Objective:To evaluate the optimization effects of ciprofol-based intravenous anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods:This study was a prospective randomized controlled study. Eighty elderly patients scheduled for elective retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy were randomized to receive either ciprofol-based (group C) or propofol-based intravenous anesthesia (P group), with 40 patients in each group. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg and maintained by intravenous infusion of ciprofol and remifentanil during operation in group C. In group P, anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 1.5 mg/kg and maintained by intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil during operation. The onset time of sedative effect following anesthesia induction, hypotension and injection pain during induction and intraoperative hypotension were recorded.Results:Compared to P group, the incidence of hypotension and injection pain during induction was significantly decreased (28% vs 10%, 60% vs 18%, P<0.05); although the difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension was not statistically significant (25% vs 15%, P>0.05), the RR was 0.6; no significant change was found in the onset time of sedative effect following anesthesia induction in C group ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia, ciprofol-based intravenous anesthesia has certain optimization effects in elderly patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Objective:To evaluate the optimization effects of ciprofol-based intravenous anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods:This study was a prospective randomized controlled study. Eighty elderly patients scheduled for elective retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy were randomized to receive either ciprofol-based (group C) or propofol-based intravenous anesthesia (P group), with 40 patients in each group. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg and maintained by intravenous infusion of ciprofol and remifentanil during operation in group C. In group P, anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 1.5 mg/kg and maintained by intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil during operation. The onset time of sedative effect following anesthesia induction, hypotension and injection pain during induction and intraoperative hypotension were recorded.Results:Compared to P group, the incidence of hypotension and injection pain during induction was significantly decreased (28% vs 10%, 60% vs 18%, P<0.05); although the difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension was not statistically significant (25% vs 15%, P>0.05), the RR was 0.6; no significant change was found in the onset time of sedative effect following anesthesia induction in C group ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia, ciprofol-based intravenous anesthesia has certain optimization effects in elderly patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.