PURPOSE: . This study aimed to evaluate the influence of implant placement depth on the accuracy of five full-arch digital impression techniques: 2 photogrammetry systems (Imetric [PGI] and Oxo Core [PGO]) and 3 intraoral scanning (IOS) routes (standard IOS, IOS with crown-shaped [IOS+C], and IOS with laterally-extending [IOS+LE] scanning aids). MATERIALS AND METHODS: . Three master models including 5 implants with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm subgingival implant depths were fabricated. Implant positions were recorded using each of the 5 techniques (n = 15). The resultant scans were compared to reference data generated by a laboratory scanner. Deviations were 3-dimensionally assessed using root mean square values to quantify both trueness and precision. Angular deviations (AD) were calculated to provide a detailed assessment of spatial inconsistencies. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). RESULTS: . Implant depth and impression technique, as well as their interaction, significantly affected trueness, precision, and angular deviation values (P < .001). PGI demonstrated the highest accuracy, with the lowest mean AD values across all implant positions (0.24 – 0.32°) and the highest trueness (26.57 μm) and precision (7.72 μm). IOS exhibited the largest distortions, with AD values up to 1.77° and trueness values of 74.84 μm. Precision of both photogrammetry systems were not influenced by implant depth. CONCLUSION . Implant depth significantly impacts the accuracy metrics of full-arch digital impressions. The Imetric system outperformed the other groups. Since laterally-extending scanning aids effectively improved accuracy, it may be recommended as a clinically viable alternative to standard IOS.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to assess carpal tunnel syndrome's (CTS’s) ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and compare them with healthy controls. Methods: Thirty-nine PsA and twenty-eight healthy volunteers were examined in this study. Demographic and clinical features were recorded. CTS-6, a diagnostic algorithm, was used to estimate the probability of CTS. Electrodiagnostic study (EDS) was applied to all wrists included in the report, where the diagnosis of CTS was made by EDS. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at pisiform bone level by US and MRI. Results: Regarding to the demographic characteristics, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Twelve of 39 (30.76%) PsA patients had CTS, whereas CTS was not detected in the control group (p=0.001). US and MRI showed increased median nerve CSA in PsA patients compared to healthy controls (p=0.005, p<0.001; respectively). Also, US and MRI showed increased median nerve CSA in CTS patients compared to others (p=0.002, p<0.001; respectively). The Pearson correlation coefficient between MRI and US measurements of the CSA was 0.85 (p<0.001). Conclusion CTS frequency in PsA patients is found higher than healthy controls. The relationship between CTS diagnosed by EDS and CSA measured by both US and MRI was observed in PsA patients.