1.Erratum to ‘Genomic biomarkers to predict response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from the IMbrave150 trial’ Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:807-823
Sun Young YIM ; Sung Hwan LEE ; Seung-Woo BAEK ; Bohwa SOHN ; Yun Seong JEONG ; Sang-Hee KANG ; Kena PARK ; Hyewon PARK ; Sunyoung S. LEE ; Ahmed O. KASEB ; Young Nyun PARK ; Sun-Hee LEEM ; Michael A. CURRAN ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Ju-Seog LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(2):669-670
2.KASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease 2025
Won SOHN ; Young-Sun LEE ; Soon Sun KIM ; Jung Hee KIM ; Young-Joo JIN ; Gi-Ae KIM ; Pil Soo SUNG ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Young CHANG ; Eun Joo LEE ; Hye Won LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Su Jong YU ; Young Kul JUNG ; Byoung Kuk JANG ;
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(Suppl):S1-S31
3.The urgent need for multidisciplinary approaches in managing alcohol-associated liver disease: Editorial on “The prognostic impact of psychiatric intervention on alcohol-associated liver disease: The UK Biobank cohort study”
Soon Sun KIM ; Jae Youn CHEONG
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):316-318
4.Correspondence to editorial 2 on “Genomic biomarkers to predict response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from the IMbrave150 trial”
Sun Young YIM ; Sung Hwan LEE ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Sunyoung S LEE ; Ahmed O KASEB ; Ju-Seog LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):e84-e86
5.Correspondence to editorial 1 on “Genomic biomarkers to predict response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from the IMbrave150 Trial”
Sung Hwan LEE ; Sun Young YIM ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Sunyoung S. LEE ; Ahmed O. KASEB ; Ju-Seog LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):e81-e83
6.Correspondence to letter to the editor on “Genomic biomarkers to predict response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from the IMbrave150 trial”
Sung Hwan LEE ; Sun Young YIM ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Sunyoung S LEE ; Ahmed O KASEB ; Peng WEI ; Ju-Seog LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):e110-e112
7.A rare case of a large solid pseudopapillary neoplasm with extensive liver metastasis
Jun Hyung KIM ; Hyung Sun KIM ; Jung Min LEE ; Ji Hae NAHM ; Joon Seong PARK
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(1):83-87
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are uncommon pancreatic tumors that primarily affect young females. We report a case of a 24-year-old female diagnosed with SPN and liver metastasis during a routine examination. Imaging revealed an 8-cm pancreatic mass with multiple liver metastases. Histopathology confirmed SPN. Subsequent next-generation sequencing revealed a CTNNB1 mutation.The patient underwent a total pancreatectomy with splenectomy, right hemihepatectomy, and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation.Two years after the surgery, she remained complication-free. She is under regular surveillance. This case underscores the importance of early detection and comprehensive management of SPN.
8.Evaluation of health-related quality of life and performance in intestinal transplant and rehabilitation patients: a cross-sectional study
Eunju JANG ; Mi-hyeong KIM ; Jeong-kye HWANG ; Sun Cheol PARK ; Sang Seob YUN ; Myung Duk LEE ; Jae Hee CHUNG
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(1):31-38
Purpose:
We aimed to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in intestinal failure (IF) patients after different modes of intestinal rehabilitation.
Methods:
HRQoL was assessed using the generic 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36, ver. 2) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in 6 different areas: diet, sleep, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, and other symptoms.
Results:
Twenty-two patients completed the questionnaires, of which 7 had received intestinal transplant (ITx), 9 were continuing home total parenteral nutrition (HPN), and 6 had tapered off total parenteral nutrition (TPN). SF-36 physical component summary scores were highest in the ITx group (median, 65.6; interquartile range [IQR], 31.6–80.3) compared to the HPN (median, 48.4; IQR, 44.7–66.3) or tapered group (median, 54.2; IQR, 45.2–61.6). Mental component summary scores were lowest in the ITx group (median, 48.8; IQR, 37.1–63.6), compared to the TPN (median, 60.2; IQR, 41.6–78.5) or tapered group (median, 51.0; IQR, 48.8–56.0). Differences were not significant in all items of the SF-36. VAS scores showed that patients in the ITx group showed the best results in diet (0.9), gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (1.4), and musculoskeletal pain (2.4). There was a significant difference in sleep (P = 0.036), with the ITx (1.43) and HPN groups (1.33) showing better outcomes compared with the tapered group (4.67). Patients in the tapered group showed the least favorable results in all performance areas, except GI symptoms.
Conclusion
SF-36 did not show a significant difference between the ITx, HPN, and tapered groups, but VAS showed a significant difference in sleep between groups. Further studies, including serial data, will allow a better understanding of the effects of different modes of intestinal rehabilitation.
9.Ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasm is increasing as a surgical indication in the biologics era:a retrospective observational study of 20 years of experience in a single tertiary center
Hyo Jun KIM ; Seung-Bum RYOO ; Jin Sun CHOI ; Han-Ki LIM ; Min Jung KIM ; Ji Won PARK ; Seung-Yong JEONG ; Kyu Joo PARK
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(3):150-157
Purpose:
We aimed to identify changes in surgical indications in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the biologics era in a single tertiary center.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, 108 patients with UC who underwent abdominal surgery for UC at Seoul National University Hospital from 2000 to 2021 were included. We compared the total number of patients undergoing UC before and after the introduction of biologic therapy.
Results:
Of the 108 patients with UC (male, 59 and female, 49; mean age, 46.8 years), 30 (27.8%) underwent surgery for neoplasms and 78 (72.2%) for medical intractability without neoplasms. The duration between diagnosis and surgery varied significantly (126.00 months vs. 60.50 months, P = 0.001). A significant difference was also noted in the surgical indications according to time (P = 0.02). Between 2000 and 2010, 12 patients (19.4%) underwent surgery for UC with neoplasms and 50 (80.6%) for UC without neoplasms, while between 2011 and 2021, 18 (39.1%) and 28 patients (60.9%) underwent surgery for UC with and without neoplasms, respectively.
Conclusion
Since 2011, when biological agents were covered by insurance in South Korea, there has been a relative increase in the incidence of surgical indications for neoplasia cases. Focusing on closely monitoring individuals with longterm UC for neoplasms is necessary.
10.Breast cancer implant reconstructive surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis of medical records
Ji Young YUN ; Ki Jung AHN ; Hyunjung KIM ; Hee Yeon KIM ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Kyung Do BYUN ; Ji Sun PARK ; Yunseon CHOI
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(5):295-301
Purpose:
This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery.
Results:
The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence.
Conclusion
RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail