Humans ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Pulmonary Embolism ; Patients ; Hospitalization ; Risk Factors

PURPOSE: Static progressive stretch (SPS) can be applied to treat chronic joint stiffness. However, the impacts of subacute application of SPS to the distal lower limbs, where deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common, on venous thromboembolism remain unclear. This study aims to explore the risk of venous thromboembolism events following subacute application of SPS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with DVT following a lower extremity orthopedic surgery before being transferred to the rehabilitation ward from May 2017 to May 2022. Patients with unilateral lower limb comminuted para-articular fractures, transferred to rehabilitation ward for further treatment within 3 weeks after operation, followed up more than 12 weeks since initial manual physiotherapy, and diagnosed DVT by ultrasound before rehabilitation course were included in the study. Patients with polytrauma, without evidence of previous peripheral vascular disease or incompetence, had medication for thrombosis treatment or prophylaxis before the operation, detected with paralysis due to nervous system impairment, infected after operation during the regime, or with acute progression of DVT were excluded. The included patients were randomized to the standard physiotherapy and the SPS integrated groups for observation. Associated DVT and pulmonary embolism data were collected during the physiotherapy course to compare the groups. SSPS 28.0 and GraphPad Prism 9 were used for data processing. A p < 0.05 was set significant difference. RESULTS: In total of 154 patients with DVT participating in this study, 75 of them were treated with additional SPS for postoperative rehabilitation. The participants in the SPS group showed improved range of motion (12.3° ± 6.7°). However, in the SPS group, there was no difference in thrombosis volume between the start and termination (p = 0.106, p = 0.787, respectively), although difference was seen intra-therapy (p < 0.001). Contingency analysis revealed the pulmonary embolism incidence (OR = 0.703) in the SPS group compared to the mean physiotherapy. CONCLUSION The SPS technique is a safe and reliable option to prevent potential joint stiffness without aggravating the risk of distal DVT for postoperative patients suffering from relevant trauma.
Humans ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Venous Thrombosis/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Pulmonary Embolism/complications* ; Lower Extremity ; Risk Factors

Patients with critical illness are at the high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the older the patient, the higher the incidence of VTE. Despite its poor prognosis, VTE is preventable. At present, although there are many consensus or guidelines on the prevention of VTE at home and abroad, there is still a lack of consensus or guidelines for the prevention of VTE in elderly patients with critical illness. In order to standardize the prevention of VTE in elderly patients with critical illness in China, Expert consensus on the prevention of venous thromboembolism for elderly patients with critical illness in China (2023) was developed by Critical Care Medicine Division of Chinese Geriatric Society and Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine. Members of the working group consulted relevant domestic and foreign guidelines, integrated evidence-based medical evidence and clinical experience, formed the draft consensus, submitted it to the expert group for discussion for many times, revised it for many times, and finally sent it to the expert group in the form of electronic questionnaire, and the expert gave a comprehensive score according to the theoretical basis, scientific nature and feasibility of the consensus items. The recommendation strength of each item was determined, and 21 recommendations were finally formed to provide reference for the prevention of VTE in elderly patients with critical illness.
Humans ; Aged ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Critical Illness ; Consensus ; China ; Anticoagulants

Atrial Fibrillation/complications* ; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/complications* ; Humans ; Thromboembolism/prevention & control*

Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in severe trauma patients. Primary fibrinolytic hyperactivity combined with hemorrhage and consequential hypercoagulability in severe trauma patients create a huge challenge for clinicians. It is crucial to ensure a safe anticoagulant therapy for trauma patients, but a series of clinical issues need to be answered first, for example, what are the risk factors for traumatic venous thromboembolism? How to assess and determine the status of coagulation dysfunction of patients? When is the optimal timing to initiate pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism? What types of prophylactic agents should be used? How to manage the anticoagulation-related hemorrhage and to determine the optimal timing of restarting chemoprophylaxis? The present review attempts to answer the above questions.
Anticoagulants/adverse effects* ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control* ; Risk Factors ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control*

OBJECTIVE: To observe preventive effect of Caprini based thrombosis risk evaluation model on venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement (TKA). METHODS: Totally 257 TKA patients were admitted from May 2017 to December 2021 were selected. They were divided into conventional intervention strategies (121 patients in control group) and intervention strategies based on Caprini thrombosis risk evaluation model (136 patients in observation group), based on whether Caprini thrombosis risk evaluation model was introduced in May 2019. In normal gourp, there were 79 males and 42 females aged from 50 to 78 years old with an average of (63.10±11.86) years old;body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 32 with an average of (25.21±4.95) kg/m2;55 patients on the left side and 66 on the right side. In observation group, there were 81 males and 55 females aged from 50 to 78 years old with an average of (64.35±10.54) years old;BMI ranged from 19 to 32 with an average of (24.43±5.18) kg/m²;87 patients on the left side and 49 on the right side. The incidence of VTE, visual analogue scale (VAS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, affected limb swelling, mean velocity(Vm), peak velocity (PV), D-dimer (D-D), prothrombin time(PT), and incidence of complications were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The incidence of VTE in observation group was 1.47%(2/136), and 9.09%(11/121) in control group, and there was statistically difference between two groups (χ²=6.976, P=0.008). At 7 days after operation, VAS, HSS score and the difference in circumference of the affected limb in observation group were significantly better than those in control group, and had statistically differences (P<0.05). Blood flow Vm and PV levels between two groups were significantly increased (P<0.001), and blood flow Vm and PV levels in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group on the 7th day after operation, and had differences (P<0.001). The serum D-D level in observation group was significantly lower than that of in control group on the 7th day after operation, and PT level was significantly higher than that of in control group, and had difference(P<0.05). There was no difference in total incidence of complications between two groups (χ²=4.488, P=0.034). CONCLUSION Intervention strategy based on caprini thrombus risk evluation model could effectively reduce incidence of VTE and complications in TKA patients, improve swelling, hemodynamics and coagulation function of the affected limbs, and contribute to recovery of knee joint function.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Thrombosis/complications* ; Hospitalization ; Incidence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

BACKGROUND: Aspirin has demonstrated safety and efficacy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, inconsistent dose regimens have been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of 100 mg aspirin twice daily with rivaroxaban in VTE prophylaxis following THA. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective unilateral primary THA between January 2019 and January 2020 were prospectively enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to receive 5 weeks of VTE prophylaxis with either oral enteric-coated aspirin (100 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily). Medication safety and efficacy were comprehensively evaluated through symptomatic VTE incidence, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on Doppler ultrasonography, total blood loss (TBL), laboratory bloodwork, Harris hip score (HHS), post-operative recovery, and the incidence of other complications. RESULTS: We included 70 patients in this study; 34 and 36 were allocated to receive aspirin and rivaroxaban prophylaxis, respectively. No cases of symptomatic VTE occurred in this study. The DVT rate on Doppler ultrasonography in the aspirin group was not significantly different from that in the rivaroxaban group (8.8% vs. 8.3%, χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.91), confirming the non-inferiority of aspirin for DVT prophylaxis (χ2 = 2.29, P = 0.01). The calculated TBL in the aspirin group (944.9 mL [658.5-1137.8 mL]) was similar to that in the rivaroxaban group (978.3 mL [747.4-1740.6mL]) (χ2 = 1.55, P = 0.12). However, there were no significant inter-group differences in HHS at post-operative day (POD) 30 (Aspirin: 81.0 [78.8-83.0], Rivaroxaban: 81.0 [79.3-83.0], χ2 = 0.43, P = 0.67) and POD 90 (Aspirin: 90.0 [89.0-92.0], Rivaroxaban: 91.5 [88.3-92.8], χ2 = 0.77, P = 0.44), the incidence of bleeding events (2.9% vs. 8.3%, χ2 = 0.96, P = 0.33), or gastrointestinal complications (2.9% vs. 5.6%, χ2 = 1.13, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In terms of safety and efficacy, the prophylactic use of 100 mg aspirin twice daily was not statistically different from that of rivaroxaban in preventing VTE and reducing the risk of blood loss following elective primary THA. This supports the use of aspirin chemoprophylaxis following THA as a less expensive and more widely available option for future THAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chictr.org, ChiCTR18000202894; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=33284.
Anticoagulants ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Aspirin/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use* ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control*

Object We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases in patients with active cancer. Methods: To find randomized controlled trials (RCT) in which NOACs were compared VKAs in active cancer, we searched the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Clinical Trials) up to May 2019 and and languages restricted to Chinese and English. According to the screening strategy, two researchers independently screened and extracted literature, evaluated the quality of literature, the suitability of collected cross study data for analysis, and tested the heterogeneity. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of major bleeding, clinically related non-major bleeding, VTE, stroke and all-cause mortality in active cancer patients with VTE, active cancer patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) was calculated and the results were compared between NOAC with VKA. Results: A total of 9 RCTs were included, including 5 cancers with VTE (5/9) and 4 cancers with NVAF (4/9). A total of 5 867 patients were included. After excluding 1 818 (30.99%) patients with cancer history, 4 049 (68.86%) patients with active cancer were statistically analyzed. Among them, 2 278 (56.26%) received NOAC treatment, 1 771 patients (43.74%) received VKA treatment. The quality of the included documents was high (all scores were>5 points), and the data of each included document could be summarized and analyzed (P>0.05). The heterogeneity of main outcome events was very low (I² = 0). In VTE patients with active cancer, NOACs were more effective in reducing recurrence of VTE （RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.36 -0.84; P = 0.005) and clinically related non-major bleeding (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.60 -0.98; P = 0.03) than VKAs. In NVAF patients with active cancer, efficacy of NOACs and VKAs was similar in terms of reducing VTE, stroke, clinically related non-major bleeding, major bleeding and all-cause mortality events (P>0.05). Conclusions: For patients with active cancer accompanied by VTE, NOAC may has more advantages in efficacy and safety compared to VKA in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases.
Administration, Oral ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Vitamin K/therapeutic use*

China ; Consensus ; Expert Testimony ; Humans ; Neoplasms ; surgery ; Perioperative Period ; Thoracic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Venous Thromboembolism ; etiology ; prevention & control

Humans ; Perioperative Period ; Thoracic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Venous Thromboembolism ; etiology ; prevention & control