Background: Laser procedures are integral to dermatologic practice, yet safety measures- particularly regarding ocular protection and plume control- are poorly studied in real-world settings. Objective: To evaluate current practices in eye protection, infection control, and occupational risk awareness among Korean dermatologists performing laser treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified dermatologists at the 2024 Korean Society for Dermatologic Laser Surgery meeting. The questionnaire covered demographics, laser frequency, use of goggles and masks, infection control strategies, ophthalmologic monitoring, and history of warts or cancer. Results: Seventy-nine respondents completed the survey. All reported using protective goggles, but only 26.6% and 22.8% did so for CO 2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers, respectively. Only 24.1% underwent regular eye exams, and 13.9% reported eye conditions after starting laser practice. While 89.9% used masks, 40.8% used dental masks, which are inadequate for plume protection. Suction devices were used by 94.9%, though performance specifications were unclear. Warts were reported by 46.8% of respondents; two reported cancer diagnoses after initiating laser work. Conclusion Despite high overall adherence to basic safety practices, critical gaps remain. Our findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and long-term occupational health monitoring to ensure safe laser practice.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Objective: Thoracic pedicle screw fixation is technically demanding because of the natural variability in pedicle anatomy, a challenge that is further exacerbated in patients with spinal tumors who often have compromised pedicles. The L-point entry, juxtapedicular, and endplate-parallel trajectory (L-JET) technique was developed to provide a uniform entry point, a predictable screw trajectory, and the capacity to accommodate larger-diameter screws at levels T3–10. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the L-JET technique in comparison with the conventional transpedicular method. Methods: A comparative analysis of consecutively collected data was performed to evaluate outcomes associated with the L-JET technique in patients undergoing surgery for thoracic extradural spinal tumors. The L-point was defined as the intersection of a vertical line along the lateral margin of the facet joint and a horizontal line along the upper edge of the transverse process. The screw trajectory was planned with 30° of medial convergence in the axial plane, creating a juxtapedicular path, and a straightforward trajectory in the sagittal plane. Primary outcome measures included screw diameter, screw length, cortical breach rate, and the need for revision surgery, as assessed using computed tomography scans and medical records. Results: A total of 108 screws were placed in 22 patients using the L-JET technique, while 98 screws were placed in 18 patients using the conventional technique. The L-JET group used significantly larger-diameter screws (6.06±0.65 mm) than the conventional group (5.74±0.80 mm, p=0.02), with no significant difference observed in screw length between groups. Medial cortical breach occurred in one screw in each group, and no supra- or infrapedicular breaches were identified. No screw-related neurovascular complications or revision surgeries occurred in either group. Conclusion The L-JET technique enables consistent screw placement with larger-diameter screws, even in compromised pedicles associated with thoracic spinal tumors, without increasing the risk of complications or the need for revision surgery.

Radical cholecystectomy is the standard procedure for gallbladder (GB) cancer, offering the possibility of cure. Many surgeons have increasingly expanded surgical indications following the growing trend of robotic surgery in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. This study presents our experience with several robotic single-port (SP) plus one-port radical cholecystectomies using the da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical). Data from five patients who underwent robotic SP radical cholecystectomy for GB cancer between April 2024 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients presented with imaging findings suggestive of localized GB cancer (T2 or lower). The median operative time was 145 minutes (range, 121–153 minutes), and the median number of harvested lymph nodes was five (range, five to eight). The median hospital stay after surgery was 6 days (range, 6–7 days), with no major complications reported. Robotic SP radical cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible option for GB cancer.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

Purpose: Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is now the standard for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) and is being considered for RPC. Early recurrence after curative surgery in RPC is often seen as a treatment failure, prompting considerations for NAT. Our goal was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive model utilizing preoperatively available factors to forecast early recurrences of resected RPC. Methods: This study included 469 patients who underwent surgery for RPC between 2011 and 2019. Clinicopathologic and oncologic data were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative variables, including laboratory data and imaging findings, were collected. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence occurring within a year after surgery. Deep neural networks were then used to select variables by assessing their importance. A new model predicting early recurrence of RPC was subsequently developed. Results: Of the patients evaluated, 199 (42.4%) experienced early recurrence. The predictive model included 14 preoperative variables: CA 19-9, preoperative pancreatitis, serum albumin, platelet count, lymphocyte count, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, tumor size, monocyte count, age, body mass index, CRP, hemoglobin, WBC count, and CEA. The area under the curve for the model was 0.786 in the training set and 0.734 in the test set. Conclusion We developed an AI-based model to predict the early recurrence of RPC using preoperative parameters. By identifying patients at risk of early recurrence, optimal individualized treatments such as NAT can be considered. Future prospective studies are crucial to establish clear indications for NAT in RPC.

Purpose: This study evaluates the Korean Cancer Study Group Geriatric Score-7 (KG-7) frailty screening tool’s effectiveness in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients to prevent under and overtreatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective pilot cohort study included 100 elderly patients aged 70 and older with newly diagnosed MM who had not undergone transplantation from August 2020 to January 2022. Results: The median age was 77 years, and 73.0% of patients were classified at International Staging System stages 2 or 3. Using a 5-point cutoff on the KG-7 index (non-frail, score ≥ 5; frail, score < 5), 31% were categorized as frail. After a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the 3-year overall survival rate was 73.0%. There was no statistically significant association between any frailty index and the risk of death. However, frail patients defined by the simplified frailty index (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 5.95; p=0.030) and by KG-7 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.86; p=0.043) had a significantly higher risk of grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, whereas the International Myeloma Working Group definition did not. Over a 24-month tracking period, vulnerability as measured by KG-7 either improved or deteriorated. Conclusion The pilot study, which had a limited number of participants, did not demonstrate KG-7’s effectiveness in predicting survival; however, it successfully predicted severe non-hematologic toxicities. We plan to conduct larger studies in elderly MM patients to determine whether KG-7 can help tailor their treatment regimens.

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, leading to increased mortality rates across various conditions. This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on excess in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients and examined variations by community income levels, thereby highlighting socioeconomic disparities. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the National Emergency Department Information System in Korea. Cancer patients who visited emergency departments between January 27 and December 31 in 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (during COVID) were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The main exposure was the COVID-19 outbreak, with county per capita income tax serving as the interaction variable. The risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were calculated. A multilevel linear regression model with an interaction term was used to estimate the difference-in-difference between the periods based on county income tax. Results: A total of 206,400 cancer patients were included 110,879 pre-COVID and 95,521 during COVID with an unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate of 1.0%. The risk-adjusted mortality rate was significantly higher during COVID than pre-COVID (1.2% vs. 0.9%, P<0.01). Using the highest socioeconomic status group (Q1) as the reference, the excess inhospital mortality odds during COVID were higher in Q3 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.54) and Q4 (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.15-1.77). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated in-hospital mortality disparities among cancer patients, imposing a greater burden on lower socioeconomic groups. These findings highlight the importance of implementing equitable healthcare strategies to protect vulnerable populations during health emergencies.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.