PURPOSE: Treatment of distal tibia fractures poses significant challenge to orthopedic surgeon because of poor blood supply and paucity of soft tissue coverage. There is considerable controversy regarding the superior option of treatment for distal tibia fracture between the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and intramedullary interlocking (IMIL) nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures. The aim of our study is to compare the functional outcome between the two treatment methods. METHODS: This was the prospective comparative study of 100 patients with distal third tibia fractures divided into two groups. The first group of patients were treated with MIPPO technique while the second group of patients were managed by IMIL nailing. Patients were followed up in outpatient department to assess the functional outcomes, malunion, delayed union, nonunion, superficial and deep infection between the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (version 16.0). RESULTS: Average malunion (degrees) in the MIPPO group was 5 (3-7) ± 1.41 vs. 10.22 (8-14) ± 2.04 in the IMIL group (p = 0.001). Similarly postoperative knee pain in the IMIL group was 10% vs. 2% in the MIPPO group (p = 0.001). In terms of superficial infection and nonunion, the results were 8% vs. 4% and 2% vs. 6% for the MIPPO and IMIL group, respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Both procedures have shown the reliable method of fixation for distal extra-articular tibia fractures preserving the soft tissue, bony vascularity and fracture hematoma that provide a favourable biological environment for fracture healing. Considering the results of the study, we have slightly more preference for the MIPPO technique.
Bone Plates/adverse effects* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods* ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Prospective Studies ; Tibia/surgery* ; Tibial Fractures ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical efficacy and safety of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy applied in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastroesophageal cervical anastomosis.

METHODSClinical data of 137 esophageal cancer patients who received minimally invasive esophagectomy from December 2013 to June 2015 in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University were analyzed retrospectively, including 84 patients receiving anastomosis with tubular anastomat (circular staple group), and 53 patients receiving gastroepiploic tunnel anastomosis(tunnel group, position of tunnel anastomosis located in the side of gastrocolic omentum, about 2-3 cm apart from fundus). Incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture was compared between two groups.

RESULTSAll the 137 patients completed minimally invasive esophageal surgeries successfully without conversion to open thoracic or abdominal operation. The time for anastomosis was(20.2±3.1) minutes in circular stapler group and (38.9±2.9) minutes in tunnel group respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t=75.22, P=0.000 0). The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 21.4%(18/84) in circular stapler group and 0(0/53) in tunnel group respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000 3). All the patients were followed up for more than 6 months. During follow-up period, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic stricture was 14.3%(12/84) in circular stapler group and 3.8%(2/53) in tunnel group respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.047 9).

CONCLUSIONThe gastroepiploic cervical tunnel anastomosis is safe and effective and can reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage as well as anastomotic stricture.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Anastomotic Leak ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Constriction, Pathologic ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Esophagoplasty ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Neck ; surgery ; Omentum ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Stapling ; adverse effects ; methods

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the feasibility, safety and short-term clinical outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

METHODSClinical data of 17 patients with esophageal cancer who received RAMIE between April 2016 and July 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSThe age of the patients ranged from 44 to 83. Six patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy while 11 patients underwent surgery alone. All patients were performed by the robot-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. In-hospital mortality was 0%. None was converted to open transthoracic or laparotomy approach. In the neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy group, 3 patients received pathological complete response while 2 patients were stage II(A and 1 patient was stage II(B. In the surgery alone group, 1 patient was stage I(A, 3 patients were stage II(A, 5 patients were stage II(B, 1 patient was stage III(A and 1 patient was stage III(B. The mean operation time was 195 minutes (range 145 to 305 minutes). The mean blood loss was 60 ml (range 30 to 200 ml). Mean lymph node harvest was 28 nodes. The rate of radical resection was 100%. Median ICU stay was 4.5 days (range 1 to 36 days), and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 15.2 days(range 9 to 45 days). Postoperative complication occurred in 4 (23.5%) patients, including 3 (17.6%) of lung lesion, 2 (11.8%) of hoarseness, 1 (5.9%) of chylothorax, while no anastomotic leakage and arrhythmia was observed.

CONCLUSIONRAMIE for esophageal cancer is feasible and safe with favorable early outcomes.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; therapy ; Esophagectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted ; adverse effects ; methods ; Treatment Outcome

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common digestive tract cancers in our country. Although multimodality therapy has been used in the treatment of esophageal cancer, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, surgery plays its irreplaceable role. With the development of techniques and innovation of instruments, minimally invasive esophagectomy is introduced into practice worldwide. Due to its less trauma and fewer complications, minimally invasive esophagectomy draws great attention, however, controversy exists in the question whether minimally invasive esophagectomy has similar efficacy to open esophagectomy. With the aim of providing suggestions for selecting optimal surgical procedure, this review discusses differences between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in the following three aspects: perioperative mortality and morbidity, margin status and harvested lymph node number, and postoperative survival. Nowadays, the advantage of minimally invasive esophagectomy has been widely recognized in reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality, however, in the aspect of radicality and prognosis, it is far from reaching a definite conclusion for lack of multicenter, large sample, prospective, randomized controlled trials. Such trials are warrented so as to show the strength and weakness of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Antineoplastic Protocols ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; Margins of Excision ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Morbidity ; Perioperative Period ; mortality ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Thoracoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSETo describe an indirect reduction technique during minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) of tibial shaft fractures with the use of a distraction support.

METHODSBetween March 2011 and October 2014, 52 patients with a mean age of 48 years (16-72 years) sustaining tibial shaft fractures were included. All the patients underwent MIPPO for the fractures using a distraction support prior to insertion of the plate. Fracture angular deformity was assessed by goni- ometer measurement on preoperative and postoperative images.

RESULTSPreoperative radiographs revealed a mean of 7.6°(1.2°-28°) angulation in coronal plane and a mean of 6.8°(0.5°-19°) angulation in sagittal plane. Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radio- graphs showed a mean of 0.8°(0°-4.0°) and 0.6°(0°-3.6°) of varus/valgus and apex anterior/posterior angulation, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that the distraction support during MIPPO of tibial shaft fractures is an effective and safe method with no associated complications.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Tibial Fractures ; surgery

PURPOSESoft tissue healing is of paramount importance in distal tibial fractures for a successful outcome. There is an increasing trend of using anterolateral plate due to an adequate soft tissue cover on ante- rolateral distal tibia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of minimally invasive anterolateral locking plate in distal tibial fractures.

METHODSThis is a retrospective study of 42 patients with distal tibial fractures treated with minimally invasive anterolateral tibial plating. This study evaluates the bone and soft tissue healing along with emphasis on complications related to bone and soft tissue healing.

RESULTSFull weight bearing was allowed in mean time period of 4.95 months (3-12 months). A major local complication of a wound which required revision surgery was seen in one case. Minor complications were identified in 9 cases which comprised 4 cases of marginal necrosis of the surgical wound, 1 case of superficial infection, 1 case of sensory disturbance over the anterolateral foot, 1 case of muscle hernia and 2 cases of delayed union. Mean distance between the posterolateral and anterolateral incision was 5.7 cm (4.5-8 cm).

CONCLUSIONThe minimally invasive distal tibial fixation with anterolateral plating is a safe method of stabilization. Distance between anterolateral and posterolateral incision can be placed less than 7 cm apart depending on fracture pattern with proper surgical timing and technique.

Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Tibial Fractures ; surgery

Uterine leiomyoma causes considerable morbidity in women. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of gasless laparoscopic myomectomy (GLM) in the management of uterine leiomyoma by comparing GLM with other minimally invasive procedures. Cochrane Library, Pub- Med, EMBASE, Web of Science, WANFANG database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for studies published in English or Chinese between January 1995 and May 2015, and related references were traced. Study outcomes from randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies were presented as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Seventeen studies (including 1862 patients) meeting the inclusion criteria, including 934 treated with GLM and 928 treated with other minimally invasive procedures were reviewed. The results of meta-analysis revealed that GLM resulted in significantly shorter operating time [MD=-10.34, 95% CI (-18.12,-2.56), P<0.00001], shorter hospital stay [MD=-0.47, 95% CI (-0.88,-0.06)], less time to flatus [MD=-2.04, 95% CI (-2.59,-1.48)], less postoperative complications [OR=0.20, 95% CI (0.06, 0.62)] and less blood loss [MD =-30.74, 95% CI (-47.50,-13.98)]. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in duration of post-operative fever [MD=-0.52, 95% CI (-1.46, 0.42)] between the two groups. Additionally, GLM was associated with lower febrile morbidity, lower postoperative abdominal pain, and higher postoperative hemoglobin than other minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. In conclusion, GLM and other minimally invasive procedures are feasible, safe, and reliable for uterine leiomyoma treatment. However, available studies show that GLM is more effective and safer than other minimally invasive approaches.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Leiomyoma ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Uterine Neoplasms ; surgery

This study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) versus open laparotomy with temporary closure in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Clinical data of 212 patients who underwent PCD and 61 patients who were given open laparotomy with temporary closure in our hospital over the last 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed, and outcomes were compared, including total and post-decompression intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, physiological data, organ dysfunction, complications, and mortality. The results showed that the organ dysfunction scores were similar between the PCD and open laparotomy groups 72 h after decompression. In the PCD group, 134 of 212 (63.2%) patients required postoperative ICU support versus 60 of 61 (98.4%) in the open laparotomy group (P<0.001). Additionally, 87 (41.0%) PCD patients experienced complications as compared to 49 of 61 (80.3%) in the open laparotomy group (P<0.001). There were 40 (18.9%) and 32 (52.5%) deaths, respectively, in the PCD and open laparotomy groups (P<0.001). In conclusion, minimally invasive PCD is superior to open laparotomy with temporary closure, with fewer complications and deaths occurring in PCD group.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheterization ; adverse effects ; methods ; Decompression, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Drainage ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension ; complications ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Pancreatitis ; complications ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUNDAlthough the early clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using minimally invasive surgery techniques have been widely described, data on the mid- to long-term outcomes are limited. We designed a retrospective study to compare the two most common TKA techniques - The modified quadriceps-sparing (m-QS) approach and the mini-medial parapatellar (MMP) approach - In terms of the clinical and radiographic parameters, over a minimum follow-up period of 5 years.

METHODSThe m-QS approach was used in 31 knees and the MMP approach, in 36 knees. Knees in both groups were compared for component position and alignment, knee alignment, length of the skin incision, range of motion, Visual Analog Scale score, muscle torques, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and number of complications.

RESULTSThere were no major intergroup differences in any of the clinical and radiographic outcomes assessed at the final follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONSOn the basis of numbers studied, the m-QS group, which requires more technique, showed equivalent results with the MMP group in the postoperative 5 years. Preservation of the extensor mechanism in the m-QS approach could not ensure any improvement in the clinical outcomes during the mid-term follow-up duration.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Knee Joint ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Quadriceps Muscle ; diagnostic imaging ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the feasibility of single-site robotic surgery for benign gynecologic tumors and early stage gynecologic cancers. METHODS: In this single institution, prospective analysis, we analyzed six patients who had undergone single-site robotic surgery between December 2013 and August 2014. Surgery was performed using the da Vinci Si Surgical System. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Single-site robotic surgery was performed successfully in all six cases. The median patient age was 48 years, and the median body mass index was 25.5 kg/m2 (range, 22 to 33 kg/m2). The median total operative time was 211 minutes, and the median duration of intracorporeal vaginal cuff suturing was 32 minutes (range, 22 to 47 minutes). The median duration of pelvic lymph node dissection was 31 minutes on one side and 27 minutes on the other side. Patients' postoperative courses were uneventful. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. No postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSION: When used to treat benign gynecologic tumors and early stage gynecologic cancers, the single-site da Vinci robotic surgery is feasible, safe, and produces favorable surgical outcomes.
Adult ; Body Mass Index ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms, Female/*surgery ; Humans ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Node Excision/methods ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects/methods ; Operative Time ; Pilot Projects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects/*methods ; Treatment Outcome