Objective: Spinal stenosis and degenerative spinal disorders are increasingly prevalent and have a substantial impact on quality of life. Surgical decompression, performed using either open microscopic or endoscopic approaches, remains a cornerstone of management for these conditions. This study examines evolving trends in single-level lumbar spinal decompression procedures performed at a tertiary academic hospital in Singapore. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted involving 588 patients who underwent single-level spinal decompression between 2021 and 2024, including endoscopic spine surgery (ESS; n=364) and microdecompression (n=224). Primary outcome measures were changes in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, reoperation rates, and operative time. Patient demographics, spinal level and pathology characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis was used to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in SF-36 and VAS scores. At 2 years, Short Form Health Survey physical function (SFPF) scores improved in the endoscopic group (mean difference [MD], 18.6; standard deviation [SD], 21.7; p=0.064) and in the open microscopic group (MD, 36.7; SD, 20.9; p=0.007), with a non-significant DID of -18.1 (p=0.155). No DID comparisons across SF-36 domains reached statistical significance. Mean operative time for endoscopic procedures decreased from 249 minutes in 2022 to 145 minutes in 2024, reflecting a procedural learning curve. Surgeons with higher endoscopic caseloads exhibited greater improvements in functional outcomes. Conclusion Both endoscopic and open microscopic decompression achieve comparable short- and long-term clinical outcomes. ESS provides similar effectiveness while being associated with shorter recovery periods and reduced hospital stay. Further research is warranted to identify factors contributing to incomplete symptom resolution or the need for revision surgery.

Bleeding is a commonly encountered problem in spine surgery. The increasing popularity of endoscopic spine surgery poses new challenges to spine surgeons, especially those who are embarking on the learning curve. Hemostasis in endoscopic spine surgery can be difficult due to the narrow working channel and bleeding obscuring the endoscopic view, which hinders hemostasis and effective continuation of the operation. To minimize the risk of bleeding and improve hemostasis, a multimodal approach should be employed, including appropriate strategies for perioperative prevention, intraoperative surgical techniques, and postoperative correction/care. In this technical review article, we discuss several hemostatic techniques that are commonly used in endoscopic spine surgery. We also describe a new bone wax application technique in endoscopic spine surgery—called the “bone wax on pattie” technique—to avoid bone wax sticking onto the working channel/endoscope lens, while enabling easier application of bone wax onto the bleeding bone surface. We share some of our experiences with hemostasis in endoscopic spine surgery, and we hope to gather feedback from fellow spine surgeons around the world, so that we can contribute to further developments in the field together.