1.‘Jayulsingyeongsiljo’ Is Not a Recognized Medical Term: 2025 Survey of the Korean Society of Pain and Autonomic Disorders
Kyomin CHOI ; Jeeyoung OH ; Jin-Woo PARK ; Byeol-A YOON ; Eun Bin CHO ; Tae-Kyeong LEE
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2026;44(1):37-46
Background:
To investigate Korean neurologists' perceptions of the non-standard term ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ and their actual evaluation and management of such patients.
Methods:
We performed an anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey of board-certified Korean neurologists by Korean Society of Pain and Autonomic Disorders between August 13 and September 10, 2025. A questionnaire sent by e-mail asked about demographics, experience with patients labeled with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo,’ use and perceived usefulness of autonomic function tests, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019, and opinions on terminology and the role of neurologists.
Results:
In total, 109 neurologists responded. Most reported that patients presenting for ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ were young or middle-aged adults and that their numbers had increased over the preceding 2 years. Referrals frequently originated from Korean medicine clinics and other non-neurology departments, often after stand-alone heart rate variability testing. Fatigue, orthostatic intolerance, palpitations, sweating abnormalities, gastrointestinal symptoms, and anxiety or insomnia were common, and autonomic testing was generally regarded as helpful. Eighty percent felt that the risks associated with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ are overstated, and 95% preferred replacing the term with standardized expressions such as autonomic dysfunction.
Conclusions
Korean neurologists view ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ as an unrecognized and potentially misleading label and support society-led standardization of terminology and guidance to improve autonomic dysfunction care and resource use.
2.A Policy Proposal to Prevent Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: A Hybrid Framework of a Golden-Period Response, Instrument Tracking, RT-QuIC, and Design-and-Absorb Strategies
YoungSoon YANG ; Jonghee KIM ; Min Hye LEE ; Yong Tae KWAK
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2026;44(2):149-158
3.Short-Term Outcomes of Novel Refractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens: Stage 1 Epiretinal Membrane vs. Normal Retina
Jiwon CHOI ; Sang Min LEE ; Jae Won CHOI ; Min Ji PARK ; Joo Heon ROH ; Tae Heon LEE ; Sun A KIM ; Su Hey CHAE ; Hee Seong YOON ; Jung Yup KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2026;67(2):47-54
Purpose:
We compared short-term clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a novel refractive extended depth-of-focus TECNIS PureSee intraocular lens (IOL) between patients with stage 1 epiretinal membrane (ERM)—characterized by a thin membrane over the macula with preserved foveal depression―and those with a normal retina.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 60 eyes of 60 patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of the TECNIS PureSee IOL between January 2024 and January 2025: 30 eyes with stage 1 ERM and 30 eyes with a normal retina. Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex distribution, cataract severity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and higher-order aberrations, were compared between groups, as were IOL power and target refraction. Postoperative outcomes at 1 month―including CDVA, uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, ocular aberrations, and contrast sensitivity―were evaluated.
Results:
There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics, such as age, sex distribution, cataract grade, CDVA, higher-order aberrations, IOL power, or target refraction between the two groups. At 1 month postoperatively, CDVA, uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, higher-order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity exhibited no significant differences between groups.
Conclusions
In this short-term analysis, the PureSee IOL demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in cataract patients with stage 1 ERM to those with a normal retina.
4.Glaucoma Awareness and Its Determinants in Korea: Findings from the 2017-2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Yun Kyeong HWANG ; Tae-Eun LEE
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2026;67(5):162-169
Purpose:
We investigated the level of glaucoma awareness and identified associated factors among Korean adults aged ≥40 years using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).
Methods:
Among the 16,154 individuals aged ≥40 years who underwent ophthalmic examinations in the 2017-2020 KNHANES, 825 participants diagnosed with glaucoma by an ophthalmologist were included. Glaucoma awareness was defined as a self-reported history of physician-diagnosed glaucoma. Associations between glaucoma awareness and sociodemographic variables including age, sex, education level, income level, and recent ophthalmic examination were evaluated using chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Among the 16,154 participants, 825 (5.1%) were diagnosed with glaucoma. However, only 19.8% were aware of their condition and 14.0% reported were receiving treatment. In logistic regression analysis, older age was significantly associated with greater awareness (≥80 years vs. 40-49 years; p < 0.001). Recent ophthalmic examination within 1 year was significantly associated with higher awareness (≤1 year vs. 1-3 years; p < 0.001). Sex, education level, and income level were not independently associated with glaucoma awareness.
Conclusions
Although glaucoma awareness among Korean adults has more than doubled compared to the 8.0% reported in previous KNHANES analyses, over 80% of affected individuals remain unaware of their diagnosis. Awareness was significantly associated with older age and recent ophthalmic examination emphasizing the importance of regular eye screening. Considering the anticipated rise in glaucoma prevalence, incorporating systematic ophthalmic screening into the national health check-up program should be considered to enhance early detection and management.
5.Effectiveness of low-dose mepolizumab in refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: systemic steroid use and remission
Mi-Ae KIM ; Ji-Hyun LEE ; Eun-Kyung KIM ; Jung-Hyun KIM ; Jisoo PARK ; Se Hee LEE ; Tae-Bum KIM
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2026;41(1):163-174
Background/Aims:
This study investigated the clinical efficacy of low-dose mepolizumab (100 mg) in controlling severe eosinophilic asthma, aiming to induce eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) remission and reduce systemic steroid usage. Additionally, we constructed a basic frame for our longitudinal EGPA cohort by collecting serial blood samples before, during, and after mepolizumab treatment in EGPA patients.
Methods:
We conducted a 2-year prospective observational cohort study in patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma and refractory EGPA who used systemic steroids (≥ 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone) or other immunosuppressant drugs for at least 6 months. All patients were treated with 100 mg of mepolizumab every 4 weeks for 1 year to control severe eosinophilic asthma and then were followed for an additional 1 year to monitor their disease course. We analyzed total systemic steroid use and EGPA remission/relapse during the study period.
Results:
Three EGPA patients were included in this study and completed 16 study visits over a 2-year period. After 1 year of treatment with mepolizumab (100 mg monthly), all 3 patients were able to reduce their maintenance dose of systemic steroids, with 2 patients completely discontinuing use. These 2 patients achieved EGPA remission during mepolizumab treatment, and their remission status remained stable for 1 year after they stopped receiving the medication.
Conclusions
Low-dose mepolizumab treatment demonstrated clinical efficacy in reducing the maintenance dose of systemic steroids required for severe refractory EGPA. While not all patients achieved EGPA remission with low-dose mepolizumab, some did, and their remission persisted even after treatment discontinuation.
6.The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0
Hyo Seon RYU ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Dong Hyun KANG ; Yoo-Kang KWAK ; Han Deok KWAK ; Yoon-Hye KWON ; Dalyon KIM ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Jae Hyun KIM ; Ji Hun KIM ; Jin Won KIM ; Tae Hyung KIM ; Hae Young KIM ; Soo Min NAM ; Gyoung Tae NOH ; Jun Woo BONG ; Nak Song SUNG ; Seon Hui SHIN ; Kil-Yong LEE ; Sung Chul LEE ; Sea-Won LEE ; Jung Won LEE ; Jong Min LEE ; Myung Hoon IHN ; Joo Han LIM ; Woong Bae JI ; Dae Hee PYO ; Young Ki HONG ; Jung-Myun KWAK ;
Annals of Coloproctology 2026;42(1):4-33
Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.
7.Development and Performance Validation of a Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Genotyping Panel for Pan-cancer Analysis
Seoyoung LIM ; Kwang Seob LEE ; Dongju WON ; Sung Hyun SEO ; Seung-Tae LEE ; Jong Rak CHOI ; Jieun SEO ; Saeam SHIN
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2026;46(2):210-219
Background:
Precision oncology is advancing, increasing the demand for comprehensive, non-invasive genomic profiling tools. Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables real-time molecular profiling, treatment monitoring, and early detection of resistance variants. We developed the PAN100 panel (Dxome), a hybridization capture panel targeting 101 genes, as a pan-cancer genotyping assay to detect clinically actionable variants across various cancer types. This study presents the first comprehensive validation of the PAN100 panel including both analytical and clinical performance across eight cancer types using reference materials and matched tissue samples.
Methods:
For analytical validation, we assessed accuracy, limit of detection (LoD), and precision using Seraseq ctDNA v2 Reference Materials (SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA). Clinical validation was performed using plasma samples from 27 patients with eight types of cancer and 17 matched tumor samples. Positive percent agreement (PPA) between ctDNA and tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) results was assessed using TruSight Oncology 500 and TruSight Tumor 170 assays. The limit of blank (LoB) was evaluated in 34 healthy individuals.
Results:
The PAN100 panel demonstrated high precision and linearity (LoD, 0.3%; 95.0% confidence interval, 0.29–0.35) variant allele frequency. The PPA between ctDNA and tissue NGS was 73.1% for single-nucleotide variants, 80.0% for insertions/deletions, and 74.2% overall. The LoB was 0.00001%.
Conclusions
The PAN100 panel is a robust tool for detecting clinically significant variants with high concordance with tissue NGS. Its sensitivity for low-frequency variants enables real-time treatment adaptation, supporting precision oncology. Its comprehensive design is particularly valuable for challenging diagnoses and clonal evolution monitoring.
9.Impact of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring on Surgical and Biochemical Outcomes in Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Suh Yun CHUNG ; Young-min LEE ; Sookyung KIM ; Byung-Chang KIM ; Won Woong KIM ; Yu-mi LEE ; Tae-Yon SUNG ; Ki-Wook CHUNG
Journal of Endocrine Surgery 2026;26(1):9-20
Purpose:
Persistent hypercalcemia after parathyroidectomy (PTx) remains a significant concern in patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT) following kidney transplant (KT). Complete resection of hyperfunctioning glands is challenging due to ectopic or intrathyroidal glands. This study evaluated whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) monitoring during PTx in KT patients with THPT reduces the surgical failure rate.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with THPT who underwent PTx at a single tertiary center. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those without ioPTH monitoring (n=98) and those with ioPTH monitoring (n=13). Surgical procedures included less than subtotal, subtotal, or total PTx with autotransplantation. Surgical failure was defined as persistent hypercalcemia (serum calcium ≥10.3 mg/dL and intact parathyroid hormone [PTH] >65 pg/mL) on postoperative day 1 (POD1) or at ≥6 months postoperatively.
Results:
The ioPTH group demonstrated a significantly lower mean PTH level on POD1 (21±15.3 pg/mL vs. 39±39 pg/mL; P=0.006). Although not statistically significant, the ioPTH group showed a higher biochemical cure rate at 3 months (53.8% vs. 30.6%) and no cases of persistent hyperparathyroidism, compared to 15.3% in the non-ioPTH group.Despite adequate intraoperative PTH reduction, some patients in both groups exhibited isolated PTH elevation without hypercalcemia.
Conclusion
Although ioPTH monitoring did not significantly reduce the surgical failure rate in PTx for THPT, the use of ioPTH may meaningfully improve surgical completeness and reduce the risk of persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism, suggesting its substantial potential value as an intraoperative.
10.Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Fluid-Derived Patient-Derived Cell and Organoid Models in Advanced Gastric Cancer
Ye Jin MOON ; Woo Sun KWON ; Chan Hee PARK ; Jinsoo JANG ; Juin PARK ; Byeong Gyu YOON ; Han Byeol MUN ; Namju KIM ; Choong-kun LEE ; Hei Cheul JEUNG ; Su-Jin SHIN ; Tae Soo KIM ; Sun Young RHA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2026;26(2):260-278
Purpose:
Patient-derived cells (PDCs) and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are complementary preclinical models widely used in translational cancer research. However, their molecular and functional differences have not been systematically characterized. This study established and analyzed paired PDC and PDO models derived from the same gastric cancer ascites to delineate platform-dependent molecular and functional profiles.
Materials and Methods:
Malignant ascites or pleural fluid obtained from 6 patients with advanced gastric cancer were used to establish paired PDC and PDO models. All pairs underwent comprehensive multi-omics profiling, integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data. Phenotypic characterization included morphological, histological, proliferative, and cell cycle analyses. Drug sensitivity assays were performed using 4 chemotherapeutic agents commonly used to treat gastric cancer.
Results:
The 6 paired PDC and PDO models exhibited distinct morphological characteristics.Whole-genome analyses demonstrated high concordance among primary tumors, PDCs, and PDOs, confirming tumor representation across platforms. Multi-omics profiling identified platform-dependent molecular signatures; PDOs were enriched for extracellular matrix remodeling and stemness, whereas PDCs displayed proliferation- and immune-related signatures. Clinically relevant biomarkers, including HER2 and MET alterations, were concordant with primary tumors. Notably, drug responses differed between platforms and patients, indicating platform-dependent and patient-specific chemosensitivity.
Conclusions
Paired PDC and PDO models derived from the same patients preserved core patient-specific tumor characteristics while exhibiting distinct molecular and functional profiles. These findings underscore the culture platform as a critical determinant of experimental outcomes and therapeutic responses. Therefore, careful selection of an appropriate preclinical model is essential to accurately address biological questions and optimize precision oncology strategies.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail