The emergence of systemic therapies has ushered in an era of chemo-diversity for hepatocellular carcinoma, in which drug sequencing is pivotal for maximizing outcomes. Among available agents, lenvatinib is notable for its potent anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties. This review proposes a structured building-block strategy for optimizing sequential drug therapy, conceptualizing each treatment line as a block that contributes cumulatively to survival, and grounding the discussion in clinical insights from lenvatinib administration. We comprehensively evaluated clinical trials, preclinical investigations, and real-world data to identify actionable approaches that enhance tolerability and prolong progression-free survival, with a particular focus on mitigating adverse events, optimizing dosing schedules, and integrating with transarterial therapies. Five refinements emerge as central to maximizing therapeutic benefit: early detection and classification of adverse events, use of supportive agents such as L-carnitine and branched-chain amino acids, structured telephone follow-up, optimization of dosing schedules, including weekend-off regimens, and strategic combination with transarterial therapy. In addition, rationale-based sequencing and clinically relevant switching criteria that extend beyond RECIST are summarized. Collectively, these measures increase the height of each therapeutic block, thereby contributing to cumulative survival within the building-block strategy. In the current era of chemo-diversity, lenvatinib remains a cornerstone agent when accompanied by these clinical refinements. The review provides a practical and conceptual framework for enhancing efficacy through structured sequencing, proactive adverse-event mitigation, and synergistic locoregional strategies, with broad applicability to real-world clinical practice.

Background/Aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was recently proposed as an alternative disease concept to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients with biopsy-confirmed MASLD using data from a multicenter study. Methods: This was a sub-analysis of the Clinical Outcome Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (CLIONE) study that included 1,398 patients with NAFLD. Liver biopsy specimens were pathologically diagnosed and histologically scored using the NASH Clinical Research Network system, the FLIP algorithm, and the SAF score. Patients who met at least one cardiometabolic criterion were diagnosed with MASLD. Results: Approximately 99% of cases (n=1,381) were classified as MASLD. Patients with no cardiometabolic risk (n=17) had a significantly lower BMI than patients with MASLD (20.9 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 kg/m2, P<0.001), in addition to significantly lower levels of inflammation, ballooning, NAFLD activity score, and fibrosis stage based on liver histology. These 17 patients had a median follow-up of 5.9 years, equivalent to 115 person-years, with no deaths, liver-related events, cardiovascular events, or extrahepatic cancers. The results showed that the prognosis for pure MASLD was similar to that for the original CLIONE cohort, with 47 deaths and one patient who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. The leading cause of death was extrahepatic cancer (n=10), while the leading causes of liver-related death were liver failure (n=9), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=8), and cholangiocarcinoma (n=4). Conclusions Approximately 99% of NAFLD cases were considered MASLD based on the 2023 liver disease nomenclature. The NAFLD-only group, which is not encompassed by MASLD, had a relatively mild histopathologic severity and a favorable prognosis. Consequently, the prognosis of MASLD is similar to that previously reported for NAFLD.