Objective: Prevention of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) is crucial for cancer survivors, particularly those who developed the disease during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA). The aim of this study was to assess the current status of SPC prevention among female CAYA cancer survivors. Methods: A survey regarding long-term health issues after cancer treatment was conducted using questionnaires that targeted women aged ≥20 years who had developed cancer before the age of 40 years. The survey assessed various health issues, and this paper focuses on the items related to the respondents’ perceptions and attitudes toward SPC prevention. Results: A total of 1,026 respondents were analyzed. Over 60% of respondents were aware of SPC and the need for screening. The percentages of respondents who underwent regular SPC screening were 53.8%, 51.8%, 29.5%, 43.7%, and 41.1% for cervical, breast, colon, lung, and gastric cancers, respectively. After adjusting for age, type of first cancer, and current follow-up, we found that receiving recommendations for SPC screening was the most critical factor in SPC screening uptake (odds ratio=3.836; 95% confidence interval=2.281–6.451;p<0.001 by logistic regression analysis). However, only 40.4% of the respondents received recommendations for SPC screening from their physicians. Conclusion Despite good awareness of SPC prevention, the uptake rate for cancer screening among cancer survivors was inadequate, indicating that preventive measures for SPC should be promoted. Because recommendations from others strongly influence SPC screening uptake, healthcare professionals should have accurate knowledge and provide guidance regarding SPC prevention.

Purpose: Primary tumor location of colon cancer has been reported to affect the prognosis after curative resection. However, some reports suggested the impact was varied by tumor stage. This study analyzed the prognostic impact of the sidedness of colon cancer in stages II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection using propensity-matched analysis. Methods: Right-sided colon cancer was defined as a tumor located from cecum to splenic flexure, while any more distal colon cancer was defined as left-sided colon cancer. Patients who underwent curative resection at Nara Medical University hospital between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed. Results: There were 110 patients with stage II, 100 patients with stage III, and 106 patients with liver metastasis. After propensity matching, 28 pairs with stage II and 32 pairs with stage III were identified. In the patients with stage II, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were not significantly different for right- and left-sided colon cancers. In the patients with stage III, OS and RFS were significantly worse in right-sided colon cancer. In those with liver metastasis, OS of right-sided colon cancer was significantly worse than left-sided disease, while RFS was similar. Regarding metachronous liver metastasis, the difference was observed only in the patients whose primary colon cancer was stage III. In each stage, significantly higher rate of peritoneal recurrence was found in those with right-sided colon cancer. Conclusion Sidedness of colon cancer had a significant and varied prognostic impact in patients with stage II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection.

Objectives: At present, the dose conversion ratio for a continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl (CIV) and fentanyl transdermal patches (TP), which are widely used in Japan, is not based on the results of clinical studies in Japanese patients. Studies comparing serum fentanyl concentrations in patients with cancer pain treated by TP showed large differences between Japanese patients and those in other countries. We therefore studied the dose conversion ratio in Japanese patients. Methods: From October 2003 through October 2008, we extracted information on all patients with gastrointestinal cancer who underwent rotation from CIV to TP in the gastrointestinal ward of Kitasato University East Hospital. We selected patients in whom the daily dose of CIV or TP (i.e., the basic dose) was unchanged for 10 days after rotation and the difference in the number of rescue doses (per day) as compared with immediately before rotation was 1 or less on at least 3 consecutive days. All TP preparations used in this study were reservoir-type. Regression lines were plotted on the basis of the relation of “the basic released dose of TP” to “the basic prescribed dose of CIV,” and the dose conversion ratio was calculated. Results: 47 patients underwent opioid rotation, and 11 of them satisfied the eligibility criteria. Eleven patients were studied. The following regression equation was obtained: Y=1.0227X+1.0103, r²=0.9188, indicating a strong correlation. The dose conversion ratio of CIV to TP (released dose) derived by regression analysis was 1:1. Conclusions: Our results obtained in Japanese patients will allow dose conversion at the time of opioid rotation from CIV to TP to be more appropriately performed.