Background/Aims: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. We investigated genomic determinants of clinical benefit from gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in advanced BTC. Methods: Clinical and genomic data using TruSight Oncology 500 were analyzed from patients treated with GAP (N=198) or GC (N=89) as first-line therapy. Results: With a median follow-up of 33.0 months, GAP modestly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–0.989) without significant overall survival (OS) difference compared to GC. Genomic profiling revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (35.2%), KRAS (16.4%), SMAD4 (10.5%), and TNFRSF14 (10.5%), involving RTK/RAS (44.3%), TP53 (41.8%), and PI3K (20.2%) pathways. Single-gene mutations did not predict treatment benefit. However, pathway-level analysis identified PI3K pathway activation as significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.148; 95% CI 1.478–3.124) and OS (HR 2.096; 95% CI 1.413–3.109) in patients receiving GAP, an effect not observed with GC. Importantly, GAP conferred clinical benefit only in patients without PI3K pathway activation, while no survival advantage was seen in those with such alterations (Pinteraction=0.023 for PFS, Pinteraction=0.003 for OS). Similar results were obtained in the independent validation cohort treated with GAP (N=103) or GC (N=64) for BTC. Conclusions Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing identified PI3K pathway activation as key molecular determinant that differentiates patient outcomes between GAP and GC treatments in advanced BTC.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

We report a case of bilateral hand complications following Artecoll injections that were successfully managed with surgical excision and reconstruction using MatriDerm and split-thickness skin grafts. Notably, the patient experienced no postoperative foreign body reactions and achieved excellent functional outcomes, with a complete range of motion at 3.5 years postoperatively. This case underscores the effectiveness of MatriDerm-assisted reconstruction in achieving both functional and aesthetic results.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

We report a case of bilateral hand complications following Artecoll injections that were successfully managed with surgical excision and reconstruction using MatriDerm and split-thickness skin grafts. Notably, the patient experienced no postoperative foreign body reactions and achieved excellent functional outcomes, with a complete range of motion at 3.5 years postoperatively. This case underscores the effectiveness of MatriDerm-assisted reconstruction in achieving both functional and aesthetic results.

We report a case of bilateral hand complications following Artecoll injections that were successfully managed with surgical excision and reconstruction using MatriDerm and split-thickness skin grafts. Notably, the patient experienced no postoperative foreign body reactions and achieved excellent functional outcomes, with a complete range of motion at 3.5 years postoperatively. This case underscores the effectiveness of MatriDerm-assisted reconstruction in achieving both functional and aesthetic results.

Purpose: We evaluated the short-term efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid (HA) eye drops over a 1-month observational period in patients treated with different HA concentrations for dry eye disease. Methods: This prospective, non-interventional, multicenter observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years who were diagnosed with dry eye at participating medical institutions and treated with HA eye drops (Xenobella SD; ChongKunDang Pharm., Seoul, Korea). In total, 886 eyes from 886 patients were analyzed. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in tear film break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining score, dry eye severity, ocular discomfort scale, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) from baseline to 1 month after treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess efficacy according to age, contact lens use, and HA concentration. Safety was evaluated using a questionnaire on adverse events. Results: After 1 month of treatment, all dry eye parameters―ocular surface staining score, TBUT, ocular discomfort scale, OSDI, and dry eye severity―improved significantly. Subgroup analyses revealed greater improvement in selected parameters, including TBUT, among patients <60 years, contact lens users, and those treated with higher concentrations of HA (0.18% or 0.3%), compared to patients aged ≥60 years, non–contact lens users, and those receiving the lower concentration of HA (0.1%). Only five mild adverse events were reported. Conclusions This 1-month observational study demonstrated that HA eye drops significantly improved both signs and symptoms of dry eye with minimal adverse events. Therapeutic benefits were more pronounced in younger patients, contact lens users, and those treated with higher HA concentrations (≥0.18%).

Systemic sclerosis (SS) is an autoimmune disease and pathological mechanisms of SS are unclear. In this study, we investigated the role of T cells in the progression of SS using SKG mice and humanized mice. SKG mice have a spontaneous point mutation in ZAP70. We induced scleroderma in SKG mice and a humanized SS mouse model to assess whether T cell-mediated immune responses induce SS. As a result, we found increased dermal thickness, fibrosis, and lymphocyte infiltration in skin tissue in SKG SS mice compared to BALB/c mice (control). Also, blood cytokine level, including IL-4- and IFN-α which are produced by CD4+ T cells via STIM1/STING/STAT6/IRF3 signaling pathways, were increased in SKG mice. Interestingly, skin fibrosis was reduced by inhibiting STING pathway in skin fibroblast.Next, we demonstrated the pathophysiological role of IL-4 and IFN-α in skin fibrosis using a humanized SS mouse model and found increased IL-4- and IFN-α-producing CD4+ T cells and fibrosis. In this study, we found that STING-induced production of IL-4- and type I IFN by CD4+ T cells is a key factor in mouse model and humanized mouse model of SS. Our findings suggest that the STING/STAT6/IRF3 signaling pathways are potential therapeutic targets in SS.

Purpose: To report a case of corneal ulcer caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia monomicrobial infection in an otherwise healthy patient, devoid of underlying medical conditions or predisposing factors.Case summary: A 48-year-old male patient, who was normally healthy without a history of systemic disease, eye trauma, and eye surgery, presented with acute left eye pain that had manifested one day prior. Ophthalmic examination revealed conjunctival injection, corneal edema, and localized corneal ulceration in the left eye. Suspecting infectious keratitis, diagnostic procedures including gram staining, bacterial and fungal cultures, and antibiotic susceptibility testing were promptly instituted. Bacterial culture identified S. maltophilia, prompting an eight-week course of topical gatifloxacin therapy. The subsequent clinical course exhibited improvement, with lingering corneal haziness and the restoration of visual acuity to 1.0. Conclusion The case featuring the single detection of S. maltophilia, known to cause hospital-acquired opportunistic infections, emphasizes the importance of culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in the treatment of keratitis. Remarkably, in a patient with a normal immune status and in the absence of factors predisposing to S. maltophilia infections, there were no discernible causative factors damaging the ocular surface environment.