BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Accurate estimation of nutrient intake from food consumption requires reliable food composition data. However, since nutrient content changes during cooking, the application of raw ingredient composition may lead to overestimation, particularly for energy and fat in meat dishes. In this study, the suitability of applying cooked food codes for meat dishes to improve the validity of recipe-based nutrient content estimation was evaluated.MATERIALS/METHODS: Pork (thin-sliced and thick-cut belly and shoulder butt) and beef (tenderloin, loin, rib meat, and brisket point) were examined for cooking yield after grilling and their nutrient contents were estimated. Each cut was portioned to 100 g of raw meat and cooked in triplicate. Nutrient content was calculated using both raw and cooked meat codes from the Korean Standard Food Composition Table, and differences in energy, fat, and protein content were compared. RESULTS: When grilled under standardized conditions, the average cooking yield was approximately 65% for pork and 80% for beef (P < 0.0001). Thin slices of pork belly had a lower yield (62.6%) than thicker cuts (68.0%), while beef brisket point had the lowest yield among beef cuts (63.6%). Applying cooked meat codes and measured cooking yields resulted in overall decreases in energy (−10% to −50%) and fat (−20% to −60%) content, with slight increase in protein (up to +34%, P < 0.0001). For beef tenderloin, additional comparisons using matched raw and grilled data from the United States Department of Agriculture SR Legacy Database showed smaller percent differences in energy, fat, and protein than those obtained from the Korean database. CONCLUSION Incorporating measured cooking yields and corresponding cooked meat codes into recipe-based databases can improve the accuracy of nutrient intake estimation. The development of nutrient databases that reflect differences in cooking conditions—including temperature, duration, and doneness—should be prioritized to enhance the validity of national dietary surveys.

This study was conducted to determine recognition of Chikhanwoo, promote its market competitiveness, and vitalize its uses in Korea. This research was carried out on 465 people, including 264 of the general public and 191 livestock farmers. For awareness of Chikhanwoo, 53.6% of the general public and 86.9% of livestock farmers recognized Chikhanwoo (P<0.001) through TV, Internet, news, magazines, and others. For consumption behaviors of Chikhanwoo meat, 4.3% of the general public and 1.9% of livestock farmers have purchased Chikhanwoo meat in the past. Most of them hinted at their intention to repurchase and highly intimated their wish to purchase on whether Chikhanwoo tastes better, is more nutritious and is safer than Hanwoo. In addition, they thought country of origin and price were the most important factors for purchasing (P<0.001). For recognition of the Hanwoo grading system, they preferred 1⁺⁺ and 1⁺, significantly (P<0.001). For need for quality certification, most respondents thought that the government should introduce a quality certification system for Chikhanwoo. For importance factor of prevalence of Chikhanwoo meat, marketability value had the highest degree of importance, followed by taste, quality, tradition and cooking methods (P<0.001). Results of this study show that domestic consumption of Chikhanwoo can be boosted by supplying Chikhanwoo meat with a differentiated taste and a safety assurance to the general public. There is also need to enhance genetic resources and improve brand value of Chikhanwoo. Continuous research and efforts should be made for the development of the livestock market.
Certification ; Cooking ; Farmers* ; Intention ; Internet ; Korea ; Livestock* ; Meat ; Periodicals as Topic ; Prevalence ; Surveys and Questionnaires