OBJECTIVES: Kudoa septempunctata has been identified as the causative agent of food poisoning following the consumption of raw farmed Paralichthys olivaceus. However, cohort studies providing robust evidence for an association between K. septempunctata and gastrointestinal symptoms remain limited. This prospective cohort study investigated the association between the consumption of K. septempunctata–infected farmed P. olivaceus and the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: Individuals who purchased raw farmed P. olivaceus between 2020 and 2021 were selected as the study population. Study data included 2 rounds of questionnaire surveys administered before and after consumption, 2 muscle specimens obtained from each purchased fish, and human biological specimens collected from individuals who developed gastrointestinal symptoms within 24 hours after consumption. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and t-test, and the association between consumption of K. septempunctata–infected farmed P. olivaceus and gastrointestinal symptoms was evaluated using relative risk estimates between exposure groups. RESULTS: The relative risk of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with exposure to K. septempunctata–infected P. olivaceus ranged from 71.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0 to 178.6) to 124.5 (95% CI, 43.5 to 355.0) across the 2 case definitions. A strong and statistically significant association was observed between exposure to K. septempunctata–infected P. olivaceus and the development of acute gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate both an association and a causal relationship between consumption of K. septempunctata–infected farmed P. olivaceus and the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Background: This study aimed to investigate changes after repeated subacromial drug injections in a rat model of normal rotator cuff. Methods: Thirty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups 1 (no injection, n = 3), 2 (parecoxib, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.5 mg/kg), and 3 (triamcinolone, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.3 mg/kg). Groups 2 and 3 received subacromial injections 1–6 times once weekly for 6 weeks. The supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons and muscles were used for biomechanical and histological evaluation. The subacromial bursa was used to analyze the prostaglandin E2 (PEG2) level. Results: In the biomechanical test, load-to-failure and ultimate stress decreased in groups 2 and 3 with repeated injections and the values were significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 only at the sixth injection (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008, respectively). On the Bonar score, the cellularity, ground substance, and total score were significantly different among the 3 groups at the fifth and sixth injections (cellularity: p = 0.028 and p = 0.033, ground substance: p = 0.018 and p = 0.006, and total score: p = 0.029 and p = 0.027, respectively). The myocyte cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle showed a significant difference among the 3 groups at the third and fourth injections (p = 0.031 and p = 0.020, respectively). The PEG2 level in the subacromial bursa was significantly different among the 3 groups at the third, fifth, and sixth injections (p = 0.019, p = 0.004, and p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusions In the rat model of normal rotator cuff, repeated local injections of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor showed fewer negative effects on the biomechanical and histological properties of the normal tendon than triamcinolone.

Background: This study aimed to investigate changes after repeated subacromial drug injections in a rat model of normal rotator cuff. Methods: Thirty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups 1 (no injection, n = 3), 2 (parecoxib, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.5 mg/kg), and 3 (triamcinolone, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.3 mg/kg). Groups 2 and 3 received subacromial injections 1–6 times once weekly for 6 weeks. The supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons and muscles were used for biomechanical and histological evaluation. The subacromial bursa was used to analyze the prostaglandin E2 (PEG2) level. Results: In the biomechanical test, load-to-failure and ultimate stress decreased in groups 2 and 3 with repeated injections and the values were significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 only at the sixth injection (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008, respectively). On the Bonar score, the cellularity, ground substance, and total score were significantly different among the 3 groups at the fifth and sixth injections (cellularity: p = 0.028 and p = 0.033, ground substance: p = 0.018 and p = 0.006, and total score: p = 0.029 and p = 0.027, respectively). The myocyte cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle showed a significant difference among the 3 groups at the third and fourth injections (p = 0.031 and p = 0.020, respectively). The PEG2 level in the subacromial bursa was significantly different among the 3 groups at the third, fifth, and sixth injections (p = 0.019, p = 0.004, and p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusions In the rat model of normal rotator cuff, repeated local injections of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor showed fewer negative effects on the biomechanical and histological properties of the normal tendon than triamcinolone.

Background: This study aimed to investigate changes after repeated subacromial drug injections in a rat model of normal rotator cuff. Methods: Thirty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups 1 (no injection, n = 3), 2 (parecoxib, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.5 mg/kg), and 3 (triamcinolone, n = 18; 6 subgroups, n = 3 each; 0.3 mg/kg). Groups 2 and 3 received subacromial injections 1–6 times once weekly for 6 weeks. The supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons and muscles were used for biomechanical and histological evaluation. The subacromial bursa was used to analyze the prostaglandin E2 (PEG2) level. Results: In the biomechanical test, load-to-failure and ultimate stress decreased in groups 2 and 3 with repeated injections and the values were significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 only at the sixth injection (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008, respectively). On the Bonar score, the cellularity, ground substance, and total score were significantly different among the 3 groups at the fifth and sixth injections (cellularity: p = 0.028 and p = 0.033, ground substance: p = 0.018 and p = 0.006, and total score: p = 0.029 and p = 0.027, respectively). The myocyte cross-sectional area of the infraspinatus muscle showed a significant difference among the 3 groups at the third and fourth injections (p = 0.031 and p = 0.020, respectively). The PEG2 level in the subacromial bursa was significantly different among the 3 groups at the third, fifth, and sixth injections (p = 0.019, p = 0.004, and p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusions In the rat model of normal rotator cuff, repeated local injections of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor showed fewer negative effects on the biomechanical and histological properties of the normal tendon than triamcinolone.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.