Allergen-specific immunotherapy（AIT） remains the only therapeutic approach with the potential to modify the natural course of allergic rhinitis（AR）. Nevertheless, considerable inter-individual variability exists in patients'responses to AIT. To facilitate more reliable assessment of treatment efficacy, the China Rhinopathy Research Cooperation Group（CRRCG） convened young and middle-aged nasal experts in China to formulate the present consensus. The recommended subjective outcome measures for AIT comprise symptom scores, medication scores, combined symptom and medication scores, quality-of-life assessments, evaluation of disease control, and assessment of comorbidities. Objective indicators may supplement these measures. Currently available objective approaches include skin prick testing, nasal provocation testing, and allergen exposure chambers. However, these methods remain constrained by practical limitations and are not yet appropriate for routine implementation in clinical efficacy evaluation. In addition, several biomarkers, including sIgE and the sIgE/tIgE ratio, sIgG4, serum IgE-blocking activity, IgA, cytokines and chemokines, as well as immune cell surface molecules and their functional activity, have been shown to have associations with AIT outcomes. While these biomarkers may complement subjective assessments, they are subject to significant limitations. Consequently, large-scale multicenter trials and real-world evidence are required to strengthen the evidence base. The present consensus underscores the necessity of integrating patients'subjective experiences with objective testing throughout the treatment process, thereby providing a more comprehensive and accurate framework for efficacy evaluation. Looking forward, future investigations should prioritize the incorporation of multi-omics data and artificial intelligence methodologies, which hold promise for overcoming current limitations in assessment strategies and for advancing both the standardization and personalization of AIT.
Humans ; Allergens/immunology* ; China ; Consensus ; Desensitization, Immunologic ; Immunoglobulin E ; Quality of Life ; Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; East Asian People

Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with lower cervical fracture is often categorized into unstable fracture, with a high incidence of neurological injury and a high rate of disability and morbidity. As factors such as shoulder occlusion may affect the accuracy of X-ray imaging diagnosis, it is often easily misdiagnosed at the primary diagnosis. Non-operative treatment has complications such as bone nonunion and the possibility of secondary neurological damage, while the timing, access and choice of surgical treatment are still controversial. Currently, there are no clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of AS combined with lower cervical fracture with or without dislocation. To this end, the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts to formulate Clinical guidelines for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis combined with lower cervical fracture in adults ( version 2024) in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine, scientificity and practicality, in which 11 recommendations were put forward in terms of the diagnosis, imaging evaluation, typing and treatment, etc, to provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of AS combined with lower cervical fracture.

Objective:To investigate the effects of preoperative pre-rehabilitation on early functional recovery after knee arthroplasty under the multidisciplinary collaboration mode of accelerated rehabilitation surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 51 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics, Jinjiang Hospital from September 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into an observation group ( n = 24) and a control group ( n = 27). The observation group received pre-rehabilitation before knee replacement surgery, while the control group did not. After completing the admission procedures, patients in the observation group underwent rehabilitation evaluation in the rehabilitation clinic and received individualized rehabilitation training. The control group did not undergo preoperative pre-rehabilitation but underwent the same individualized rehabilitation training as the observation group. The rehabilitation specialist evaluated the patients' rehabilitation scores [hospital for special surgery knee (HSS) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score] at 2 and 5 days after surgery. The main outcome measures included the range of motion (ROM) of the patient's knee joint at 2 and 5 days after surgery, HSS score at 2 and 5 days after surgery, VAS score at 5 days after surgery, the number of days from surgery to discharge, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the rate of outpatient visits after surgery. Results:There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM of the knee joint between the observation and control groups at 2 days after surgery ( P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in score of ROM of the knee joint at 5 days after surgery between the two groups [(100.08 ± 7.75) points vs. (88.44 ± 16.09) points, t = 3.34, P = 0.002]. There was no significant difference in HSS score between the two groups at 2 days after surgery ( P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in HSS score between the two groups at 5 days after surgery [(62.84 ± 5.78) points vs. (57.09 ± 6.53) points, t = 3.31, P = 0.002]. There was a significant difference in VAS score (exercise) between the two groups at 5 days after surgery [(3.42 ± 1.02) points vs. (5.37 ± 1.15) points, t = -6.39, P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the number of days from surgery to discharge between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups ( P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the rate of outpatient visits between the two groups [7/17 vs. 1/26, χ2 = 4.45, P = 0.035]. Conclusion:Preoperative pre-rehabilitation in the accelerated rehabilitation surgery model under multidisciplinary collaboration can help improve the early function of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, reduce the pain of postoperative rehabilitation, improve the postoperative rehabilitation compliance, and ultimately enhance patient satisfaction with the surgery.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with spinal fractures with thoracic and lumbar fracture as the most common type shows characteristics of unstable fracture, high incidence of nerve injury, high mortality and high disability rate. The diagnosis may be missed because it is mostly caused by low-energy injury, when spinal rigidity and osteoporosis have a great impact on the accuracy of imaging examination. At the same time, the treatment choices are controversial, with no relevant specifications. Non-operative treatments can easily lead to bone nonunion, pseudoarthrosis and delayed nerve injury, while surgeries may be failed due to internal fixation failure. At present, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture. In this context, the Spinal Trauma Academic Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts to formulate the Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adult ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fracture ( version 2023) by following the principles of evidence-based medicine and systematically review related literatures. Ten recommendations on the diagnosis, imaging evaluation, classification and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture were put forward, aiming to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of such disorder.

The acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults have a higher rate of neurological injury and early death compared with atlas or axial fractures alone. Currently, the diagnosis and treatment choices of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults are controversial because of the lack of standards for implementation. Non-operative treatments have a high incidence of bone nonunion and complications, while surgeries may easily lead to the injury of the vertebral artery, spinal cord and nerve root. At present, there are no evidence-based Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults. To provide orthopedic surgeons with the most up-to-date and effective information in treating acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults, the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedic Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the field of spinal trauma to develop the Evidence-based guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults ( version 2023) by referring to the "Management of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults" published by American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) in 2013 and the relevant Chinese and English literatures. Ten recommendations were made concerning the radiological diagnosis, stability judgment, treatment rules, treatment options and complications based on medical evidence, aiming to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults.

Near-infrared spectroscopy(NIRS) combined with band screening method and modeling algorithm can be used to achieve the rapid and non-destructive detection of the traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) production process. This paper focused on the ginkgo leaf macroporous resin purification process, which is the key technology of Yinshen Tongluo Capsules, in order to achieve the rapid determination of quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin in effluent. The abnormal spectrum was eliminated by Mahalanobis distance algorithm, and the data set was divided by the sample set partitioning method based on joint X-Y distances(SPXY). The key information bands were selected by synergy interval partial least squares(siPLS); based on that, competitive adaptive reweighted sampling(CARS), successive projections algorithm(SPA) and Monte Carlo uninformative variable(MC-UVE) were used to select wavelengths to obtain less but more critical variable data. With selected key variables as input, the quantitative analysis model was established by genetic algorithm joint extreme learning machine(GA-ELM) algorithm. The performance of the model was compared with that of partial least squares regression(PLSR). The results showed that the combination with siPLS-CARS-GA-ELM could achieve the optimal model performance with the minimum number of variables. The calibration set correlation coefficient R_c and the validation set correlation coefficient R_p of quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin were all above 0.98. The root mean square error of calibration(RMSEC), the root mean square error of prediction(RMSEP) and the relative standard errors of prediction(RSEP) were 0.030 0, 0.029 2 and 8.88%, 0.041 4, 0.034 8 and 8.46%, 0.029 3, 0.027 1 and 10.10%, respectively. Compared with the PLSR me-thod, the performance of the GA-ELM model was greatly improved, which proved that NIRS combined with GA-ELM method has a great potential for rapid determination of effective components of TCM.
Algorithms ; Ginkgo biloba ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Plant Leaves ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared

According to the pathological characteristics of symptomatic chronic thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fracture (SCOVF), the different clinical treatment methods are selected, including vertebral augmentation, anterior-posterior fixation and fusion, posterior decompression fixation and fusion, and posterior correction osteotomy. However, there is still a lack of a unified understanding on how to choose appropriate treatment method for SCOVF. In order to reflect the new treatment concept and the evidence-based medicine progress of SCOVF in a timely manner and standardize its treatment, the clinical guideline for surgical treatment of SCOVF is formulated in compliance with the principle of scientificity, practicability and advancement and based on the level of evidence-based medicine.

Objective To investigate clinical effects and prognostic factors of transabdominal laparoscopic-assisted and open radical resection for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).Methods The retrospective cohort and case-control studies were conducted.The clinicopathologieal data of 84 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2014 to January 2017 were collected.Among 84 patients,42 undergoing transabdominal laparoscopic-assisted radical gastectomy (LARG) were allocated into LARG group and 42 undergoing transabdominal open radical gastectomy (ORG) were allocated into ORG group.Observation indicators:(1) comparison of intraoperative and postoperative recovery situations between groups;(2)comparison of follow-up and survival situations between groups;(3) prognostic analysis of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG undergoing transabdominal radical resection.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival situations,tumor recurrence and metastasis of patients up to January 2018.Measurement data with normal distribution were representde as-x±s,and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Comparison of count data were analyzed using the ehi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Ordinal data were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test.The survival rate and curve were respectively calculated and drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method,and Log-rank test was used for survival and univariate analyses.Multivariate analysis was done by COX proportional hazard model.Results (1) Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative recovery situations between groups:patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG in the LARG and ORG group underwent successful transabdominal radical resection,without conversion to thoracotomy.All patients in the LARG group underwent esophagojejunostomy with circular stapler device,38 and 4 patients in the ORG group underwent esophagojejunostomy with circular stapler and linear cut stapler respectively.Operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,length of incision,time of postoperative analgesia,cases with anastomotic bleeding,anastomotic leakage,abdominal bleeding,incisional infection,pulmonary infection,abdominal infection and reflux esophagitis of grade Ⅰ ～ Ⅱ postoperative complications and duration of postoperative stay were respectively (261±50)minutes,(119±111)mL,(7.8±1.6)cm,(2.1±1.3)days,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,(12.8 ± 1.9) days in LARG group and (216 ± 52) minutes,(230± 178) mL,(17.3± 1.8) cm,(3.4±1.2)days,2,0,2,2,2,1,2,(18.4±15.3)days in ORG group,with statistically significances between groups (t =2.357,2.960,2.195,2.013,x2 =5.486,t =2.125,P＜0.05).All patients with complications were improved by symptomatic treatment.(2) Comparison of follow-up and survival situations between groups:81 of 84patients including 41 in LARG group and 40 in ORG group were followed up for 6-48 months,with a median time of 29 months.The postoperative 2-year overall and tumor-free survival rates were respectively 85.1％ and 82.1％ of 41 patients in LARG group and 83.1％ and 79.3％ of 40 patients in ORG group,with no statistically significance between groups (x2 =0.013,0.049,P＞0.05).(3) Prognostic analysis of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG undergoing transabdominal radical resection:results of univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter,tumor TNM staging,tumor T staging,tumor N staging and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were related factors affecting prognosis of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG undergoing transabdominal radical resection (x2 =8.349,14.376,9.732,17.250,8.012,P＜0.05).Results of multivariate analysis showed that tumor TNM staging and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors affecting prognosis of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG undergoing transabdominal radical resection (risk ratio =4.305,0.031,95％ confidence interval:1.858-9.977,0.004-0.246,P＜0.05).Conclusions Transabdominal laparoscopicassisted radical resection for AEG is safe and feasible,with advantage of minimally invasiveness,having equivalent long-term effects compared to open surgery.Tumor TNM staging and postoperative chemotherapy are independent factors affecting prognosis of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG undergoing transabdominal radical resection.