Objective:To explore age-related variations in the angle of the cochlear basal turn using temporal bone CT, providing a reference for selecting the optimal Stenvers position radiographic projection angle in children and adults.Methods:The retrospective study included children and adults who underwent temporal bone CT scans at Beijing Tongren Hospital from November 2014 to April 2023. A total of 620 participants were included, including 368 males and 252 females. Patients were divided into 20 age-ralated groups: infants under one year old (3 to 11 months) were divided into monthly subgroups (9 groups); children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years were grouped biennially (9 groups); adults were divided into two groups: 19 to 29 years and 30 to 40 years. Using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) techniques, the CT images of the temporal bone were reformatted into oblique transverse sections to maximize the visibility of the cochlear basal turn.The cochlear basal turn angle was defined as the angle between the vertical axis of the cochlear basal turn and the mid-sagittal plane of the skull. Statistical analysis was performed to compare age-related differences in cochlear basal turn angles. Two additional patients were included to compare Stenvers position X-ray images with corresponding temporal bone CT scans, assessing the visibility of cochlear implant electrodes post-implantation.Results:Among infants aged 3 to 11 months, the cochlear basal turn angle was 29.4°±4.5°, with no significant differences observed between subgroups ( P>0.05). However, significant differences were found between infants (<1 year old) and the 1-2-year-old group compared to each age group from 3 to 40 years ( P<0.05). Additionally, the angles differed significantly between the 3-14-year-old groups and the 19-40-year-old groups ( P<0.05), whereas no significant differences were found among the remaining groups ( P>0.05). The visibility of the cochlear implant electrodes, appearing round in shape on standard Stenvers position X-ray images, closely resembled that observed in temporal bone CT scans. Conclusion:Age-related variations in the cochlear basal turn angle provide a valuable reference for optimizing Stenvers position radiography angles after cochlear implantation, improving the accuracy and quality of post-implantation imaging.

Objective:To investigate the status and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of adult CT radiation dose based on survey result from some hospitals in Beijing.Methods:From September to December 2023, the survey results for 50 hospitals were collected in Beijing, including 47 tertiary hospitals and 3 second grade general hospitals. The CT data sets in total of 20 items including head (sequential scanning), head (spiral scanning), head perfusion, sinus, neck, chest, chest (low dose scanning), abdomen, pelvis, abdomen-pelvis, chest-abdomen-pelvis, lumbar spine, CT urography, coronary CTA (retrospective), coronary CTA (prospective), head CTA, neck CTA, aorta CTA, leg CTA and knee were collected on clinical commonly used CT scanners with annual qualified state inspection. For each item, radiation dose data was collected continuously and randomly for up to 50 cases for every CT scanner. Using the volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) and dose length product (DLP) as dose parameters, the median value of each item in each hospital was obtained. The median CTDI vol and DLP values of all hospitals were arranged, and the local DRL of each item was set as the 75th percentile of the median values. The obtained DRLs were compared with the DRLs issued by domestic and international radiological protection organizations. Results:A total of 26 031 dose values of adult patients were collected and 25 996 dose values were left while 35 invalid values removed.For different CT users, CTDl vol, DLP and scanning phases were different for the same item. The five items with the highest CTDI were head perfusion, head sequential scanning, head spiral scanning, coronary CTA (retrospective mode), and sinus. The five items with the highest DLP were CTU, head perfusion, leg CTA, chest-abdomen-pelvis and aortic CTA. The CTDI vol of CTU was only 16.9 mGy (75th percentile), while the DLP was as high as 2 394.9 mGy·cm (75th percentile). The survey showed that the DRLs of most items in Beijing was lower than the national DRLs of domestic and foreign standards, and the DRLs of a small number of items were slightly higher. Conclusion:The current CT dose level in Beijing is not consistent with national DRLs released at home and abroad, so it is necessary to establish local DRLs according to the clinical status in Beijing.

Objective:To investigate the radiation dose levels of digital radiography (DR) in adult patients and explore the diagnostic reference level (DRL) of radiation dose in Beijing.Methods:Radiation dose data were collected from 39 medical institutions in Beijing on 18 930 DR examinations of chest anterior and lateral view, abdomen anterior and posterior view, abdomen standing view, cervical spine anterior and lateral view, lumbar spine anterior and lateral view, knee joint anterior and lateral view as well as 5 266 digital mammography (CC view and MLO view). For ordinary DR examinations, the incident air kinetic energy ( Ka, i), incident air specific kinetic energy area product ( PKA) and effective dose ( E) to the examined individuals were used for the investigation and estimation of radiation dose. For digital mammography, the average glandular dose (AGD) was calculated. DRLs should be set at the 75 th percentile of median values obtained in each medical institution. Results:The Ka, i, PKA and E of DRL for Chest (PA), Chest (lateral), abdominal(PA), abdominal (AP), Pelvic(AP), Cervical (AP), Cervical (lateral), Lumbar (AP), Lumbar (lateral), Knee joint (AP) and Knee joint (lateral) of conventional DR were 0.14, 0.31, 1.25, 2.18, 1.86, 0.51, 0.14, 2.97, 8.39, 0.37, 0.37 mGy, 159, 259, 1 917, 2 336, 2 867, 312, 301, 3 500, 3 359, 269, 255 mGy·cm 2, 0.03, 0.05, 0.20, 0.43, 0.23, 0.03, 0.02, 0.47, 0.35, <0.001, <0.001 mSv. The DRLs for digital mammography were calculated to be 1.87 mGy (CC view), 1.94 mGy (MLO view) and 3.99 mGy (accumulated for one examination). Conclusions:The radiation dose from DR examinations is relatively low. In clinical practice, the selection of imaging parameters should be further standardized on the basis of the local DRL.

Objective:To investigate the status and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of adult CT radiation dose based on survey result from some hospitals in Beijing.Methods:From September to December 2023, the survey results for 50 hospitals were collected in Beijing, including 47 tertiary hospitals and 3 second grade general hospitals. The CT data sets in total of 20 items including head (sequential scanning), head (spiral scanning), head perfusion, sinus, neck, chest, chest (low dose scanning), abdomen, pelvis, abdomen-pelvis, chest-abdomen-pelvis, lumbar spine, CT urography, coronary CTA (retrospective), coronary CTA (prospective), head CTA, neck CTA, aorta CTA, leg CTA and knee were collected on clinical commonly used CT scanners with annual qualified state inspection. For each item, radiation dose data was collected continuously and randomly for up to 50 cases for every CT scanner. Using the volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) and dose length product (DLP) as dose parameters, the median value of each item in each hospital was obtained. The median CTDI vol and DLP values of all hospitals were arranged, and the local DRL of each item was set as the 75th percentile of the median values. The obtained DRLs were compared with the DRLs issued by domestic and international radiological protection organizations. Results:A total of 26 031 dose values of adult patients were collected and 25 996 dose values were left while 35 invalid values removed.For different CT users, CTDl vol, DLP and scanning phases were different for the same item. The five items with the highest CTDI were head perfusion, head sequential scanning, head spiral scanning, coronary CTA (retrospective mode), and sinus. The five items with the highest DLP were CTU, head perfusion, leg CTA, chest-abdomen-pelvis and aortic CTA. The CTDI vol of CTU was only 16.9 mGy (75th percentile), while the DLP was as high as 2 394.9 mGy·cm (75th percentile). The survey showed that the DRLs of most items in Beijing was lower than the national DRLs of domestic and foreign standards, and the DRLs of a small number of items were slightly higher. Conclusion:The current CT dose level in Beijing is not consistent with national DRLs released at home and abroad, so it is necessary to establish local DRLs according to the clinical status in Beijing.

Objective:To investigate the radiation dose levels of digital radiography (DR) in adult patients and explore the diagnostic reference level (DRL) of radiation dose in Beijing.Methods:Radiation dose data were collected from 39 medical institutions in Beijing on 18 930 DR examinations of chest anterior and lateral view, abdomen anterior and posterior view, abdomen standing view, cervical spine anterior and lateral view, lumbar spine anterior and lateral view, knee joint anterior and lateral view as well as 5 266 digital mammography (CC view and MLO view). For ordinary DR examinations, the incident air kinetic energy ( Ka, i), incident air specific kinetic energy area product ( PKA) and effective dose ( E) to the examined individuals were used for the investigation and estimation of radiation dose. For digital mammography, the average glandular dose (AGD) was calculated. DRLs should be set at the 75 th percentile of median values obtained in each medical institution. Results:The Ka, i, PKA and E of DRL for Chest (PA), Chest (lateral), abdominal(PA), abdominal (AP), Pelvic(AP), Cervical (AP), Cervical (lateral), Lumbar (AP), Lumbar (lateral), Knee joint (AP) and Knee joint (lateral) of conventional DR were 0.14, 0.31, 1.25, 2.18, 1.86, 0.51, 0.14, 2.97, 8.39, 0.37, 0.37 mGy, 159, 259, 1 917, 2 336, 2 867, 312, 301, 3 500, 3 359, 269, 255 mGy·cm 2, 0.03, 0.05, 0.20, 0.43, 0.23, 0.03, 0.02, 0.47, 0.35, <0.001, <0.001 mSv. The DRLs for digital mammography were calculated to be 1.87 mGy (CC view), 1.94 mGy (MLO view) and 3.99 mGy (accumulated for one examination). Conclusions:The radiation dose from DR examinations is relatively low. In clinical practice, the selection of imaging parameters should be further standardized on the basis of the local DRL.

Objective:To explore age-related variations in the angle of the cochlear basal turn using temporal bone CT, providing a reference for selecting the optimal Stenvers position radiographic projection angle in children and adults.Methods:The retrospective study included children and adults who underwent temporal bone CT scans at Beijing Tongren Hospital from November 2014 to April 2023. A total of 620 participants were included, including 368 males and 252 females. Patients were divided into 20 age-ralated groups: infants under one year old (3 to 11 months) were divided into monthly subgroups (9 groups); children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years were grouped biennially (9 groups); adults were divided into two groups: 19 to 29 years and 30 to 40 years. Using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) techniques, the CT images of the temporal bone were reformatted into oblique transverse sections to maximize the visibility of the cochlear basal turn.The cochlear basal turn angle was defined as the angle between the vertical axis of the cochlear basal turn and the mid-sagittal plane of the skull. Statistical analysis was performed to compare age-related differences in cochlear basal turn angles. Two additional patients were included to compare Stenvers position X-ray images with corresponding temporal bone CT scans, assessing the visibility of cochlear implant electrodes post-implantation.Results:Among infants aged 3 to 11 months, the cochlear basal turn angle was 29.4°±4.5°, with no significant differences observed between subgroups ( P>0.05). However, significant differences were found between infants (<1 year old) and the 1-2-year-old group compared to each age group from 3 to 40 years ( P<0.05). Additionally, the angles differed significantly between the 3-14-year-old groups and the 19-40-year-old groups ( P<0.05), whereas no significant differences were found among the remaining groups ( P>0.05). The visibility of the cochlear implant electrodes, appearing round in shape on standard Stenvers position X-ray images, closely resembled that observed in temporal bone CT scans. Conclusion:Age-related variations in the cochlear basal turn angle provide a valuable reference for optimizing Stenvers position radiography angles after cochlear implantation, improving the accuracy and quality of post-implantation imaging.

Objective:To explore and compare the impacts of different scanning protocols on image quality and radiation dose in chest computed tomography (CT) scans.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted for the data of 65 randomly selected patients who underwent chest CT scans using a tube voltage of 120 kV, the automatic modulation technique for tube current, and z-axis radiation dose modulation at the Emergency Department of our hospital from June to July 2023. The enrolled cases were divided into two groups: the high-resolution group ( n = 34) and the conventional group ( n = 31), with the settings for scanning protocols identical to those for phantom scans. For patients in both groups, thin-layer images of the cross-sections in the lung and mediastinal windows were reconstructed using thickness/intervals of 1 mm/1 mm and 2 mm/1 mm, respectively. Meanwhile, high-resolution and conventional CT scans were conducted using a Catphan500 phantom under a tube voltage of 120 kV and a tube current of 150 mAs. Of both scanning protocols, the high-resolution CT scan utilized the lung nodule-orientated scanning mode, pitch of 1.5, and a detector combination providing a collimation of 16 × 0.75 mm. In contrast, the conventional CT scan was performed using the body-orientated scanning mode, pitch of 0.813, and a detector combination providing a collimation of 16 × 1.5 mm. Then, the high-contrast resolutions of the phantom images obtained using the two scanning protocols were objectively evaluated. Both coronal chest images in the lung window and cross-sectional images in the mediastinal window were reconstructed with a thickness/interval of 5 mm/5 mm for both groups. Then, the obtained images were imported into the Radimetrics system to compare the body size-specific dose estimation (SSDE), doses to sensitive organs on the body surface, and scanning time of both groups. For the cross-sectional images in the mediastinal window, the contrast-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and figure-of-merit (FOM) were measured and calculated at the fixed anatomical parts. For the cross-sectional images in the lung window, their quality was subjectively evaluated by two senior diagnostic radiologists. Results:The result of phantom scans indicated that high-resolution CT scans yielded images with an approximately 5% increase in the spatial resolution in the xy-plane and a nearly 20% increase in the spatial resolution along the z-axis compared to conventional CT scans. The result of clinical data demonstrated that the conventional group exhibited significantly higher doses to the thyroid and the female breast ( t = 2.8, 2.3, P < 0.05), along with notably elevated SNR, CNR, and FOM values of the right trapezius, compared to the high-resolution group ( t = 4.1, 5.8, z=4.4, P < 0.001). However, the high-resolution group manifested significantly higher SNR, CNR, and FOM values of the thoracic aorta compared to the conventional group ( t = 3.4, 4.4, z=3.4, P < 0.001). In addition, the cross-sectional and coronal images in the lung window of the clinical cases in the high-resolution group exhibited more stable quality, with subjective scores exceeding 4 and the average scores of both groups not statistically significantly different. Conclusions:For chest CT examination, high-resolution CT scans are more suitable for observations focusing on the details of the lungs and mediastinum, while conventional CT is more suitable for those centering on soft tissues on the body surface.

Objective:To investigate the trend of radiological diagnostic examination frequency and the related influencing factors in a general hospital in recent four years.Methods:The hospital information system and the radiology information system were used to collect the information on the numbers of the outpatients, the emergency patients, and the inpatients and the radiology examination information from 2019 to 2022. The examination frequency and proportion of various imaging equipment were counted by using the perspective table of data, and the examination items and the proportion of the radiological diagnostic examinations were calculated. The positive rates of the radiological examinations were measured from 2019 to 2022. The gender and age distribution of the patients were analyzed. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationships between the numbers of the patients undergoing radiological examinations and the numbers of the outpatients, emergency patients and the inpatients.Results:The annual frequency of radiological diagnostic examinations from 2019 to 2022 were 307 306, 245 418, 317 250 and 325 625, respectively, with a total of 1 195 599. Among them, the proportions of CT, X-rays, bedside X-rays, bone density, gastrointestinal imaging and mammography were 59.74%, 38.04%, 1.39%, 0.42%, 0.21% and 0.19%, respectively. In each year, the proportion of CT in all radiological diagnostic examinations was 49.58%, 63.40%, 60.40% and 65.20%, respectively. The frequency of emergency CT and emergency chest CT was correlated with the number of emergency patients( r =0.63, 0.61, P<0.05), and the frequency of non-emergency CT was correlated with the number of outpatients and inpatients ( r =0.61, 0.66, P<0.05). The positive rates of the CT examinations were higher than 80% except the lowest of 79.95% in 2021. Conclusions:Radiological examinations especially CT examinations have increased significantly, and played an important role in the diagnosis of diseases. However, attention should be paid to the Justification of the CT examinations. Timely statistical analysis of radiological examination information can provide data supports and references for scientific management of radiological examinations.

Objective:To explore the image quality and its evaluation method using virtual grid under different tube voltages in the clinical chest X-ray exam.Methods:According to the conditions of chest X-ray photography commonly used in clinical practice, the corresponding thickness of plexiglass (20 cm, including CDRAD phantom) was determined as the experimental object. With a fixed tube loading of 4 mAs and the tube voltage from 60 to 125 kV, the experimental object was imaged in three ways: physical grid, none grid and virtual grid. The common physical parameters (CNR, σ, C, SNR), texture analysis (Angular second moment, texture Contrast, Correlation, Inverse difference moment, Entropy) and CDRAD phantom score (IQF inv) were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test was used for each group of common physical parameters, and further pairwise comparisons were made. At the same time, applying virtual grids on the obtained images with chest anthropomorphic model and texture indexing the images with and without virtual grids, then rank sum test of paired sample can be conducted. Results:There were differences in image quality among the three groups of grid mode( P<0.05), and the physical grid delivered the best image quality. The tube voltage had an impact on all image quality evaluation indexes ( P<0.05). The tube voltage was positively correlated with CNR, SNR, angular second moment, inverse difference moment and IQF inv ( P<0.05), and negatively correlated with σ, C, texture contrast and entropy ( P<0.05). There was no significant correlation between the tube voltage and Correlation ( P>0.05). The chest anthropomorphic model images were used to evaluate the virtual grids, and the texture indexes (Angle second moment, Contrast, Correlation, Inverse difference moment, Entropy) were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions:The virtual grid can improve the image quality of chest X-ray photography, and the image texture analysis method can be a useful supplement to the image quality evaluation parameters.

Objective:To evaluate the influence of different detector widths and signal acquisition positions of wide-detector CT in different scanning modes on CT number and noise, and to provide a basis for reasonable selection of scanning modes and related parameters in clinical practice.Methods:The body dose phantom was scanned by GE Revolution CT. The scan was performed with detector widths of 40, 80 and 160 mm in sequential scanning mode and with detector width/pitch combinations of 40 mm/0.516, 40 mm/0.984, 80 mm/0.508 and 80 mm/0.992 in spiral scanning mode. The phantom was placed at the central and peripheral of the selected detector widths, and the adjacent positions between two axial scans. The images of the phantom were evaluated subjectively and the CT numbers and SDs were measured. The differences between the measured values at different imaging parameters were compared. The multi-group Friedman test was used to compare CT numbers and SD under different scanning parameters in sequential scanning mode, and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare CT numbers and SD in spiral scanning mode.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the geometric shapes of the phantom images obtained at any combination of parameters. In sequential scanning mode, the differences at different detector widths were statistically significant (χ 2=14.00, P=0.001) with CT numbers at 40 mm and 160 mm greater than CT numbers at 80 mm ( P<0.05). The differences at different signal acquisition positions were statistically significant (χ 2=12.04, P=0.002) with CT numbers at peripheral and adjacent greater than CT numbers at central ( P<0.05). In spiral scanning mode CT numbers at detector width at 80 mm were greater than CT numbers at 40 mm ( Z=-2.10, P=0.036). For SD, the differences at different detector widths were statistically significant in sequential scanning modes (χ 2=8.17, P=0.017) with SD at 160 mm greater than SD at 80 mm ( P<0.05). The differences at different signal acquisition positions were statistically significant (χ 2=13.50, P=0.001) with SD at peripheral greater than SD at central ( P<0.05). In spiral scanning mode SDs at pitches 0.984 and 0.992 were greater than SDs at 0.516 and 0.508 ( Z=-2.66, P=0.008). There were no significant differences among other groups. Conclusion:The selection of scanning mode, detector width and signal acquisition position of wide-detector CT will affect the image CT numbers and SDs.