Purpose: The study was designed to evaluate the combined therapeutic effect of topical 2% rebamipide and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC) for managing dry eye following cataract surgery compared with 2% rebamipide monotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery and were diagnosed with dry eye one week postoperatively. Among these, patients who received combined therapy with 2% rebamipide and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) eye drops (combined therapy group), or 2% rebamipide alone (monotherapy group), for at least two months were included. Clinical data were collected at one and two months after surgery, including Schirmer’s test, tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining scores, tear film osmolarity, tear lipid layer thickness, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores. Results: In the combined therapy group, we observed a significant improvement in Schirmer’s test, TBUT, and ocular surface staining scores at both one and two months post-surgery compared to baseline (1 month: p < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.005; 2 months: p < 0.001, respectively). OSDI remained unchanged throughout the entire follow-up period. The combined therapy group exhibited significantly longer Schirmer’s test results (p < 0.001, 0.003), longer TBUT (p = 0.022 at 1 month), and a lower ocular surface staining score (p < 0.001, respectively) compared to the monotherapy group. Conclusions Following cataract surgery, the combined use of rebamipide and CMC eye drops resulted in improvements in Schirmer’s test, TBUT, and ocular surface staining scores. This suggests that combination therapy may be a promising option for patients who do not achieve adequate relief with rebamipide eyedrops.

Background/Aims: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. We investigated genomic determinants of clinical benefit from gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in advanced BTC. Methods: Clinical and genomic data using TruSight Oncology 500 were analyzed from patients treated with GAP (N=198) or GC (N=89) as first-line therapy. Results: With a median follow-up of 33.0 months, GAP modestly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–0.989) without significant overall survival (OS) difference compared to GC. Genomic profiling revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (35.2%), KRAS (16.4%), SMAD4 (10.5%), and TNFRSF14 (10.5%), involving RTK/RAS (44.3%), TP53 (41.8%), and PI3K (20.2%) pathways. Single-gene mutations did not predict treatment benefit. However, pathway-level analysis identified PI3K pathway activation as significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.148; 95% CI 1.478–3.124) and OS (HR 2.096; 95% CI 1.413–3.109) in patients receiving GAP, an effect not observed with GC. Importantly, GAP conferred clinical benefit only in patients without PI3K pathway activation, while no survival advantage was seen in those with such alterations (Pinteraction=0.023 for PFS, Pinteraction=0.003 for OS). Similar results were obtained in the independent validation cohort treated with GAP (N=103) or GC (N=64) for BTC. Conclusions Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing identified PI3K pathway activation as key molecular determinant that differentiates patient outcomes between GAP and GC treatments in advanced BTC.

Purpose: This study compared the efficacy of different irrigation methods for the removal of Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal. Materials and Methods: The root canals of 75 human mandibular premolars with standardized 15-mm canal lengths were prepared using nickel-titanium rotary files. After drying, the canals were filled with Ca(OH)2 paste. The teeth were divided into five groups: Control group (Group C), conventional irrigation; Group EA, sonic activation (EndoActivator); Groups EQA and EQB, sonic activation (EQ-S with metal tips A and B, respectively); and Group EU, ultrasonic activation (EndoUltra).The Ca(OH)2 paste volume before and after irrigation was measured using micro-computed tomography (CT) images. One specimen from each group was bisected along the long axis, and the canal walls were evaluated at 100× magnification using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Overall, Ca(OH)2 paste removal was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. In the coronal third, removal rate was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. In the middle third, Groups EQB and EU outperformed Group C. Removal from the apical third was higher in Group EQA than in Group C. All groups showed greater removal from the coronal and middle thirds than from the apical third. Conclusion Sonic and ultrasonic irrigation methods demonstrated higher efficacy than conventional irrigation method for the removal of Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal. All groups demonstrated better effectiveness in removal from the coronal and middle thirds than from the apical third.

Purpose: We evaluated the short-term efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid (HA) eye drops over a 1-month observational period in patients treated with different HA concentrations for dry eye disease. Methods: This prospective, non-interventional, multicenter observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years who were diagnosed with dry eye at participating medical institutions and treated with HA eye drops (Xenobella SD; ChongKunDang Pharm., Seoul, Korea). In total, 886 eyes from 886 patients were analyzed. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in tear film break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining score, dry eye severity, ocular discomfort scale, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) from baseline to 1 month after treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess efficacy according to age, contact lens use, and HA concentration. Safety was evaluated using a questionnaire on adverse events. Results: After 1 month of treatment, all dry eye parameters―ocular surface staining score, TBUT, ocular discomfort scale, OSDI, and dry eye severity―improved significantly. Subgroup analyses revealed greater improvement in selected parameters, including TBUT, among patients <60 years, contact lens users, and those treated with higher concentrations of HA (0.18% or 0.3%), compared to patients aged ≥60 years, non–contact lens users, and those receiving the lower concentration of HA (0.1%). Only five mild adverse events were reported. Conclusions This 1-month observational study demonstrated that HA eye drops significantly improved both signs and symptoms of dry eye with minimal adverse events. Therapeutic benefits were more pronounced in younger patients, contact lens users, and those treated with higher HA concentrations (≥0.18%).

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Purpose: To report a case of corneal ulcer caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia monomicrobial infection in an otherwise healthy patient, devoid of underlying medical conditions or predisposing factors.Case summary: A 48-year-old male patient, who was normally healthy without a history of systemic disease, eye trauma, and eye surgery, presented with acute left eye pain that had manifested one day prior. Ophthalmic examination revealed conjunctival injection, corneal edema, and localized corneal ulceration in the left eye. Suspecting infectious keratitis, diagnostic procedures including gram staining, bacterial and fungal cultures, and antibiotic susceptibility testing were promptly instituted. Bacterial culture identified S. maltophilia, prompting an eight-week course of topical gatifloxacin therapy. The subsequent clinical course exhibited improvement, with lingering corneal haziness and the restoration of visual acuity to 1.0. Conclusion The case featuring the single detection of S. maltophilia, known to cause hospital-acquired opportunistic infections, emphasizes the importance of culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in the treatment of keratitis. Remarkably, in a patient with a normal immune status and in the absence of factors predisposing to S. maltophilia infections, there were no discernible causative factors damaging the ocular surface environment.

Objective: Microtubule (MT) stability in neurons is vital for brain development; instability is associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. The present study examined the effects of social defeat stress (SDS) on MT-regulating proteins and tubulin polymerization. Methods: After 10 days of SDS, defeated mice were separated into susceptible (Sus) and unsusceptible (Uns) groups based on their performance in a social avoidance test. Using extracted brain tissues, we measured the expression levels of α-tubulin, acetylated α-tubulin, tyrosinated α-tubulin, MT-associated protein-2 (MAP2), stathmin (STMN1), phospho stathmin serine 16 (p-STMN1 [Ser16]), phospho stathmin serine 25 (p-STMN1 [Ser25]), phospho stathmin serine 38 (p-STMN1 [Ser38]), stathmin2 (STMN2), phospho stathmin 2 serine 73 (p-STMN2 [Ser73]), 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP-78), and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)-homologous protein (CHOP) using Western blot assay. The tubulin polymerization rate was also measured. Results: We observed increased and decreased expression of acetylated and tyrosinated α-tubulin, respectively, decreased expression of p-STMN1 (Ser16) and increased expression of p-STMN1 (Ser25), p-STMN2 (Ser73) and GRP-78 and CHOP in the prefrontal cortex and/or hippocampus of defeated mice. A reduced tubulin polymerization rate was observed in the Sus group compared to the Uns and Con groups. Conclusion Our findings suggest that SDS has detrimental effects on MT stability, and a lower tubulin polymerization rate could be a molecular marker for susceptibility to SDS.

Purpose: To evaluate the potential advantages of using topical rebamipide 2% to manage dry eye following cataract surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion) were evaluated for dry eye 1 week postoperatively. Randomly selected patients were divided into the rebamipide group, who received 2% rebamipide eye drops, and the control group, who did not receive rebamipide. Various dry eye-related tests, including Schirmer’s test, the tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining, tear film osmolarity, tear lipid layer thickness, and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) were performed in both groups 1 week, and 1 and 2 months postoperatively. Results: In the rebamipide group, we observed significant improvement in TBUT, the ocular surface staining score, and OSDI at 2 months postoperatively, as compared to 1 week (p = 0.002, 0.014, and 0.013, respectively). Schirmer’s test, tear film osmolarity, and tear lipid layer thickness remained unchanged in the rebamipide group. Throughout the entire follow-up period, the rebamipide group had a significantly prolonged TBUT (1 month: p = 0.007, 2 months: p = 0.000), and lower ocular surface staining score (1 month: p = 0.000, 2 months: p = 0.000), as compared to the control. Conclusions Following cataract surgery, the use of rebamipide eye drops produced improvements in TBUT, ocular surface staining scores, and OSDI. This suggests that rebamipide offers benefits in managing dry eye that can occur after cataract surgery.