1.Correlation between serum HIPK2,ANXA5 and the degree of coronary stenosis and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Suna SHI ; Jingmiao BAI ; Xiaojuan LIN ; Mei DONG ; Zili GUO ; Zhenlian LI ; Xiaoling LIU ; Yuanyuan LIU
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2025;46(22):2753-2758
Objective To investigate the correlation between serum homeodomain interacting protein ki-nase 2(HIPK2),annexin A5(ANXA5)and coronary stenosis and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 277 AMI patients who received interventional treatment in this hospi-tal from January 2021 to July 2023 were selected as the AMI group,and another 140 cases with normal or very mild stenosis in coronary angiography during the same period were selected as the control group.According to the degree of coronary artery stenosis(Gensini score),the AMI patients were divided into mild coronary arter-y stenosis group(86 cases),moderate coronary artery disease group(111 cases)and severe coronary artery disease group(80 cases).According to the prognosis,they were divided into poor prognosis group(80 cases)and good prognosis group(197 cases).Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect the serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels.Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels and Gensini score in patients with AMI.Multivariate unconditional Logistic regres-sion was used to determine the relationship between serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels and prognosis of AMI patients.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the predictive efficiency of serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels on prognosis of AMI patients.Results Compared with the control group,the ser-um HIPK2 level in the AMI group increased and the ANXA5 level decreased,and the differences were statisti-cally significant(P<0.05).The serum HIPK2 levels in the mild coronary artery stenosis group,moderate coronary artery stenosis group and severe coronary artery stenosis group increased successively,while the ANXA5 levels decreased successively,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Gensini score was positively correlated with serum HIPK2 level and negatively correlated with serum ANXA5 level in AMI patients(P<0.05).The Gensini score of AMI patients was positively correlated with the serum HIPK2 level(r=0.785,P<0.05),and negatively correlated with the serum ANXA5 level(r=-0.798,P<0.05).Compared with the good prognosis group,the serum HIPK2 level in the poor prognosis group increased(P<0.05),and the ANXA5 level decreased(P<0.05).After adjusting for confounding factors,high HIPK2 was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in AMI patients(P<0.05),and high ANXA5 was an independ-ent protective factor(P<0.05).The area under the curve of the combined prediction of serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels for the prognosis of AMI patients was 0.875,which was greater than 0.778 and 0.784 predic-ted by serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels alone(P<0.05).Conclusion The serum HIPK2 level is increased and the ANXA5 level is decreased in patients with AMI,which is related to the aggravation of coronary steno-sis and the poor prognosis.The combination of serum HIPK2 and ANXA5 levels is more effective in predic-ting the prognosis of patients with AMI.
2.Application of intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve on treatment of coronary intermediate lesion
Boyan LI ; Qingxia ZHAO ; Suna SHI ; Chunyan ZENG ; Xia LI ; Hu LI ; Fengshun JIA ; Yanli ZHANG ; Zheng JI
Chongqing Medicine 2016;45(33):4672-4674
Objective To compare the clinical effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and blood flow reserve fraction (FFR) in guiding the treatment of critical disease of coronary artery.Methods Forty nine patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography were divided into IVUS group (n=43) and FFR group (n=51).In IVUS group,such as MLA <4 mm2 or coronary artery stenosis was insufficient,but IVUS showed unstable plaque,and we went the PCI treatment;in the FFR group,FFR<0.75 was regarded as coronary stenting sign.The patients were followed up for 6 months.The incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was compared between the two groups.Results (1)There was no significant difference in general information and coronary angiography between the two groups (P> 0.05).(2)The proportion of interventional therapy in IVUS group was higher than that in FFR group (P<0.01).(3)The incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion IVUS and FFR examination can be used to guide the interventional treatment of critical disease of coronary artery.However,the accuracy of IVUS can not replace the status of blood flow reserve.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail