Background/Aims: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), in which an incision is made around a lesion and snaring is performed after submucosal dissection, has some advantages in colorectal surgery, including shorter procedure time and preventing perforation. However, its value for rescue resection in difficult colorectal ESD cases remains unclear. This study evaluated the utility of rescue hybrid ESD (RH-ESD). Methods: We divided 364 colorectal ESD procedures into the conventional ESD group (C-ESD, n=260), scheduled hybrid ESD group (SH-ESD, n=69), and RH-ESD group (n=35) and compared their clinical outcomes. Results: Resection time was significantly shorter in the following order: RH-ESD (149 [90–197] minutes) >C-ESD (90 [60–140] minutes) >SH-ESD (52 [29–80] minutes). The en bloc resection rate increased significantly in the following order: RH-ESD (48.6%), SH-ESD (78.3%), and C-ESD (97.7%). An analysis of factors related to piecemeal resection of RH-ESD revealed that the submucosal dissection rate was significantly lower in the piecemeal resection group (25% [20%–30%]) than in the en bloc resection group (40% [20%–60%]). Conclusions RH-ESD was ineffective in terms of curative resection because of the low en bloc resection rate, but was useful for avoiding surgery.

Objective: Schwannomas are the most common type of neoplasm of the peripheral nerves. Enucleation is a standard surgical procedure; however, it occasionally results in iatrogenic nerve injury, even with atraumatic procedures. Herein, we present the clinical characteristics of schwannoma arising in the extremities and discuss the clinical outcomes of extra- and intra-capsular enucleation.Patients and Methods: We reviewed 122 schwannomas treated at our institute. Schwannomas arising from the minor nerve (n=30) or intramuscularly (n=15) were operated using the extra-capsular technique. Of the 77 major nerve schwannomas, 62 schwannomas were treated using the intra-capsular technique and 15 schwannomas using the extra-capsular technique.Results: Neurological deficits following enucleation were significantly lower using the intra-capsular technique than with the extra-capsular technique. The patient age, duration of symptoms, maximum tumor diameter, and site of occurrence were not associated with subsequent neurological deficits. With both techniques, no tumor recurrence was observed at the final follow-up.Conclusion: These results support the use of intra-capsular micro-enucleation as a safe and reliable treatment for every type of schwannoma. To minimize the risk of nerve injury, en bloc resection should not be used because the main purpose of schwannoma surgery is the relief of symptoms, not tumor resection.

BACKGROUNDDrug eluting stents (DESs) made with biodegradable polymer have been developed in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes. However, the impact of biodegradable polymers on clinical events and stent thrombosis (ST) remains controversial.

METHODSWe searched Medline, the Cochrane Library and other internet sources, without language or date restrictions for articles comparing clinical outcomes between biodegradable polymer DES and durable polymer DES. Safety endpoints were ST (definite, definite/probable), mortality, and myocardial infarction (MI). Efficacy endpoints were major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTSWe identified 15 randomized controlled trials (n = 17 068) with a weighted mean follow-up of 20.6 months. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of definite/probable ST between durable polymer- and biodegradable polymer- DES; relative risk (RR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.11; P = 0.22. Biodegradable polymer DES had similar rates of definite ST (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.33, P = 0.72), mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.09, P = 0.43), MI (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92-1.26. P = 0.35), MACE (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.09, P = 0.85), and TLR (RR, 0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.06, P = 0.30) compared with durable polymer DES. Based on the stratified analysis of the included trials, the treatment effect on definite ST was different at different follow-up times: ≤ 1 year favoring durable polymer DES and >1 year favoring biodegradable polymer DES.

CONCLUSIONSBiodegradable polymer DES has similar safety and efficacy for treating patients with coronary artery disease compared with durable polymer DES. Further data with longer term follow-up are warranted to confirm the potential benefits of biodegradable polymer DES.

Coronary Artery Disease ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Humans ; Polymers ; administration & dosage ; Thrombosis

BACKGROUNDFirst generation drug-eluting stents (DES) were associated with a high incidence of late stent thrombosis (ST), mainly due to delayed healing and re-endothelization by the durable polymer coating. This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of the Nano polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

METHODSThe Nano trial is the first randomized trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Nano polymer-free SES and Partner durable-polymer SES (Lepu Medical Technology, Beijing, China) in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary lesions. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTSA total of 291 patients (Nano group: n = 143, Partner group: n = 148) were enrolled in this trial from 19 Chinese centers. The Nano polymer-free SES was non-inferior to the Partner durable-polymer DES at the primary endpoint of 9 months (P < 0.001). The 9-month in-segment LLL of the polymer-free Nano SES was comparable to the Partner SES (0.34 ± 0.42) mm vs. (0.30 ± 0.48) mm, P = 0.21). The incidence of MACE in the Nano group were 7.6% compared to the Partner group of 5.9% (P = 0.75) at 2 years follow-up. The frequency of cardiac death and stent thrombosis was low for both Nano and Partner SES (0.8% vs. 0.7%, 0.8% vs. 1.5%, both P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONSIn this multicenter randomized Nano trial, the Nano polymer-free SES showed similar safety and efficacy compared with the Partner SES in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Trials in patients with complex lesions and longer term follow-up are necessary to confirm the clinical performance of this novel Nano polymer-free SES.

Aged ; Coronary Artery Disease ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Sirolimus ; therapeutic use

A 67-year-old man was given a diagnosis of lung cancer and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). We first performed thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR), and then right lower lobectomy for lung cancer. TEVAR shortened the operation time and yielded less operative damage. Therefore, TEVAR can be an effective choice for simultaneous surgery of TAA and lung cancer.

In patients with the visceral fat type obesity, there is a high incidence of glucose and lipid metabolic abnormalities and hypertension. We obtained the following results from a study of the relationship between the degree of visceral fat obesity and metabolic and vascular complications in 98 obese patients with various complications.
1. Viceral fat obesity (V/S ratio ≥ 0.4) was found in 74% of the subjects. The incidence was higher in males than females. The highest incidence was observed in both men and women in thier 40s, and there was no increase with age.
2. The V/S ratio was high in patients with hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and fatty liver in that order. In the V/S ≥ 0.4 group, there was a higher incidence of hyperlipidemia and ischemic heart disease than in the V/S<0.4 group.
3. The V/S ratio was higher in the patients with two or more metabolic and vascular complications than in those with only one complication.
4. A questionnaire survey showed that there were many individuals who did almost no exercise and had a long history of obesity in the V/S ≥ 0.4 group.
5. The V/S ≥ 0.4 group had high triglyceride levels. There was a positive correlation between the V/ S ratio or V value and the trigyceride level, but no correlation between S value and triglyceride level.