration techniques at the Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment Department of Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University from November 2021 to March 2024. Among them, 52 patients received within physician modified stent grafts (PMSGs group) and 23 patients received in situ fenestration (ISF group). Based on two fenestration techniques, to analyze the technical success rate of endovascular repair in reconstructing the left subclavian artery in the perioperative and early following up adverse events both groups.Results:The success rate of PMSGs group technique was 92.31% (48/52), while the success rate of ISF technique was 91.30%(21/23). In the PMSGs group, there was 1 case of TypeⅠa endoleak and 3 cases of TypeⅠc endoleak immediately during endovascular repair; There was 1 case of TypeⅠa endoleak and 1 case of vascular injury in the ISF group immediately during endovascular repair. One case of perioperative cerebral infarction and one case of transient blindness occurred in the PMSGs group; One case of transient blindness and 1 case of brachial artery thrombosis occurred in the perioperative period in the ISF group. During the follow-up period, there was 1 case of distal dissection aneurysm formation in the PMSGs group, and 3 cases of minor typeⅠc endoleak were found after 3 months; One case of subclavian artery stent occlusion and 2 cases of minor typeⅠc endoleak occurred in the ISF group 6 months later. There were no cases of aortic-related deaths during the follow-up period in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the technical success rate, incidence of adverse events during the perioperative period and follow-up period, and re-intervention rate between the two groups. The average fluoroscopy time consumed in the ISF group was significantly higher than that in the PMSGs group (34.57 min vs. 21.42 min, P<0.001), but the average hospitalization time in the PMSGs group was significantly higher than that in the ISF group (9.33 days vs. 4.71 days, P<0.001). Conclusion:PMSGs and ISF techniques for reconstructing the left subclavian artery in the treatment of thoracic aortic arch lesions showed good safety and effectiveness. The appropriate fenestration technique selected based on aorta arch anatomical and lesion conditions could achieve satisfactory efficacy in short-term, but long-term effects need to be further observed.

Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of diseases involving in the aortic arch.Methods:The clinical data of 52 patients with aortic arch diseases treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair technique at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from Nov 2021 to Jan 2024 was retrospectively analyzed.Results:Fenestration technique was used to reconstruct the branches of the arch for all 52 patients, with a success rate of 100%. A total of 56 stent grafts in the thoracic aorta and 56 bridging stents in the branch artery were implanted. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 24 months, with an average of 11.3 months. One patient with type B aortic dissection underwent secondary intervention treatment after six months due to the distal reentry tear, and none of the patients experienced branch vessel ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, renal dysfunction, or aortic disease-related deaths during the following-up period.Conclusion:Fenestrated technique in endovascular aortic repair is safe and effective for treating aortic arch diseases.

Objective To compare the radiation dose of in vitro pre-fenestration and in situ fenestration thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)in treatment of aortic disease.Methods Data of 51 patients with aortic diseases who received in vitro pre-fenestration(group A)and 21 cases who underwent in situ fenestration(group B)TEVAR were retrospectively analyzed.The fluoroscopy duration,total reference air kerma(AK),total dose area product(DAP)and TEVAR time were compared between groups.Results TEVAR was successfully completed in all 72 patients.Fluoroscopy duration([21.42±8.04]min vs.[34.57±9.07]min)and total DAP(44315.0[31157.0,56307.5]μGy·m2 vs.72153.0[45460.0,82354.0]μGy·m2)in group A were both significantly lower than those in group B(both P＜0.05),while total AK(2423[1638,3533]mGy vs.3600[1898,3921]mGy)and TEVAR time([83.41±22.89]min vs.[81.00±22.13]min)in group A were not significant different from those in group B(both P＞0.05).Conclusion Compared with in situ fenestration TEVAR,both the fluoroscopy time and total DAP of in vitro pre-fenestration TEVAR significantly reduced for treating aortic diseases.

Objective:To report a single-center experience with the Cordis Incraft endograft with low-profile in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with severe infrarenal neck.Methods:All patients underwent EVAR with Incraft stent grafts between September 2019 and September 2022, were prospectively enrolled, and retrospectively analyzed. Anatomical details of the proximal aortic neck were evaluated, divided into the severe infrarenal neck (SIN, 13 cases) and normal infrarenal neck (NIN, 50 cases) groups. Early endpoints were intraoperative unplanned cuff or coil embolism, technical success (TS), 30-day morbidity/mortality, and reinterventions. Follow-up endpoints were occurrence of endoleaks, endograft migration, branch stent/ iliac stent-graft stenosis or occlusion, reintervention. The postoperative endoleak, aneurysm sac shrinkage, patency of iliac stent-graft/branch stent, and freedom from reinterventions between the two groups were compared.Results:A total of sixty-three patients were enrolled in this trial, all of whom were successfully treated. There was no significant difference in patient and lesion characteristics, excluding aneurysm neck length, neck angle and maximum aneurysm sac diameter. Proximal aneurysm neck length was shorter in the SIN group [(9.9±8.3)mm vs. (29.6±12.3)mm, P<0.001] and the neck angle was more tortile in the SIN group [(39.1±30.4)°vs.(25.1±15.4)°, P=0.036], as well maximum sac diameter was larger in the SIN group [(57.5±13.4)mm vs. (45.5±12.4)mm, P=0.016]. Although the results showed no differences between the two groups regarding the oversize rate of the main body stent graft, endoleak in operative and perioperative period, as well the hospital stay, the operative time was significantly longer in the SIN group [(96.36±31.83)min vs. (63.58±26.68)min, P=0.001]. Over the 3 years of follow-up (median time, 18 months), there were significant differences between the two groups regarding the complication occurrence of endoleak, renal stent or iliac stent-graft stenosis/occlusion ( P=0.012), and reintervention ( P=0.044). Conclusion:Data from this trial demonstrated excellent early and mid-term outcomes of EVAR using Incraft stent grafts, including severe infrarenal neck, with acceptable safety and efficacy in the short and middle terms.

Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ARAHKEY(arterial closure using an additional hemostatic device that is deeply compatible with an extravascular suturing device) technique during percutaneous transluminal repair of thoracic aortic disease(TEVAR).Methods:From January 2021 to January 2023, a total of 202 patients underwent TEVAR in our center.24 patients were treated with ARAHKEY technology, which involves using an additional 7F Exosel at the femoral artery puncture site to achieve hemostatic effect when two ProGlide embedded sutures cannot achieve hemostatic effect.Results:All patients achieved complete hemostasis.The mean time for compression hemostasis was(5.8±2.6)min.In this study cohort, no complications including recurrent bleeding, infection, and late acquired hematoma were observed.Conclusion:ARAHKEY technology is a safe method that can be considered as the primary choice when using ProGlide during TEAVR without achieving hemostatic effects.

Various etiologies and risk factors contribute to foot pain in children and adolescents, including conditions such as Kohler's disease, Sever's disease, Iselin's disease, rigid flat foot, accessory navicular, Freiberg's disease, sesamoiditis, os trigonum syndrome, and more. High-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasonography can show both the bone surface and the surrounding soft tissue clearly from various angles in real-time, thereby providing a higher level of detail that is helpful for identifying the etiology of foot pain and monitoring disease progression compared with other imaging modalities. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and characteristic ultrasonographic findings of select foot pain conditions in children and adolescents.

Various etiologies and risk factors contribute to foot pain in children and adolescents, including conditions such as Kohler's disease, Sever's disease, Iselin's disease, rigid flat foot, accessory navicular, Freiberg's disease, sesamoiditis, os trigonum syndrome, and more. High-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasonography can show both the bone surface and the surrounding soft tissue clearly from various angles in real-time, thereby providing a higher level of detail that is helpful for identifying the etiology of foot pain and monitoring disease progression compared with other imaging modalities. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and characteristic ultrasonographic findings of select foot pain conditions in children and adolescents.

Various etiologies and risk factors contribute to foot pain in children and adolescents, including conditions such as Kohler's disease, Sever's disease, Iselin's disease, rigid flat foot, accessory navicular, Freiberg's disease, sesamoiditis, os trigonum syndrome, and more. High-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasonography can show both the bone surface and the surrounding soft tissue clearly from various angles in real-time, thereby providing a higher level of detail that is helpful for identifying the etiology of foot pain and monitoring disease progression compared with other imaging modalities. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and characteristic ultrasonographic findings of select foot pain conditions in children and adolescents.