1.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.
2.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.
3.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.
4.Proposal of a new indicator of hip compensation for spinopelvic–hip mismatch: a retrospective study in Japan
Ryo FUJITA ; Kohei TAKAHASHI ; Ko HASHIMOTO ; Kazuyoshi BABA ; Kenichiro YAHATA ; Takahiro ONOKI ; Takashi AKI ; Keisuke ISHIKAWA ; Toshimi AIZAWA
Asian Spine Journal 2025;19(6):967-977
Methods:
A total of 209 patients with osteoporosis and 54 with adult spinal deformities were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI–LL): <20° and ≥20° groups. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis, PI, pelvic tilt (PT), LL, sacral slope, and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were measured. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed in 86 patients using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). A new index, PFA–(PI–LL), was defined as spinopelvic–hip mismatch. Correlation coefficients were calculated for each radiographic parameter, and the coefficient of determination (R2) for the relationship of each parameter with SVA was evaluated in both groups. The correlations between SVA, PT, PI–LL, PFA–(PI–LL), and JOABPEQ domain scores were also analyzed.
Results:
PI–LL correlated with PFA in the PI–LL <20° group (r=0.56, p<0.001) but not in the PI–LL ≥20° group. Among all parameters, PFA–(PI–LL) demonstrated the strongest association with SVA, indicating its superior ability to explain variations in sagittal alignment in both groups and across all patients (all patients, R2=0.77). Significant correlations were observed between the radiographic parameters and JOABPEQ scores across all domains.
Conclusions
PFA–(PI–LL), which represented spinopelvic–hip mismatch, was a reliable indicator of hip compensatory function in terms of anterior trunk inclination and HRQOL.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail