Legal risks and liability issues in medical practice serve as a primary catalyst for the current collapse of essential healthcare services in Korea. Currently, medical disputes in Korea are disproportionately focused on criminal prosecutions and high-damages civil litigation. This punitive approach fosters a culture of concealment, encourages defensive medicine, and accelerates the exodus of medical professionals from essential fields. Ultimately, this cycle deprives the system of opportunities for improvement and poses a significant threat to patient safety. In contrast, many advanced nations have adopted principles of “Just Culture” and “Safe Space,” prioritizing non-punitive reporting and systemic root-cause analysis over individual retribution. To address these issues, this paper proposes four key strategies: First, the establishment of an independent “Patient Safety Investigation Agency” to objectively investigate incidents and identify systemic flaws. Second, a transition from criminal punishment to licensing board-led management, focusing on re-education and counseling to maintain quality of care. Third, the enactment of “Apology Laws” to ensure that expressions of regret or apologies cannot be used as legal evidence of liability, thereby fostering trust and psychological recovery. Finally, the creation of a “Patient Safety Fund” to provide prompt and sufficient public compensation to victims regardless of proven negligence. In conclusion, it is imperative to shift the paradigm by defining medical accidents as “system failures” rather than individual faults. Strengthening the social safety net will encourage medical professionals to return to essential care and build a sustainable healthcare environment centered on patient safety.

While South Korea’s National Health Insurance (NHI) was once disparaged as a rudimentary “discount program,” it has matured into the cornerstone of the nation’s medical safety net owing to sustained governmental initiatives. Nevertheless, the pursuit of expanded benefit coverage, exacerbated by demographic shifts toward low fertility and an aging society, has catalyzed a rapid escalation in aggregate national healthcare spending.Consequently, there is an urgent need for the NHI to implement benefit expansion policies that prioritize cost-efficiency and fiscal prudence. This perspective asserts that coverage enhancement should be strategically focused on high-cost catastrophic illnesses, specifically through the robust fortification of the annual out-of-pocket (OOP) maximum system. Furthermore, the reform of private health insurance is imperative, as its unbridled growth in non-reimbursable services has undermined the efficacy of public coverage efforts. This paper proposes concrete policy frameworks for both the enhancement of the OOP maximum system and the structural reform of private indemnity health insurance.

Recurrent difficulty securing emergency department (ED) acceptance and delayed interfacility transfer, often resulting in multiple sequential transfer attempts (“round-robin” hospital seeking), in the Republic of Korea reflect a patient safety failure across the emergency care continuum, spanning Emergency Medical Services from emergency calls and prehospital care to ED stabilization, definitive treatment, and secondary transfer. We argue that the governance split between the National Fire Agency–led prehospital response and the Ministry of Health and Welfare–led emergency medical system fragments accountability and data, undermining sustainable quality management. We describe a “double bind” in which clinicians face medico-legal risk regardless of acceptance decisions, distorting transfer behavior. We propose an outcome-linked Quality Improvement system—integrated metrics, interoperable data linkage, operational medical control, and routine feedback—to strengthen Continuity of Patient Care. This requires functional integration of the dual command structure; transferring ambulance service functions to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, or an equivalently strong joint-governance model, should be evaluated. Regionally, responsibility-based systems should be implemented through councils that set transfer principles and resource allocation, supported by stable financing and performance review, with the regional emergency medical situation room providing medical control and real-time coordination. For mass-casualty incidents, preparedness should align standardized triage, integrated command and communication, training, and after-action review. Legal reform is a necessary starting point, but trust and sustained patient safety depend more on cultivating a learning-oriented safety culture grounded in patient experience and public deliberation throughout policy design and implementation.

South Korea’s current healthcare system stands at a critical crossroads that will determine whether it can progress in a better direction over the next decade. Behind the relatively stable level of population health that has been maintained until now, it has become clear that the deterioration of patient experiences, the risk of collapse in critical emergency medical services, the burnout of healthcare providers, and the crisis in the sustainability of healthcare finances have all accumulated simultaneously. This crisis can no longer be overcome by partial fixes or short-term measures alone. The answer to what needs to change first must begin with a reaffirmation of what the healthcare system should aim for. Ultimately, what needs to be changed now is not an individual policy, but the criteria and priorities through which we view healthcare. The focus must shift from what to provide more of, to questioning what holds greater social value. If such a shift does not begin now, in ten years we won’t face a better healthcare system, but care enmeshed in a deeper crisis. Now is precisely the time to fundamentally define the direction of the healthcare system.

Purpose: Despite improvements in surgical technology, patients who undergo colorectal emergency surgery still have high mortality and complication rates. This places a high burden on the surgeons and the medical institutions who employ them. Mortality outcomes following emergency colorectal surgery were analyzed and risk factors associated with mortality were identified. Methods: Data from patients who were admitted through the Emergency Room from June 2019 to December 2021 and underwent emergency colorectal surgery performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and medical records of various clinicopathological factors and the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) scores were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Results: During the study period, 164 patients underwent colorectal emergency surgery. Following surgery, 24 patients (14.6%) died during their hospital stay. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification, the MPI score, indication of surgery, and comorbid disease were factors which showed statistically significant differences between the survivor and non-survivor groups. In particular, in the patients with an MPI score of ≥ 30, 22 of 49 deaths occurred. Conclusion Patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery exhibit high postoperative mortality rates. By identifying these patients before surgery, and allocating appropriate surgical and intensive care resources to them, medical resources can be utilized more efficiently, and mortality rates can be reduced.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: Despite improvements in surgical technology, patients who undergo colorectal emergency surgery still have high mortality and complication rates. This places a high burden on the surgeons and the medical institutions who employ them. Mortality outcomes following emergency colorectal surgery were analyzed and risk factors associated with mortality were identified. Methods: Data from patients who were admitted through the Emergency Room from June 2019 to December 2021 and underwent emergency colorectal surgery performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and medical records of various clinicopathological factors and the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) scores were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Results: During the study period, 164 patients underwent colorectal emergency surgery. Following surgery, 24 patients (14.6%) died during their hospital stay. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification, the MPI score, indication of surgery, and comorbid disease were factors which showed statistically significant differences between the survivor and non-survivor groups. In particular, in the patients with an MPI score of ≥ 30, 22 of 49 deaths occurred. Conclusion Patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery exhibit high postoperative mortality rates. By identifying these patients before surgery, and allocating appropriate surgical and intensive care resources to them, medical resources can be utilized more efficiently, and mortality rates can be reduced.

Purpose: Despite improvements in surgical technology, patients who undergo colorectal emergency surgery still have high mortality and complication rates. This places a high burden on the surgeons and the medical institutions who employ them. Mortality outcomes following emergency colorectal surgery were analyzed and risk factors associated with mortality were identified. Methods: Data from patients who were admitted through the Emergency Room from June 2019 to December 2021 and underwent emergency colorectal surgery performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and medical records of various clinicopathological factors and the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) scores were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Results: During the study period, 164 patients underwent colorectal emergency surgery. Following surgery, 24 patients (14.6%) died during their hospital stay. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification, the MPI score, indication of surgery, and comorbid disease were factors which showed statistically significant differences between the survivor and non-survivor groups. In particular, in the patients with an MPI score of ≥ 30, 22 of 49 deaths occurred. Conclusion Patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery exhibit high postoperative mortality rates. By identifying these patients before surgery, and allocating appropriate surgical and intensive care resources to them, medical resources can be utilized more efficiently, and mortality rates can be reduced.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.