Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the operation treated of unilateral unstable sacral fracture with S 1 dysplasia by bi-perforative screws of the middle and posterior pelvic columns. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients with proximal S 1 dysplasia and unilateral unstable sacral fractures treated at Tianjin Hospital, from January 2018 to January 2023. The cohort included 10 males and 8 females, with an average age of 46.3±1.2 years (range, 18-56 years). The causes of injury were traffic accidents in 12 cases and falls in 6 cases. All patients had combined anterior pelvic ring injuries, including 14 cases of simple fractures and 4 cases of fractures combined with pubic symphysis injuries. Preoperative neuro-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed that the lumbosacral nerves were not compressed by fracture fragments or displaced bone ends. According to the Dennis classification, there were 8 cases of type I and 10 cases of type II sacral fractures. Abnormalities in S 1 development included 9 cases of steep slopes, 6 cases of anterior rim depression, and 3 cases of both deformities simultaneously. There were 2 cases of nerve injury, both of which were Gibbons grade II. The average time from injury to surgery was 5.4±1.7 days (range, 4-14 days). All patients underwent combined anterior and posterior pelvic fixation in a single stage, with sacral fractures fixed using bi-perforative screws of posterior pelvic ring. The following parameters were recorded: screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, fracture healing time, accuracy of internal fixation placement, postoperative infection rate, and iatrogenic injury incidence. The Mears scoring system was used to evaluate the satisfaction rate of sacral fracture reduction, the Gibbons classification was used to assess neurological recovery, and the Majeed score was used to evaluate pelvic function. Results:The average screw placement time was 38.7±3.5 min for S 1 and 16.5±1.3 min for the posterior column. The average blood loss during screw placement was 30.53±1.61 ml, and the average fluoroscopy time was 11.3±3.2 s. No vascular or nerve injuries occurred in any case after the operation. All sacral fractures healed, with an average healing time of 7.6±2.2 months (range, 3-12 months). No cases of fracture re-displacement or internal fixation failure were observed. The Mears evaluation results showed anatomical reduction in 12 cases, satisfactory reduction in 4 cases, and unsatisfactory reduction in 2 cases. All internal fixations were accurately placed. All 18 patients were followed up with an average of 18.2±2.5 months (range, 12-36 months). At the last follow-up, the average Majeed score was 87.4±2.9, with 11 cases rated as excellent, 4 as good, and 3 as fair. The two patients with Gibbons grade II nerve injuries improved to grade I postoperatively. Conclusion:Bi-perforative screws fixation for the middle and posterior pelvic columns offers several advantages, including straightforward operation, precise minimally invasive placement, safety and efficacy, robust fixation, and low complication rates, resulting in satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the operation treated of unilateral unstable sacral fracture with S 1 dysplasia by bi-perforative screws of the middle and posterior pelvic columns. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients with proximal S 1 dysplasia and unilateral unstable sacral fractures treated at Tianjin Hospital, from January 2018 to January 2023. The cohort included 10 males and 8 females, with an average age of 46.3±1.2 years (range, 18-56 years). The causes of injury were traffic accidents in 12 cases and falls in 6 cases. All patients had combined anterior pelvic ring injuries, including 14 cases of simple fractures and 4 cases of fractures combined with pubic symphysis injuries. Preoperative neuro-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed that the lumbosacral nerves were not compressed by fracture fragments or displaced bone ends. According to the Dennis classification, there were 8 cases of type I and 10 cases of type II sacral fractures. Abnormalities in S 1 development included 9 cases of steep slopes, 6 cases of anterior rim depression, and 3 cases of both deformities simultaneously. There were 2 cases of nerve injury, both of which were Gibbons grade II. The average time from injury to surgery was 5.4±1.7 days (range, 4-14 days). All patients underwent combined anterior and posterior pelvic fixation in a single stage, with sacral fractures fixed using bi-perforative screws of posterior pelvic ring. The following parameters were recorded: screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, fracture healing time, accuracy of internal fixation placement, postoperative infection rate, and iatrogenic injury incidence. The Mears scoring system was used to evaluate the satisfaction rate of sacral fracture reduction, the Gibbons classification was used to assess neurological recovery, and the Majeed score was used to evaluate pelvic function. Results:The average screw placement time was 38.7±3.5 min for S 1 and 16.5±1.3 min for the posterior column. The average blood loss during screw placement was 30.53±1.61 ml, and the average fluoroscopy time was 11.3±3.2 s. No vascular or nerve injuries occurred in any case after the operation. All sacral fractures healed, with an average healing time of 7.6±2.2 months (range, 3-12 months). No cases of fracture re-displacement or internal fixation failure were observed. The Mears evaluation results showed anatomical reduction in 12 cases, satisfactory reduction in 4 cases, and unsatisfactory reduction in 2 cases. All internal fixations were accurately placed. All 18 patients were followed up with an average of 18.2±2.5 months (range, 12-36 months). At the last follow-up, the average Majeed score was 87.4±2.9, with 11 cases rated as excellent, 4 as good, and 3 as fair. The two patients with Gibbons grade II nerve injuries improved to grade I postoperatively. Conclusion:Bi-perforative screws fixation for the middle and posterior pelvic columns offers several advantages, including straightforward operation, precise minimally invasive placement, safety and efficacy, robust fixation, and low complication rates, resulting in satisfactory clinical outcomes.