Orthopedic surgery is becoming increasingly common, particularly among older adults, due to population aging and the rising incidence of degenerative conditions. Older patients frequently have multiple comorbidities, which elevate the risk of surgical complications. Effective pain management is crucial in facilitating recovery and reducing the likelihood of postoperative complications. This review examines the role of regional anesthesia in optimizing recovery outcomes for orthopedic patients.Current Concepts: Regional anesthesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, which in turn mitigates side effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and urinary retention. It also promotes early mobilization, which is crucial for functional recovery, and helps prevent complications such as deep vein thrombosis and muscle atrophy. Advanced techniques like local infiltration analgesia and motor-sparing blocks offer effective pain relief while preserving muscle strength. This not only facilitates faster rehabilitation but also reduces the length of hospital stays. These advantages underscore the importance of regional anesthesia in improving surgical outcomes and expediting recovery.Discussion and Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is crucial in improving recovery after orthopedic surgery by providing effective pain management, facilitating early mobilization, and minimizing complications. It is essential to customize the anesthetic approach based on the specific surgical procedure and the patient’s overall health to achieve optimal outcomes.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition characterized by extensive lung inflammation and increased alveolar-capillary permeability, often triggered by infections or systemic inflammatory responses. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy holds promise for treating ARDS, as MSCs manifest immunomodulatory and regenerative properties that mitigate inflammation and enhance tissue repair. Primed MSCs, modified to augment specific functionalities, demonstrate superior therapeutic efficacy in targeted therapies compared to naive MSCs. This study explored the immunomodulatory potential of MSCs using mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays and co-culture experiments with M1/M2 macrophages. Additionally, RNA sequencing was employed to identify alterations in immune and inflammation-related factors in primed MSCs. The therapeutic effects of primed MSCs were assessed in an LPS-induced ARDS mouse model, and the underlying mechanisms were investigated through spatial transcriptomics analysis. The study revealed that MSCs primed with IFN-γ and IL-1β significantly enhanced the suppression of T cell activity compared to naive MSCs, concurrently inhibiting TNF-α while increasing IL-10 production in macrophages. Notably, combined treatment with these two cytokines resulted in a significant upregulation of immune and inflammation-regulating factors. Furthermore, our analyses elucidated the mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of primed MSCs, including the inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration in lung tissue, modulation of immune and inflammatory responses, and enhancement of elastin fiber formation. Signaling pathway analysis confirmed that efficacy could be enhanced by modulating NFκB and TNF-α signaling. In conclusion, in early-phase ARDS, primed MSCs displayed enhanced homing capabilities, improved lung function, and reduced inflammation.

Orthopedic surgery is becoming increasingly common, particularly among older adults, due to population aging and the rising incidence of degenerative conditions. Older patients frequently have multiple comorbidities, which elevate the risk of surgical complications. Effective pain management is crucial in facilitating recovery and reducing the likelihood of postoperative complications. This review examines the role of regional anesthesia in optimizing recovery outcomes for orthopedic patients.Current Concepts: Regional anesthesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, which in turn mitigates side effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and urinary retention. It also promotes early mobilization, which is crucial for functional recovery, and helps prevent complications such as deep vein thrombosis and muscle atrophy. Advanced techniques like local infiltration analgesia and motor-sparing blocks offer effective pain relief while preserving muscle strength. This not only facilitates faster rehabilitation but also reduces the length of hospital stays. These advantages underscore the importance of regional anesthesia in improving surgical outcomes and expediting recovery.Discussion and Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is crucial in improving recovery after orthopedic surgery by providing effective pain management, facilitating early mobilization, and minimizing complications. It is essential to customize the anesthetic approach based on the specific surgical procedure and the patient’s overall health to achieve optimal outcomes.

Orthopedic surgery is becoming increasingly common, particularly among older adults, due to population aging and the rising incidence of degenerative conditions. Older patients frequently have multiple comorbidities, which elevate the risk of surgical complications. Effective pain management is crucial in facilitating recovery and reducing the likelihood of postoperative complications. This review examines the role of regional anesthesia in optimizing recovery outcomes for orthopedic patients.Current Concepts: Regional anesthesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, which in turn mitigates side effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and urinary retention. It also promotes early mobilization, which is crucial for functional recovery, and helps prevent complications such as deep vein thrombosis and muscle atrophy. Advanced techniques like local infiltration analgesia and motor-sparing blocks offer effective pain relief while preserving muscle strength. This not only facilitates faster rehabilitation but also reduces the length of hospital stays. These advantages underscore the importance of regional anesthesia in improving surgical outcomes and expediting recovery.Discussion and Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is crucial in improving recovery after orthopedic surgery by providing effective pain management, facilitating early mobilization, and minimizing complications. It is essential to customize the anesthetic approach based on the specific surgical procedure and the patient’s overall health to achieve optimal outcomes.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition characterized by extensive lung inflammation and increased alveolar-capillary permeability, often triggered by infections or systemic inflammatory responses. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy holds promise for treating ARDS, as MSCs manifest immunomodulatory and regenerative properties that mitigate inflammation and enhance tissue repair. Primed MSCs, modified to augment specific functionalities, demonstrate superior therapeutic efficacy in targeted therapies compared to naive MSCs. This study explored the immunomodulatory potential of MSCs using mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays and co-culture experiments with M1/M2 macrophages. Additionally, RNA sequencing was employed to identify alterations in immune and inflammation-related factors in primed MSCs. The therapeutic effects of primed MSCs were assessed in an LPS-induced ARDS mouse model, and the underlying mechanisms were investigated through spatial transcriptomics analysis. The study revealed that MSCs primed with IFN-γ and IL-1β significantly enhanced the suppression of T cell activity compared to naive MSCs, concurrently inhibiting TNF-α while increasing IL-10 production in macrophages. Notably, combined treatment with these two cytokines resulted in a significant upregulation of immune and inflammation-regulating factors. Furthermore, our analyses elucidated the mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of primed MSCs, including the inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration in lung tissue, modulation of immune and inflammatory responses, and enhancement of elastin fiber formation. Signaling pathway analysis confirmed that efficacy could be enhanced by modulating NFκB and TNF-α signaling. In conclusion, in early-phase ARDS, primed MSCs displayed enhanced homing capabilities, improved lung function, and reduced inflammation.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.