Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Lecanemab and donanemab have received full U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, and subsequently, lecanemab has been approved by the Korean FDA and it has recently entered commercial use in Korea. This has increased interest in anti-amyloid immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Anti-amyloid immunotherapy has shown potential to modify the progression of the disease by specifically binding to amyloid β, a key pathological product in Alzheimer’s disease, and eliminating accumulated amyloid plaques in the brain. However, this treatment can be accompanied by a side-effect, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), which requires periodic monitoring by MRI. It is crucial to detect ARIA and accurately assess the severity by radiology. The role of the radiologist is important in this context, requiring proficiency in basic knowledge of ARIA, and in diagnosing/evaluating ARIA. This review aims to comprehensively cover aspects of ARIA, including its definition, pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, assessment of severity by radiology, differential diagnosis, and management.

The introduction of anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), such as lecanemab (Lequembi®), which was recently approved in Korea, necessitates careful monitoring for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) using brain MRI. To optimize ARIA monitoring in Korean clinical settings, the Korean Society of Neuroradiology (KSNR) and the Age and Neurodegeneration Imaging (ANDI) Study Group proposed MRI protocol recommendations on essential MR sequences, MRI acquisition parameters, timing and condition of MRI examinations, and essential details to provide a scientific basis for maximizing the safety and efficacy of AD treatment. A customized, standardized MRI protocol focusing on Korea’s healthcare environment can improve ARIA management and ensure patient safety through early detection of potential anti-amyloid therapy side effects, thereby enhancing treatment quality.

Background: and Purpose The National Brain Biobank of Korea (NBBK) is a brain bank consortium supported by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the Korea National Institute of Health, and was launched in 2015 to support research into neurodegenerative disease dementia (NDD). This study aimed to introduce the NBBK and describes clinicopathological correlations based on analyses of data collected from the NBBK. Methods: Four hospital-based brain banks have been established in South Korea: Samsung Medical Center Brain Bank (SMCBB), Seoul National University Hospital Brain Bank (SNUHBB), Pusan National University Hospital Brain Bank (PNUHBB), and Myongji Hospital Brain Bank (MJHBB). Clinical and pathological data were collected from these brain banks using standardized protocols. The prevalence rates of clinical and pathological diagnoses were analyzed in order to characterize the clinicopathological correlations. Results: Between August 2016 and December 2023, 185 brain specimens were collected and pathologically evaluated (SNUHBB: 117; PNUHBB: 27; SMCBB: 34; MJHBB: 7). The age at consent was 70.8±12.6 years, and the age at autopsy was 71.7±12.4 years. The four-most-common clinical diagnoses were Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia (20.0%), idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (15.1%), unspecified dementia (11.9%), and cognitively unimpaired (CU) (11.4%).Most cases of unspecified dementia had a pathological diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) vasculopathy (31.8%) or AD (31.8%). Remarkably, only 14.2% of CU cases had normal pathological findings. The three-most-common pathological diagnoses were AD (26.5%), CNS vasculopathy (14.1%), and Lewy body disease (13.5%). Conclusions These clinical and neuropathological findings provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying NDD in South Korea.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.