1.Study of Responsiveness of the Japanese Version of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool 2 (EFAT2-J) in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Yuto ZOGO ; Takashi MATSUMOTO ; Keita HOSHINO ; Tetsuya TSUJI
Palliative Care Research 2025;20(2):119-127
Objective: The Japanese version of Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool 2 (EFAT2-J) is a physical function assessment specifically for patients with advanced cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine the responsiveness of the EFAT2-J total score and to determine the clinical usefulness of the EFAT2-J. Methods: Participants were cancer patients who were being treated by a palliative care team and were not receiving curative treatment. Responsiveness was determined by comparing and correlating changes in the EFAT2-J and existing assessment scales up to approximately 2 weeks after the start of rehabilitation and calculating the standardized response means (SRM). Results: The participants were 31 patients with advanced cancer. The SRM of the EFAT2-J was large, and those of the existing assessment scales were moderate and small. Discussion: The EFAT2-J is an excellent physical function assessment that accurately captures changes in physical function in patients with advanced cancer.
2.Activities to Learn The Importance of Advance Care Planning from The Perspective of Emergency Medicine
Nobuyuki UCHIDA ; Yoko SHIMAMURA ; Akiko NAKAMURA ; Tetsuya HOSHINO ; Toru MARUHASHI ; Toshihiro NAKAJIMA ; Keiichi YAMADA ; Shouichi SAITOU ; Akira SUNOHARA
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association 2020;43(2):70-72
3.Alendronate and Raloxifene Therapy in the Early Period after Hip Fracture
Tsuyoshi Ohishi ; Tetsuya Ichikawa ; Takanori Ito ; Hiroshi Koyama ; Michihito Miyagi ; Hironobu Hoshino ; Masaaki Takahashi ;
Journal of Rural Medicine 2011;6(1):16-21
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of alendronate and raloxifene for preventing bone loss in patients with hip fracture by monitoring bone mineral densities (BMDs) and biochemical markers during the 9-month period after fracture. Patients and Methods: Eighty-two female hip fracture patients from 50 to 99 years old (mean ± SD: 81.6 ± 9.5) were randomly divided into two groups; there were 46 patients in the alendronate-treated group (group ALN) and 36 patients in the raloxifene-treated group (group RLX). Drugs were administered to patients six weeks after their operations. Lumbar spine BMD and neck, trochanter, Ward's and total BMDs of the contralateral proximal femur, serum intact osteocalcin (intact OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) were measured just before the start of drug administration and at 9 months thereafter. Results: Twenty-two out of 46 patients in group ALN and 23 out of 36 patients in group RLX completed the study. The most common reason for dropping out was the patient's failure to visit the outpatient clinic. Trochanter BMD in group ALN tended to increase by 8.4% compared with the baseline, and total hip BMD in group RLX showed a significant increase (5.7%), although neck BMD in both groups decreased during the 9 months of treatment (–8.7% for group ALN and –4.2% for group RLX compared with the baseline). Spine BMD did not change significantly in eithr group. Serum BAP and urinary NTX decreased significantly in both groups. Serum intact OC did not change significantly. Conclusions: Both alendronate and raloxifene have a favorable effect on trochanter and total BMDs of the contralateral proximal femur in the short period after hip fracture. However, both drugs could not prevent bone loss in the femoral neck during the 9 months of treatment.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail