Purpose: This study is evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of Hook plate fixation in acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries and the differences according to the type of plate and whether coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair had been performed. Materials and Methods: Between February 2008 and November 2022, 112 patients treated with a Hook plate for acute AC joint injuries were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were categorized into DePuy Synthes (n=76) and ARIX Hook plate group (n=36), Hook plate with CC ligament repair group (n=42) and Hook plate fixation only group (n=70). The clinical and radiologic outcomes of Hook plate fixation were evaluated by analyzing the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), subacromial erosion and associated surgical complications depending on the different types of Hook plate (DePuy Synthes vs. ARIX clavicle system) and the application of additional CC ligament repair. Results: The median follow-up period after implant removal for the 112 patients was 7.4 months (range, 6.0–124.8 months). The ASES and UCLA scores at the final follow-up were 77.2±6.2 and 31.8±2.3, respectively, and the CCD was 115.5%±28.9% compared to the unaffected side.There were no significant differences in the final VAS score, ASES score, UCLA score, CCD, subacromial erosion and surgical complications between the DePuy Synthes and ARIX Hook plate groups. In addition, there was no difference depending on whether CC ligament repair had been performed. Conclusion Hook plate fixation in acute AC joint injuries showed good clinical and radiological results. It is considered a good surgical method, and there was no difference in the results depending on plate type and CC ligament repair.

Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

Purpose: This study is evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of Hook plate fixation in acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries and the differences according to the type of plate and whether coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair had been performed. Materials and Methods: Between February 2008 and November 2022, 112 patients treated with a Hook plate for acute AC joint injuries were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were categorized into DePuy Synthes (n=76) and ARIX Hook plate group (n=36), Hook plate with CC ligament repair group (n=42) and Hook plate fixation only group (n=70). The clinical and radiologic outcomes of Hook plate fixation were evaluated by analyzing the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), subacromial erosion and associated surgical complications depending on the different types of Hook plate (DePuy Synthes vs. ARIX clavicle system) and the application of additional CC ligament repair. Results: The median follow-up period after implant removal for the 112 patients was 7.4 months (range, 6.0–124.8 months). The ASES and UCLA scores at the final follow-up were 77.2±6.2 and 31.8±2.3, respectively, and the CCD was 115.5%±28.9% compared to the unaffected side.There were no significant differences in the final VAS score, ASES score, UCLA score, CCD, subacromial erosion and surgical complications between the DePuy Synthes and ARIX Hook plate groups. In addition, there was no difference depending on whether CC ligament repair had been performed. Conclusion Hook plate fixation in acute AC joint injuries showed good clinical and radiological results. It is considered a good surgical method, and there was no difference in the results depending on plate type and CC ligament repair.

Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

Purpose: This study is evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of Hook plate fixation in acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries and the differences according to the type of plate and whether coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair had been performed. Materials and Methods: Between February 2008 and November 2022, 112 patients treated with a Hook plate for acute AC joint injuries were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were categorized into DePuy Synthes (n=76) and ARIX Hook plate group (n=36), Hook plate with CC ligament repair group (n=42) and Hook plate fixation only group (n=70). The clinical and radiologic outcomes of Hook plate fixation were evaluated by analyzing the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), subacromial erosion and associated surgical complications depending on the different types of Hook plate (DePuy Synthes vs. ARIX clavicle system) and the application of additional CC ligament repair. Results: The median follow-up period after implant removal for the 112 patients was 7.4 months (range, 6.0–124.8 months). The ASES and UCLA scores at the final follow-up were 77.2±6.2 and 31.8±2.3, respectively, and the CCD was 115.5%±28.9% compared to the unaffected side.There were no significant differences in the final VAS score, ASES score, UCLA score, CCD, subacromial erosion and surgical complications between the DePuy Synthes and ARIX Hook plate groups. In addition, there was no difference depending on whether CC ligament repair had been performed. Conclusion Hook plate fixation in acute AC joint injuries showed good clinical and radiological results. It is considered a good surgical method, and there was no difference in the results depending on plate type and CC ligament repair.

Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

In patients with fully edentulous jaw, treatment of complete dentures should be carried out in many stages when following the conventional methods. Therefore there were disadvantages such as multiple visits to dental clinic is inevitable. In addition, errors caused by polymerization shrinkage, which happens during the fabrication of denture, and difficulties in reproduction of damaged or lost denture were considered as disadvantages. But nowadays, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system is widely used in dentistry and it has begun to expand its spectrum in manufacturing complete dentures. Using CAD/CAM system to fabricate complete dentures can reduce the number of patient's visit and clinical chair time, since taking impression, recording jaw relation, and selection of artificial teeth are performed at the same time during the first visit, and delivering of dentures during the second visit is possible. In addition, because 3D-Printing technology is used, errors by polymerization shrinkage can be reduced. Among the companies that fabricate complete dentures using CAD/CAM system, DENTCA CAD/CAM denture (DENTCA Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) is the most commercialized company. In this case, we treated patients of complete dentures using conventional complete denture method and DENTCA CAD/CAM denture system in the same patient. We would like to report this case because we have achieved good results not only in functional aspects of pronunciation, chewing, and swallowing but also in aesthetic aspects.
Computer-Aided Design ; Deglutition ; Dental Clinics ; Dentistry ; Denture, Complete ; Dentures ; Humans ; Jaw ; Jaw, Edentulous ; Mastication ; Methods ; Polymerization ; Polymers ; Reproduction ; Tooth, Artificial